World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
12235
World Ranking
6367
National Ranking
379

M. Angela Sasse publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Angela Sasse sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 164 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

M. Angela Sasse D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Angela Sasse sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Angela Sasse is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of computer science and social sciences. Their research spans subfields including information systems, sociology and political science, signal processing, artificial intelligence, and computer networks and communications.

The main thematic areas covered in their work include privacy, security, and data protection; information and cyber security; advanced malware detection techniques; user authentication and security systems; cybercrime and law enforcement studies; stalking, cyberstalking, and harassment; and the intersections of social media and politics.

Frequent publication venues for M. Angela Sasse encompass arXiv (Cornell University), with six publications, the 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), the New Security Paradigms Workshop, IEEE Security & Privacy, and Empirical Software Engineering.

Significant recent papers by this researcher are:

  • How Does Usable Security (Not) End Up in Software Products? Results From a Qualitative Interview Study, 2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • "Taking out the Trash": Why Security Behavior Change requires Intentional Forgetting, 2021, New Security Paradigms Workshop
  • Getting Users Smart Quick about Security: Results from 90 Minutes of Using a Persuasive Toolkit for Facilitating Information Security Problem Solving by Non-Professionals, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Digital Security -- A Question of Perspective. A Large-Scale Telephone Survey with Four At-Risk User Groups, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Adoption Challenges for Cryptographic Protocols, 2024, IEEE Security & Privacy

Key collaborators include Jonas Hielscher, Yasemin Acar, Marco Gutfleisch, Sascha Fahl, and Annalina Buckmann.

Among their scholarly contributions, M. Angela Sasse has published a book titled Computer Security. ESORICS 2021 International Workshops, released by Springer Science+Business Media in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Transforming the ‘Weakest Link’ — a Human/Computer Interaction Approach to Usable and Effective Security

    Unknown

  • The mechanics of trust: a framework for research and design

    Jens Riegelsberger;M. Angela Sasse;John D. McCarthy

  • "Stuff goes into the computer and doesn't come out": a cross-tool study of personal information management

    Richard Boardman;M. Angela Sasse

  • Are Passfaces More Usable Than Passwords? A Field Trial Investigation

    Sacha Brostoff;M Angela Sasse

  • The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment

    Maia Garau;Mel Slater;Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy;Andrea Brogni

  • The true cost of unusable password policies: password use in the wild

    Unknown

  • The impact of eye gaze on communication using humanoid avatars

    Maia Garau;Mel Slater;Simon Bee;Martina Angela Sasse

  • The researcher's dilemma: evaluating trust in computer-mediated communication

    Jens Riegelsberger;M. Angela Sasse;John D. McCarthy

  • Shiny happy people building trust?: photos on e-commerce websites and consumer trust

    Jens Riegelsberger;M. Angela Sasse;John D. McCarthy

  • Measuring perceived quality of speech and video in multimedia conferencing applications

    Anne Watson;M. Angela Sasse

  • Sharp or smooth?: comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video

    John D. McCarthy;M. Angela Sasse;Dimitrios Miras

  • Security Education against Phishing: A Modest Proposal for a Major Rethink

    Iacovos Kirlappos;M. Angela Sasse

  • Can small be beautiful?: assessing image resolution requirements for mobile TV

    Hendrik Knoche;John D. McCarthy;M. Angela Sasse

  • Obstacles to the Adoption of Secure Communication Tools

    Ruba Abu-Salma;M. Angela Sasse;Joseph Bonneau;Anastasia Danilova

  • Bringing security home: a process for developing secure and usable systems

    Ivan Flechais;M. Angela Sasse;Stephen M. V. Hailes

  • Could I have the Menu Please? An Eye Tracking Study of Design Conventions

    John D. McCarthy;M. Angela Sasse;Jens Riegelsberger

  • Safe and sound: a safety-critical approach to security

    Sacha Brostoff;M. Angela Sasse

  • Do Users Always Know What’s Good For Them? Utilising Physiological Responses to Assess Media Quality

    Gillian May Wilson;M. Angela Sasse

  • Learning from "Shadow Security": Why understanding non-compliant behaviors provides the basis for effective security

    Iacovos Kirlappos;Simon Parkin;M. Angela Sasse

  • Don't work. Can't work? Why it's time to rethink security warnings

    Kat Krol;Matthew Moroz;M. Angela Sasse

  • Accounting for taste: using profile similarity to improve recommender systems

    Philip Bonhard;Clare Harries;John McCarthy;M. Angela Sasse

  • "They brought in the horrible key ring thing!" Analysing the Usability of Two-Factor Authentication in UK Online Banking

    Kat Krol;Eleni Philippou;Emiliano De Cristofaro;M. Angela Sasse

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Smith
Matthew Smith University of Bonn
Joseph Bonneau
Joseph Bonneau New York University
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson University of Cambridge
James Noble
James Noble Victoria University of Wellington
Awais Rashid
Awais Rashid University of Bristol
Gianluca Stringhini
Gianluca Stringhini Boston University
Emiliano De Cristofaro
Emiliano De Cristofaro University of California, Riverside
Shari Lawrence Pfleeger
Shari Lawrence Pfleeger Dartmouth College
Adrian Furnham
Adrian Furnham BI Norwegian Business School
Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli
Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a computer science degree online offers flexibility and a range of career options. Many students are concerned about cost, but there are numerous affordable online courses that make earning a degree more accessible than ever. These programs often allow you to balance work, family, and education without sacrificing quality.

If your academic history includes a less-than-perfect GPA, don’t worry. There are online colleges that accept low GPA applicants, expanding opportunities for more students to enter the field.

Computer science skills are highly transferable, opening doors to roles in technology, research, and even interdisciplinary areas like environmental science. Explore your options and discover what you can do with an environmental science degree if you’re interested in combining tech with sustainability.

For those wanting to accelerate their studies, look into accelerated computer science degree programs. These intensive courses help you graduate faster and start your career sooner.

Best Scientists Citing M. Angela Sasse

Trending Scientists