World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
32
Citations
10342
World Ranking
9591
National Ranking
709

M. J. Waldock publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. J. Waldock sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

M. J. Waldock D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. J. Waldock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. J. Waldock is affiliated with the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science in the United Kingdom. Their work is associated with this institution, which is known for research in environmental science and sustainable fisheries management.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are listed for this researcher. This limits insight into specific studies or ongoing collaborations they may be involved with.

There is no available data on book publications authored by M. J. Waldock, which suggests the research outputs are primarily journal articles or reports affiliated with their institution.

The scientist's specific fields or subfields of study, as well as main topics, have not been provided, so the precise domains within environment, fisheries, or aquaculture that they focus on remain unspecified.

There are no recorded awards or honors for M. J. Waldock in the available data.

The researcher is currently active and not listed as deceased.

Best Publications

  • Identification of Estrogenic Chemicals in STW Effluent. 1. Chemical Fractionation and in Vitro Biological Screening

    C. Desbrow;E. J. Routledge;G. C. Brighty;J. P. Sumpter

  • Identification of Estrogenic Chemicals in STW Effluent. 2. In Vivo Responses in Trout and Roach

    E. J. Routledge;D. Sheahan;C. Desbrow;G. C. Brighty

  • The effect of algal and artificial diets on the growth and fatty acid composition of Crassostrea gigas Spat

    C. J. Langdon;M. J. Waldock

  • Concentrations of alkylphenols in rivers and estuaries in England and Wales

    M.A. Blackburn;M.J. Waldock

  • Long-Term Temporal Changes in the Estrogenic Composition of Treated Sewage Effluent and Its Biological Effects on Fish

    Trevor P. Rodgers-Gray;Susan Jobling;Steven Morris;Carole Kelly

  • Shell thickening in Crassostrea gigas: Organotin antifouling or sediment induced?

    M.J. Waldock;J.E. Thain

  • Exposure of Juvenile Roach (Rutilus Rutilus) to Treated Sewage Effluent Induces Dose-Dependent and Persistent Disruption in Gonadal Duct Development

    Trevor P. Rodgers-Gray;Susan Jobling;Carole Kelly;Steven Morris

  • Antifouling paint booster biocides in UK coastal waters: inputs, occurrence and environmental fate

    Kevin V Thomas;Mathew McHugh;Mike Waldock

  • Concentrations of alkyphenol polyethoxylates entering UK estuaries

    M.A Blackburn;S.J Kirby;M.J Waldock

  • Scope for growth and contaminant levels in North Sea mussels Mytilus edulis

    Widdows J;Donkin P;Brinsley;Evans Sv

  • Antifouling paint booster biocides in the UK coastal environment and potential risks of biological effects.

    Kevin V. Thomas;T. I. M. W. Fileman;James W. Readman;Mike J. Waldock

  • An assessment of in vitro androgenic activity and the identification of environmental androgens in United Kingdom estuaries.

    Kevin V. Thomas;Mark R. Hurst;Peter Matthiessen;Mathew McHugh

  • Reductions in TBT concentrations in UK estuaries following legislation in 1986 and 1987

    M.E. Waite;M.J. Waldock;J.E. Thain;D.J. Smith

  • Antifouling Paint Booster Biocide Contamination in UK Marine Sediments

    Kevin V Thomas;Sylvia J Blake;Michael J Waldock

  • Fatty acid metabolism in young oysters, Crassostrea gigas: polyunsaturated fatty acids

    M. J. Waldock;D. L. Holland

  • Characterization of estrogenic compounds in water samples collected from United Kingdom estuaries

    Kevin V. Thomas;Mark R. Hurst;Peter Matthiessen;Mike J. Waldock

  • The distribution and potential toxic effects of TBT in UK estuaries during 1986

    M J Waldock;J E Thain;M E Waite

  • Surveys of plasma vitellogenin and intersex in male flounder (Platichthys flesus) as measures of endocrine disruption by estrogenic contamination in United Kingdom estuaries: Temporal trends, 1996 to 2001

    Mark F. Kirby;Yvonne T. Allen;Robert A. Dyer;Steve W. Feist

  • Increased persistence of antifouling paint biocides when associated with paint particles.

    Kevin V Thomas;Mathew McHugh;Martin Hilton;Mike Waldock

  • The Impact of Tributyl Tin (TBT) Antifouling Paints on Molluscan Fisheries

    J. E. Thain;M. J. Waldock

  • Estrogenic activity measured in a sewage treatment works treating industrial inputs containing high concentrations of alkylphenolic compounds—A case study

    David A. Sheahan;Geoff C. Brighty;Mic Daniel;Sonia J. Kirby

  • Reduction in the estrogenic activity of a treated sewage effluent discharge to an English river as a result of a decrease in the concentration of industrially derived surfactants.

    David A. Sheahan;Geoff C. Brighty;Mic Daniel;Susan Jobling

  • TBT causes regime shift in shallow lakes.

    Carl D. Sayer;Daniel J. Hoare;Gavin L. Simpson;and Andrew C. G. Henderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin V. Thomas
Kevin V. Thomas University of Queensland
John P. Sumpter
John P. Sumpter Brunel University London
Robin J. Law
Robin J. Law Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
Carl D. Sayer
Carl D. Sayer University College London
Susan Jobling
Susan Jobling Brunel University London
Peter G. Appleby
Peter G. Appleby University of Liverpool
John M. Huthnance
John M. Huthnance National Oceanography Centre
Charles R. Tyler
Charles R. Tyler University of Exeter
John Boyle
John Boyle University of Liverpool
Gavin Simpson
Gavin Simpson University of Regina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Many students seek flexible and affordable options, making programs like the cheapest dsw program attractive for advanced social work roles that intersect with community and environmental advocacy.

If you’re looking for broader educational options that still complement environmental careers, a low cost online general studies degree offers a flexible pathway to gain multidisciplinary knowledge. This can enhance your understanding of sustainability, policy, and science related fields.

For students concerned about program difficulty, the easiest bachelor degree selections might be worth exploring. These programs provide accessible entry points into higher education while still paving the way for environmental science careers.

Lastly, for more specialized study, pursuing one of the best online geology degree programs offers tailored expertise in earth sciences—a critical foundation for many environmental science roles.

Best Scientists Citing M. J. Waldock

Recently Published Articles