World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4919
World Ranking
10853
National Ranking
5677

Marta Meana publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marta Meana sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marta Meana D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marta Meana sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marta Meana is affiliated with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, including subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, complementary and alternative medicine, cognitive neuroscience, urology, and endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism.

The topics covered in their research include:

  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Complementary and alternative medicine studies
  • Pain management and placebo effect
  • Urinary bladder and prostate research
  • Hormonal and reproductive studies

Marta Meana has published multiple papers in peer-reviewed journals, with recent publications including:

  • The Biopsychosocial Puzzle of Painful Sex, 2022, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Eye of a Rook, 2021, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
  • Three Women, 2021, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
  • Consent: A Memoir, 2024, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy

Their most frequent publication venues are the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, with three publications, and the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, with one publication.

Marta Meana has collaborated with several researchers, notably Yitzchak M. Binik and Amy D. Lykins, with whom they have co-authored works.

Best Publications

  • A randomized comparison of group cognitive–behavioral therapy, surface electromyographic biofeedback, and vestibulectomy in the treatment of dyspareunia resulting from vulvar vestibulitis

    Sophie Bergeron;Yitzchak M Binik;Samir Khalifé;Kelly Pagidas

  • Biopsychosocial profile of women with dyspareunia.

    Marta Meana;Yitzchak M. Binik;Samir Khalife;Deborah R. Cohen

  • A review of psychosocial outcomes of surgery for morbid obesity

    Lindsey E Bocchieri;Marta Meana;Barry L Fisher

  • Elucidating Women's (hetero)Sexual Desire: Definitional Challenges and Content Expansion

    Marta Meana

  • Sex Differences in Visual Attention to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli

    Amy D. Lykins;Marta Meana;Gregory P. Strauss

  • Information needs and decisional preferences among women with ovarian cancer.

    Donna E. Stewart;F. Wong;A. M. Cheung;A. M. Cheung;J. Dancey;J. Dancey

  • Why Did Passion Wane? A Qualitative Study of Married Women's Attributions for Declines in Sexual Desire

    Karen E. Sims;Marta Meana

  • Perceived Psychosocial Outcomes of Gastric Bypass Surgery: A Qualitative Study

    Lindsey E Bocchieri;Marta Meana;Barry L Fisher

  • Dyspareunia: Sexual Dysfunction or Pain Syndrome?

    Marta Meana;Yitzchak M. Binik;Samir Khalife;Deborah Cohen

  • The Commitment Calibration Hypothesis: When Do People Devalue Attractive Alternatives?

    John E. Lydon;Marta Meana;Deborah Sepinwall;Nancy Richards

  • Gender differences in the content of cognitive distraction during sex

    Marta Meana;Sarah E. Nunnink

  • Detection of Differential Viewing Patterns to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli Using Eye-Tracking Methodology

    Amy D. Lykins;Marta Meana;Gretchen Kambe;Gretchen Kambe

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH—PAIN: Psychosexual Characteristics of Vestibulodynia Couples: Partner Solicitousness and Hostility are Associated with Pain

    Mylène Desrosiers;Sophie Bergeron;Marta Meana;Bianca Leclerc

  • Painful coitus: a review of female dyspareunia.

    Marta Meana;Yitzchak M. Binik

  • Early Dyspareunia Experience in Young Women: Confusion, Consequences, and Help‐seeking Barriers

    Robyn L. Donaldson;Marta Meana

  • THE MOTIVATIONS FOR AND OUTCOMES OF EMPLOYEE REFERRALS

    Rachel S. Shinnar;Cheri A. Young;Marta Meana

  • The Future of Sex Therapy: Specialization or Marginalization?

    Yitzchak M. Binik;Marta Meana

  • Priorities for Endometriosis Research: A Proposed Focus on Deep Dyspareunia

    Paolo Vercellini;Marta Meana;Lone Hummelshoj;Edgardo Somigliana

  • Psychosocial correlates of pain attributions in women with dyspareunia.

    Marta Meana;Marta Meana;Yitzchak M. Binik;Yitzchak M. Binik;Samir Khalife;Samir Khalife;Deborah Cohen;Deborah Cohen

  • Affect and marital adjustment in women's rating of dyspareunic pain.

    Marta Meana;Irv Binik;Sainir Khalife;Deborah Cohen

Frequent Co-Authors

Yitzchak M. Binik
Yitzchak M. Binik McGill University
Donna E. Stewart
Donna E. Stewart University of Toronto
Sophie Bergeron
Sophie Bergeron University of Montreal
Karen J. Berkley
Karen J. Berkley Florida State University
Angela M. Cheung
Angela M. Cheung University of Toronto
Rhonda Amsel
Rhonda Amsel McGill University
Mary Pat McAndrews
Mary Pat McAndrews University Health Network
James M. Cantor
James M. Cantor Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Caroline F. Pukall
Caroline F. Pukall Queen's University
Kathleen T. Brady
Kathleen T. Brady Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology can open doors to varied career pathways, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. Many aspiring professionals begin their journey by researching state-specific requirements. For example, aspiring counselors can learn more about substance abuse counselor requirements in Orlando, which outline the essential education, licensing, and training steps needed.

Education standards can differ across cities and states. Those interested in working in Pennsylvania should understand the Philadelphia substance abuse counselors education requirements. Similarly, if you are thinking of a career in Arizona, review the guide to becoming a substance abuse counselor in Phoenix.

Online psychology programs can provide flexibility for earning degrees or certifications needed for licensing. If you plan to work in Pittsburgh, be sure to understand the steps for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Pittsburgh. Comparing requirements is important, as they may influence your choice of degree program and future employment opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Marta Meana

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles