World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margit Dall Aaslyng

Margit Dall Aaslyng

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
34
Citations
4491
World Ranking
1867
National Ranking
52

Margit Dall Aaslyng publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margit Dall Aaslyng sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 85 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Margit Dall Aaslyng D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margit Dall Aaslyng sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Cooking loss and juiciness of pork in relation to raw meat quality and cooking procedure

    Margit Dall Aaslyng;Camilla Bejerholm;Per Ertbjerg;Hanne C Bertram

  • Meat flavour in pork and beef – From animal to meal

    Unknown

  • Development of inosine monophosphate and its degradation products during aging of pork of different qualities in relation to basic taste and retronasal flavor perception of the meat.

    Meelis Tikk;Kaja Tikk;Mari Ann Tørngren;Lene Meinert

  • Rapid descriptive sensory methods – Comparison of Free Multiple Sorting, Partial Napping, Napping, Flash Profiling and conventional profiling

    Unknown

  • The effect of salt reduction on sensory quality and microbial growth in hotdog sausages, bacon, ham and salami

    Unknown

  • Monitoring of warmed-over flavour in pork using the electronic nose - correlation to sensory attributes and secondary lipid oxidation products

    Kaja Tikk;John-Erik Haugen;Henrik J. Andersen;Henrik J. Andersen;Margit D. Aaslyng

  • The influence of cooking technique and core temperature on results of a sensory analysis of pork—depending on the raw meat quality

    Unknown

  • Effect of prolonged heat treatment from 48°C to 63°C on toughness, cooking loss and color of pork

    Unknown

  • Compensatory growth response in pigs, muscle protein turn-over and meat texture: effects of restriction/realimentation period

    M. Therkildsen;B. Riis;A. Karlsson;L. Kristensen

  • Chemical and sensory characterisation of pan-fried pork flavour: Interactions between raw meat quality, ageing and frying temperature

    Unknown

  • The impact of sensory quality of pork on consumer preference

    Unknown

  • Elucidation of the relationship between cooking temperature, water distribution and sensory attributes of pork: a combined NMR and sensory study

    Hanne Christine Bertram;Margit Dall Aaslyng;Henrik J. Andersen

  • The effect of stress during lairage and stunning on muscle metabolism and drip loss in Danish pork

    Unknown

  • Comparison of glucose, glucose 6-phosphate, ribose, and mannose as flavour precursors in pork; the effect of monosaccharide addition on flavour generation

    Unknown

  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in Danish barbecued meat

    Unknown

  • Classification of wooden breast myopathy in chicken pectoralis major by a standardised method and association with conventional quality assessments

    Line B. Dalgaard;Martin Krøyer Rasmussen;Hanne C. Bertram;Jens A. Jensen

  • Compensatory growth improves meat tenderness in gilts but not in barrows

    L. Kristensen;M. Therkildsen;M. D. Aaslyng;N. Oksbjerg

  • Sensory characteristics of meat cooked for prolonged times at low temperature

    Unknown

  • An NMR-based metabolomics study of pork from different crossbreeds and relation to sensory perception.

    Ida K Straadt;Margit D Aaslyng;Hanne Christine Bertram

  • Protein denaturation and water-protein interactions as affected by low temperature long time treatment of porcine longissimus dorsi.

    Line Christensen;Hanne C. Bertram;Margit D. Aaslyng;Mette Christensen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Animal Science and Veterinary fields, pursuing related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Programs such as the best online mft programs offer flexible education options, demonstrating how online learning is becoming a popular choice across disciplines.

Additionally, advanced study options like an online phd in counseling can complement animal science careers by enhancing communication and behavioral skills, which are valuable when working with clients or managing animal welfare cases.

Exploring jobs with animals highlights a range of career pathways, from veterinary medicine to wildlife conservation. This resource helps prospective students identify roles aligned with their interests and academic background.

Interestingly, leadership roles such as an athletic director also value organizational and team management skills, which intersect with managing animal care programs or educational initiatives within veterinary and zoological institutions.

Recently Published Articles