World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
8042
World Ranking
18427
National Ranking
7523

Brenda Oppert publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda Oppert sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 147 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Brenda Oppert D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda Oppert sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brenda Oppert is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within agricultural and biological sciences, with a focus on insect science, molecular biology, genetics, plant science, and ecology.

Their work covers a variety of topics related to insect biology and management, with key interests including:

  • Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis

Brenda Oppert has published notably in venues such as the Journal of Economic Entomology, Genes, BMC Genomics, Pharmaceutics, and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. The Journal of Economic Entomology stands out as a frequent publication venue with four contributions.

Selected recent papers include:

  • Transcriptome analysis of life stages of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus, to improve insect crop production (2020) in Scientific Reports
  • Brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål), genome: putative underpinnings of polyphagy, insecticide resistance potential and biology of a top worldwide pest (2020) in BMC Genomics
  • Effective Degradation of Gluten and Its Fragments by Gluten-Specific Peptidases: A Review on Application for the Treatment of Patients with Gluten Sensitivity (2021) in Pharmaceutics
  • Human proline specific peptidases: A comprehensive analysis (2020) in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
  • Genome and Genetic Engineering of the House Cricket (Acheta domesticus): A Resource for Sustainable Agriculture (2023) in Biomolecules

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Elena N. Elpidina, Valeriia F. Tereshchenkova, J. Spencer Johnston, Yakov E. Dunaevsky, and Mikhail A. Belozersky.

Best Publications

  • The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum.

    Stephen Richards;Richard A. Gibbs;George M. Weinstock;Susan J. Brown

  • PROTEINASE-MEDIATED INSECT RESISTANCE TO BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS TOXINS

    Brenda Oppert;Karl J. Kramer;Richard W. Beeman;Donovan Johnson

  • A model species for agricultural pest genomics: The genome of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

    Sean D. Schoville;Yolanda H. Chen;Martin N. Andersson;Joshua B. Benoit

  • Protease interactions with bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxins

    Brenda Oppert

  • Altered protoxin activation by midgut enzymes from a Bacillus thuringiensis resistant strain of Plodia interpunctella.

    B. Oppert;K.J. Kramer;D.E. Johnson;S.C. Macintosh

  • Insect Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Alterations in the Indianmeal Moth Larval Gut Proteome

    Mehmet Candas;Olga Loseva;Brenda Oppert;Pradeepa Kosaraju

  • Evaluation of quantitative PCR reference genes for gene expression studies in Tribolium castaneum after fungal challenge.

    Jeffrey C. Lord;Kris Hartzer;Michelle Toutges;Brenda Oppert

  • Comparative analysis of proteinase activities of Bacillus thuringiensis-resistant and -susceptible Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).

    Huarong Li;Brenda Oppert;Randall A Higgins;Fangneng Huang

  • Luminal proteinases from Plodia interpunctella and the hydrolysis of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(c) protoxin.

    Brenda Oppert;Karl J. Kramer;Karl J. Kramer;Donovan Johnson;Steve J. Upton

  • Diversity of digestive proteinases in Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) larvae.

    K.S. Vinokurov;E.N. Elpidina;B. Oppert;S. Prabhakar

  • Different mechanisms of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in the indianmeal moth.

    Salvador Herrero;Brenda Oppert;Juan Ferré

  • A novel Tenebrio molitor cadherin is a functional receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa toxin.

    Jeff Fabrick;Chris Oppert;Marce D. Lorenzen;Kaley Morris

  • Dietary mixtures of cysteine and serine proteinase inhibitors exhibit synergistic toxicity toward the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum

    Brenda Oppert;Thomas D. Morgan;Christina Culbertson;Karl J. Kramer

  • Effects of proteinase inhibitors on digestive proteinases and growth of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).

    B Oppert;T D Morgan;K Hartzer;B Lenarcic

  • Prospecting for cellulolytic activity in insect digestive fluids

    Cris Oppert;William E. Klingeman;Jonathan D. Willis;Brenda Oppert

  • Compensatory proteolytic responses to dietary proteinase inhibitors in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

    B. Oppert;T.D. Morgan;K. Hartzer;K.J. Kramer

  • Analysis of midgut proteinases from Bacillus thuringiensis-susceptible and -resistant Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

    Lohitash Karumbaiah;Brenda Oppert;Juan L. Jurat-Fuentes;Michael J. Adang

  • Sequence analysis and molecular characterization of larval midgut cDNA transcripts encoding peptidases from the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L.

    S. Prabhakar;M.-S. Chen;E. N. Elpidina;K. S. Vinokurov

  • Tribolium castaneum Larval Gut Transcriptome and Proteome: A Resource for the Study of the Coleopteran Gut

    Kaley Morris;Marcé D. Lorenzen;Yasuaki Hiromasa;John M. Tomich

  • A chymotrypsin-like proteinase from the midgut of Tenebrio molitor larvae.

    E.N. Elpidina;T.A. Tsybina;Y.E. Dunaevsky;M.A. Belozersky

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl J. Kramer
Karl J. Kramer Kansas State University
Stephen Richards
Stephen Richards South Australian Museum
Kun Yan Zhu
Kun Yan Zhu Kansas State University
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine
Hugh M. Robertson
Hugh M. Robertson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Matthew T. Weirauch
Matthew T. Weirauch Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Bernard Henrissat
Bernard Henrissat Technical University of Denmark
Fangneng Huang
Fangneng Huang Louisiana State University
Kim C. Worley
Kim C. Worley Baylor College of Medicine
Donna M. Muzny
Donna M. Muzny Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a broad variety of advanced online degree options and rewarding career pathways. Many graduates pursue health administration, management, or clinical leadership roles, and there are flexible programs to help you get there. For those interested in managing healthcare systems, cahme accredited mha programs ensure rigorous training and recognized credentials.

If you're seeking to advance clinical expertise without extensive dissertation work, explore online dnp programs without dissertation. For those aiming for executive roles or research-focused positions, an advanced doctorate in healthcare management may be the next step.

Pharmaceutical careers are also a natural progression for Biochemistry majors, with options like an online pharmd opening doors to clinical pharmacy and research leadership positions. These online pathways offer flexibility and specialization, helping you tailor your career to your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Brenda Oppert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles