World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tamer Demiralp

Tamer Demiralp

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
6945
World Ranking
8732
National Ranking
10

Tamer Demiralp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamer Demiralp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 182 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tamer Demiralp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamer Demiralp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tamer Demiralp is affiliated with Istanbul University in Turkey and works primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their research interests concentrate largely on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, as well as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, with a focus on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces. Other significant areas include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research.

The scientist has contributed multiple recent papers to diverse academic journals. Notable publications include:

  • The cerebral blood flow deficits in Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment using arterial spin labeling MRI, 2020, Journal of Neural Transmission
  • Default mode and dorsal attention network involvement in visually guided motor sequence learning, 2021, Cortex
  • Evoked and induced EEG oscillations to visual targets reveal a differential pattern of change along the spectrum of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's Disease, 2020, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Comparison of FreeSurfer and CAT12 Software in Parcel-Based Cortical Thickness Calculations, 2022, Brain Topography
  • Detection of visual and frontoparietal network perfusion deficits in Parkinson's disease dementia, 2021, European Journal of Radiology

Tamer Demiralp often collaborates with several coauthors including Hakan Gürvıt, Elif Kurt, Çiğdem Ulaşoğlu-Yıldız, Emre Harı, and Ali Bayram. These collaborations have resulted in numerous joint publications.

Frequent publication venues for the scientist include:

  • Nöro Psikiyatri Arşivi
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Neurological Sciences
  • European Journal of Radiology

Best Publications

  • Human EEG gamma oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders.

    C.S. Herrmann;T. Demiralp

  • Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans.

    Tolgay Ergenoglu;Tamer Demiralp;Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu;Mehmet Ergen

  • P300-response: possible psychophysiological correlates in delta and theta frequency channels. A review.

    Canan Başar-Eroglu;Erol Başar;Tamer Demiralp;Martin Schürmann

  • Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: Decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention

    Elif Kirmizi-Alsan;Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu;Hakan Gurvit;Yasemin H. Keskin

  • Gamma amplitudes are coupled to theta phase in human EEG during visual perception.

    Tamer Demiralp;Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu;Daniel Lenz;Stefanie Junge

  • Classification of electroencephalogram signals with combined time and frequency features

    Zafer Iscan;Zümray Dokur;Tamer Demiralp

  • Event-related oscillations are ‘real brain responses’ — wavelet analysis and new strategies

    Erol Basar;Martin Schürmann;Tamer Demiralp;Canan Basar-Eroglu

  • Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b.

    Tamer Demiralp;Ahmet Ademoglu;Marco Comerchero;John Polich

  • Cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: evidence from neuropsychological investigation and event-related potentials.

    Hasmet A Hanagasi;I.Hakan Gurvit;Numan Ermutlu;Gulustu Kaptanoglu

  • Time-frequency analysis reveals multiple functional components during oddball P300.

    Vasil Kolev;Tamer Demiralp;Juliana Yordanova;Ahmet Ademoglu

  • Wavelet analysis of oddball P300.

    Tamer Demiralp;Ahmet Ademoglu;Yorgo Istefanopulos;Canan Başar-Eroglu

  • Detection of P300 waves in single trials by the wavelet transform (WT).

    Tamer Demiralp;Tamer Demiralp;Ahmet Ademoglu;Martin Schürmann;Canan Basar-Eroglu

  • Oscillatory brain dynamics, wavelet analysis, and cognition.

    Erol Basar;Tamer Demiralp;Tamer Demiralp;Martin Schürmann;Canan Basar-Eroglu

  • Time-frequency analysis of single-sweep event-related potentials by means of fast wavelet transform.

    Tamer Demiralp;Tamer Demiralp;Juliana Yordanova;Vasil Kolev;Ahmet Ademoglu

  • Theta rhythmicities following expected visual and auditory targets.

    Tamer Demiralp;Erol Başar

  • DRD4 and DAT1 Polymorphisms Modulate Human Gamma Band Responses

    Tamer Demiralp;Tamer Demiralp;Christoph Herrmann;M. Erdal;Tolgay Ergenoglu

  • Event-related theta oscillations: an integrative and comparative approach in the human and animal brain.

    Canan Başar-Eroglu;Tamer Demiralp

  • Spontaneous EEG theta activity controls frontal visual evoked potential amplitudes

    Erol Başar;Elke Rahn;Tamer Demiralp;Martin Schürmann

  • P3 and delta band responses in visual oddball paradigm in schizophrenia

    Mehmet Ergen;Sonja Marbach;Andreas Brand;Canan Başar-Eroğlu

  • Electroencephalographic differences between WAG/Rij and GAERS rat models of absence epilepsy

    Ozlem Akman;Tamer Demiralp;Nurbay Ates;Filiz Yilmaz Onat

  • The phase-locking of auditory gamma band responses in humans is sensitive to task processing

    Juliana Yordanova;Vasil Kolev;Tamer Demiralp

Frequent Co-Authors

Canan Basar-Eroglu
Canan Basar-Eroglu University of Bremen
Erol Başar
Erol Başar Istanbul Kültür University
Martin Schürmann
Martin Schürmann University of Nottingham
Vasil Kolev
Vasil Kolev Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Juliana Yordanova
Juliana Yordanova Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Betül Baykan
Betül Baykan Istanbul University
Christoph Herrmann
Christoph Herrmann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Bahar Güntekin
Bahar Güntekin Istanbul Medipol University
John Polich
John Polich Scripps Research Institute
Görsev Yener
Görsev Yener Dokuz Eylül University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Neuroscience but seeking flexible or alternative career routes, several online degrees can expand your options. Careers in mental health, counseling, and social services often overlap with neuroscience knowledge and provide meaningful opportunities to make a difference.

If you’re interested in supporting communities and individuals, consider exploring online social work programs. These provide the training to become a licensed social worker and open doors to a variety of health and advocacy roles.

Those drawn to mental health careers may also find value in an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree. This pathway allows you to gain foundational psychology knowledge quickly and can be a stepping stone towards advanced study or counseling roles.

For more specialized careers in counseling, enrolling in cacrep accredited programs online ensures you meet professional standards necessary for licensure. Additionally, online counseling degree accredited options provide affordable and reputable ways to become a certified counselor.

Each of these pathways complements a neuroscience background and increases your qualifications for in-demand, rewarding roles.

Best Scientists Citing Tamer Demiralp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles