World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Markus Bernhardt-Römermann

Markus Bernhardt-Römermann

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
9176
World Ranking
5996
National Ranking
317

Markus Bernhardt-Römermann publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Bernhardt-Römermann sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 97 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Markus Bernhardt-Römermann D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Bernhardt-Römermann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Bernhardt-Römermann is affiliated with Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany. Their research spans several interconnected fields primarily within Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

They further specialize in several subfields of study such as:

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science

The core topics Markus Bernhardt-Römermann has worked on encompass:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Forest Management and Policy

The scientist has contributed to research published in multiple frequent venues, including:

  • Science
  • Journal of Ecology
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Diversity and Distributions
  • Journal of Vegetation Science

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Markus Bernhardt-Römermann include:

  • Forest microclimate dynamics drive plant responses to warming, 2020, Science
  • Replacements of small- by large-ranged species scale up to diversity loss in Europe's temperate forest biome, 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Dimensions of invasiveness: Links between local abundance, geographic range size, and habitat breadth in Europe's alien and native floras, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • More losses than gains during one century of plant biodiversity change in Germany, 2022, Nature
  • Directional turnover towards larger-ranged plants over time and across habitats, 2021, Ecology Letters

Throughout their career, Markus Bernhardt-Römermann has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Kris Verheyen
  • Wolfgang Schmidt
  • Pieter De Frenne
  • Lander Baeten
  • Jörg Brunet

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Biodiversity Differences between Managed and Unmanaged Forests: Meta-Analysis of Species Richness in Europe

    Yoan Paillet;Laurent Bergès;Joakim HjÄltén;Péter Ódor

  • Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming

    Pieter De Frenne;Pieter De Frenne;Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez;David Anthony Coomes;Lander Baeten

  • Forest microclimate dynamics drive plant responses to warming

    Florian Zellweger;Florian Zellweger;Pieter De Frenne;Jonathan Lenoir;Pieter Vangansbeke

  • Driving factors behind the eutrophication signal in understorey plant communities of deciduous temperate forests

    Kris Verheyen;Lander Baeten;Pieter De Frenne;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann

  • Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: Raised by tree richness or beaten by beech?

    Andreas Mölder;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Wolfgang Schmidt

  • Forest floor vegetation response to nitrogen deposition in Europe

    Thomas Dirnböck;Ulf Grandin;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Burkhardt Beudert

  • Impacts of Land Abandonment on Vegetation: Successional Pathways in European Habitats

    Bernard Prévosto;Loek Kuiters;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Michaela Dölle

  • Functional traits and local environment predict vegetation responses to disturbance: a pan‐European multi‐site experiment

    Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Alan Gray;Adam J. Vanbergen;Laurent Bergès

  • Drivers of temporal changes in temperate forest plant diversity vary across spatial scales

    Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Lander Baeten;Dylan Craven;Pieter De Frenne

  • On the identification of the most suitable traits for plant functional trait analyses

    Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Christine Römermann;Robert Nuske;Andreas Parth

  • Global environmental change effects on plant community composition trajectories depend upon management legacies.

    Michael P. Perring;Michael P. Perring;Markus Bernhardt‐Römermann;Lander Baeten;Gabriele Midolo;Gabriele Midolo

  • More losses than gains during one century of plant biodiversity change in Germany

    Unknown

  • Substitutes for grazing in semi-natural grasslands - do mowing or mulching represent valuable alternatives to maintain vegetation structure?

    Christine Römermann;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Michael Kleyer;Peter Poschlod

  • Explaining grassland biomass – the contribution of climate, species and functional diversity depends on fertilization and mowing frequency

    Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Christine Römermann;Stefan Sperlich;Wolfgang Schmidt

  • Impacts of land-use on West African savanna vegetation: a comparison between protected and communal area in Burkina Faso

    Blandine Marie Ivette Nacoulma;Katharina Schumann;Salifou Traoré;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann

  • Combining Biodiversity Resurveys across Regions to Advance Global Change Research

    Kris Verheyen;Pieter De Frenne;Lander Baeten;Donald M Waller

  • Replacements of small- by large-ranged species scale up to diversity loss in Europe’s temperate forest biome

    Ingmar R. Staude;Donald M. Waller;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Anne D. Bjorkman

  • Directional turnover towards larger-ranged plants over time and across habitats.

    Unknown

  • Dimensions of invasiveness: Links between local abundance, geographic range size, and habitat breadth in Europe's alien and native floras

    Trevor S. Fristoe;Milan Chytrý;Wayne Dawson;Franz Essl

  • Changed vegetation composition in coniferous forests near to motorways in Southern Germany: the effects of traffic-born pollution.

    M. Bernhardt-Römermann;M. Kirchner;T. Kudernatsch;G. Jakobi

  • Short-term effects of temperature enhancement on growth and reproduction of alpine grassland species

    Thomas Kudernatsch;Anton Fischer;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Clemens Abs

  • Changes in the dominant assembly mechanism drive species loss caused by declining resources

    Simon Thorn;Simon Thorn;Claus Bässler;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Marc Cadotte;Marc Cadotte

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Kopecký
Martin Kopecký Czech Academy of Sciences
Kris Verheyen
Kris Verheyen Ghent University
Radim Hédl
Radim Hédl Czech Academy of Sciences
Jörg Brunet
Jörg Brunet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Pieter De Frenne
Pieter De Frenne Ghent University
Guillaume Decocq
Guillaume Decocq University of Picardie Jules Verne
Thilo Heinken
Thilo Heinken University of Potsdam
Michael P. Perring
Michael P. Perring Ghent University
Petr Petřík
Petr Petřík Czech Academy of Sciences
Monika Wulf
Monika Wulf University of Potsdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students drawn to Ecology and Evolution often pursue interdisciplinary pathways, upgrading their expertise or shifting fields. A popular option for those without a direct background is enrolling in speech language pathology bridge programs online. These programs are designed for non-majors, allowing individuals from varied scientific backgrounds to transition into speech-language pathology careers.

Healthcare roles also see many non-traditional students. For example, aspiring nurses can consider online bsn programs for non nurses. These affordable and accelerated routes are increasingly popular, offering flexibility for students changing careers or enhancing their qualifications.

Those interested in advanced practice in healthcare may explore what it takes to become a nurse practitioner. If you’re curious about how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make, resources can help you compare salary ranges across states. For those seeking a fast track, discover how to become a nurse practitioner in the shortest possible time.

With these online pathways, career transitions into healthcare, research, and applied science become much more accessible—supporting diverse professional goals for Ecology and Evolution graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Bernhardt-Römermann

Trending Scientists