World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
10670
World Ranking
5215
National Ranking
2860

Mark A. Fine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Fine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 183 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark A. Fine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Fine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Fine is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Greensboro in the United States. Their research focuses predominantly on social sciences, with particular emphasis on family dynamics and relationships, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, and issues related to demographic trends and gender preferences.

The main fields and subfields of Mark A. Fine's work include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Demography
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Safety Research

Their research topics cover a range of themes such as:

  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Mark A. Fine's recent publications include:

  • "Announcing Family Transitions: A Dedicated Outlet Examining the Complexity of Contemporary Family Structures and Changes" (2023) in Journal of Divorce & Remarriage
  • "Distinctions between Scientific Misconduct and Bias in Social Science: Avoidable versus Unavoidable Deviations from Best Practices in Research" (2021) in Marriage & Family Review
  • "The Divorce Process and Child Adaptation Trajectory Typology (DPCATT) Model: The Shaping Role of Predivorce and Postdivorce Interparental Conflict" (2022) in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
  • "Ethnic variations in mothers' and children's positive and negative emotional expressions toward each other" (2020) in Social Development
  • "A Continued and Expanded Focus on Divorce-Related Research: Honoring Traditions and Elevating Discourse" (2024) in Family Transitions

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Mark A. Fine include:

  • Luke Russell
  • Anthony J. Ferraro
  • Hongjian Cao
  • Leslie Anderson
  • Kari Adamsons

Mark A. Fine has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Family Transitions
  • Journal of Family Theory & Review
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
  • Journal of Divorce & Remarriage
  • Marriage & Family Review

Best Publications

  • Reinvestigating Remarriage: Another Decade of Progress

    Marilyn Coleman;Lawrence Ganong;Mark Fine

  • Maternal intrusiveness, maternal warmth, and mother-toddler relationship outcomes: Variations across low-income ethnic and acculturation groups.

    Jean M. Ispa;Mark A. Fine;Linda C. Halgunseth;Scott Harper

  • Reckless driving in adolescence: 'state' and 'trait' factors.

    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett;Daniel Offer;Mark A. Fine

  • Examining Ethnic Identity among Mexican-Origin Adolescents Living in the United States:

    Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor;Mark A. Fine

  • Correlates and Consequences of Spanking and Verbal Punishment for Low-Income White, African American, and Mexican American Toddlers

    Lisa J. Berlin;Jean M. Ispa;Mark A. Fine;Patrick S. Malone

  • Ethnic Identity and Self-Esteem of Latino Adolescents Distinctions Among The Latino Populations

    Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor;Marcelo Diversi;Mark A. Fine;Mark A. Fine

  • School Adjustment in Sixth Graders: Parenting Transitions, Family Climate, and Peer Norm Effects

    Lawrence A. Kurdek;Mark A. Fine;Ronald J. Sinclair

  • Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations

    Mark A. Fine;Lawrence A. Kurdek

  • Methodological implications of grouping Latino adolescents into one collective ethnic group

    Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor;Mark A. Fine

  • Long-Term Effects of Divorce on Parent-Child Relationships

    Mark A. Fine;John R. Moreland;Andrew I. Schwebel

  • Family Acceptance and Family Control as Predictors of Adjustment in Young Adolescents: Linear, Curvilinear, or Interactive Effects?

    Lawrence A. Kurdek;Mark A. Fine

  • Stepparents' Affinity-Seeking and Affinity-Maintaining Strategies With Stepchildren

    Lawrence Ganong;Marilyn Coleman;Mark Fine;Patricia Martin

  • Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution

    Mark A. Fine;John H. Harvey

  • The relation between gender and negative attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: Do gender role attitudes mediate this relation?

    John G. Kerns;Mark A. Fine;Mark A. Fine

  • Consistency in Perceptions of the Step-Parent Role among Step-Parents, Parents and Stepchildren

    Mark A. Fine;Marilyn Coleman;Lawrence H. Ganong

  • When you're not the Brady Bunch: Identifying perceived conflicts and resolution strategies in stepfamilies

    Marilyn Coleman;Mark A. Fine;Lawrence H. Ganong;Kimberly J. M. Downs

  • Handbook of Family Diversity

    David H. Demo;Katherine R. Allen;Mark A. Fine

  • Modeling Parenting Stress Trajectories Among Low-Income Young Mothers Across the Child's Second and Third Years : Factors Accounting for Stability and Change

    Yiting Chang;Mark A. Fine

  • The development and validation of an instrument to assess an optimal Afrocentric world view.

    Derek E. Montgomery;Mark A. Fine;Linda James-Myers

  • The Relation between Family Structure and Young Adolescents' Appraisals of Family Climate and Parenting Behavior.

    Lawrence A. Kurdek;Mark A. Fine

  • Cognition in Close Relationships

    Mark A. Fine;Garth J. O. Fletcher;Frank D. Fincham

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence A. Kurdek
Lawrence A. Kurdek Wright State University
Randy A. Sansone
Randy A. Sansone Wright State University
Marilyn Coleman
Marilyn Coleman University of Missouri
John H. Harvey
John H. Harvey University of Iowa
Lawrence H. Ganong
Lawrence H. Ganong University of Missouri
Xiaoyi Fang
Xiaoyi Fang Beijing Normal University
Patricia Voydanoff
Patricia Voydanoff University of Dayton
Steven K. Huprich
Steven K. Huprich Michigan State University
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor Harvard University
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees in the USA opens up various opportunities for flexible and accelerated career pathways, especially for those interested in becoming counselors. Online programs are increasingly popular, offering both convenience and efficiency for students and working professionals alike.

If your goal is to enter the field quickly, researching state-specific requirements is crucial. For example, you can learn about the quickest path to becoming a counselor in South Dakota or discover the fastest way to become a counselor in Tennessee. Requirements and timelines can vary—from educational prerequisites to field experience—so understanding these differences is essential.

Similarly, prospective students should review options like Texas fastest counseling programs and the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Utah. Each state may offer unique accelerated programs, online coursework, and specialized licensure tracks to help you achieve your career goals in less time.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Fine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles