World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
28770
World Ranking
14998
National Ranking
7582

Mark Linzer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Linzer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 231 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark Linzer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Linzer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Linzer is affiliated with Hennepin County Medical Center in the United States. Their research concentrates primarily on health professions and medicine, with a strong focus on the subfields of general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, economics and econometrics, clinical psychology, and gender studies.

Their scholarly output includes topics such as healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, innovations in medical education, diversity and career in medicine, health systems with economic evaluations and quality of life considerations, COVID-19 and mental health, workplace health and well-being, and patient-provider communication in healthcare.

Mark Linzer has published in several key venues, with the most frequent being the Journal of General Internal Medicine, followed by Circulation, JAMA Network Open, Learning Health Systems, and UNC Libraries. Among their recent published papers are:

  • "Prevalence and correlates of stress and burnout among U.S. healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional survey study," 2021, EClinicalMedicine
  • "Association of Physician Burnout With Suicidal Ideation and Medical Errors," 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • "Supporting Clinicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • "The Association of Work Overload with Burnout and Intent to Leave the Job Across the Healthcare Workforce During COVID-19," 2023, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • "Trends in Clinician Burnout With Associated Mitigating and Aggravating Factors During the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2022, JAMA Health Forum

Frequent collaborators in Mark Linzer's work include Sara Poplau, Christine A. Sinsky, Víctor M. Montori, Erin E. Sullivan, and Elizabeth Goelz.

Best Publications

  • Utility of a New Procedure for Diagnosing Mental Disorders in Primary Care: The PRIME-MD 1000 Study

    Robert L. Spitzer;Janet B. W. Williams;Kurt Kroenke;Mark Linzer

  • Health-Related Quality of Life in Primary Care Patients With Mental Disorders: Results From the PRIME-MD 1000 Study

    Robert L. Spitzer;Kurt Kroenke;Mark Linzer;Steven R. Hahn

  • Physical symptoms in primary care. Predictors of psychiatric disorders and functional impairment.

    Kurt Kroenke;Robert L. Spitzer;Janet B. W. Williams;Mark Linzer

  • Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Served by the Department of Veterans Affairs Results From the Veterans Health Study

    Lewis E. Kazis;Donald R. Miller;Jack Clark;Katherine Skinner

  • The relationship of organizational culture, stress, satisfaction, and burnout with physician-reported error and suboptimal patient care: results from the MEMO study.

    Eric S. Williams;Linda Baier Manwell;Thomas R. Konrad;Mark Linzer

  • The Work Lives of Women Physicians: Results from the Physician Work Life Study

    Julia E. McMurray;Mark Linzer;Thomas R. Konrad;Jeffrey Douglas

  • Diagnosing syncope. Part 1: Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians.

    Mark Linzer;Eric H. Yang;N. A.Mark Estes;Paul Wang

  • Working Conditions in Primary Care: Physician Reactions and Care Quality

    Mark Linzer;Linda Baier Manwell;Eric S. Williams;James A. Bobula

  • Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study.

    Mark Linzer;Thomas R. Konrad;Jeffrey Douglas;Julia E. McMurray

  • The difficult patient: Prevalence, psychopathology, and functional impairment

    Steven R. Hahn;Steven R. Hahn;Kurt Kroenke;Robert L. Spitzer;David Brody

  • Multisomatoform Disorder: An Alternative to Undifferentiated Somatoform Disorder for the Somatizing Patient in Primary Care

    Kurt Kroenke;Robert L. Spitzer;Frank V. deGruy;Steven R. Hahn

  • Predicting and preventing physician burnout: results from the United States and the Netherlands.

    Mark Linzer;Mechteld R.M. Visser;Frans J. Oort;Ellen M.A. Smets

  • The work lives of women physicians results from the physician work life study. The SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group.

    J E McMurray;M Linzer;T R Konrad;J Douglas

  • Initial orthostatic hypotension: review of a forgotten condition.

    Wouter Wieling;C. T. Paul Krediet;Nynke van Dijk;Mark Linzer

  • Management of Vasovagal Syncope Controlling or Aborting Faints by Leg Crossing and Muscle Tensing

    C.T. Paul Krediet;Nynke van Dijk;Mark Linzer;Johannes J. van Lieshout

  • Understanding physicians: Intentions to withdraw from practice: The role of job satisfaction, job stress, mental and physical health

    Eric S. Williams;Thomas R. Konrad;William E. Scheckler;Donald E. Pathman

  • Lifetime cumulative incidence of syncope in the general population: a study of 549 Dutch subjects aged 35-60 years.

    Karin S. Ganzeboom;Gideon Mairuhu;Johannes B. Reitsma M.D.;Mark Linzer

  • Diagnosing syncope. Part 2 : Unexplained syncope

    Mark Linzer;Eric H. Yang;N. A.Mark Estes;Paul Wang

  • Prevalence and correlates of stress and burnout among U.S. healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional survey study

    Kriti Prasad;Colleen McLoughlin;Martin Stillman;Sara Poplau

  • Career Satisfaction of US Women Physicians: Results From the Women Physicians' Health Study

    Erica Frank;Julia E. McMurray;Mark Linzer;Lisa Elon

Frequent Co-Authors

Lewis E. Kazis
Lewis E. Kazis Boston University
Wouter Wieling
Wouter Wieling University of Amsterdam
Donald R. Miller
Donald R. Miller University of Louisville
Janet B. W. Williams
Janet B. W. Williams Columbia University
Kurt Kroenke
Kurt Kroenke Indiana University
Avron Spiro
Avron Spiro Boston University
N.A. Mark Estes
N.A. Mark Estes Tufts Medical Center
Johannes B. Reitsma
Johannes B. Reitsma Utrecht University
Mickey Trockel
Mickey Trockel Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine doesn’t always require the traditional MD route. Many students consider alternative healthcare degrees that offer flexibility, online coursework, and career advancement opportunities. For aspiring nurses, it’s important to ask: do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN? Some nursing schools now offer admissions without standardized test requirements, making the path more accessible.

Health care administration is another growing field for those interested in leadership roles within healthcare settings. Earning a health care administration degree online allows you to balance studies with work or family commitments, and prepares you for roles in management or operations.

Nurses looking to advance their clinical practice may consider bridge programs such as asn to np (Associate’s to Nurse Practitioner), which offer a streamlined path to higher qualifications and improved salary prospects.

For those passionate about nutrition and preventive medicine, pursuing an online dietitian degree offers a chance to make a difference in community health and wellbeing. Whichever pathway you choose, online healthcare degrees deliver flexibility and open doors to diverse medical careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Linzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles