World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9080 8482 4815 4382 97 7897

Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2020. 12 of the 109 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2020. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
2000 2025

109 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 3
2007 5
2008 1
2009 4
2010 1
2011 3
2012 4
2013 3
2014 5
2015 6
2016 5
2017 4
2018 5
2019 4
2020 12
2021 11
2022 7
2023 10
2024 7
2025 5
Total 109
Download as CSV

Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 97
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with extensive work in Clinical Psychology, Education, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Health, Toxicology, and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's main research topics include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Early Childhood Education and Development, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Infant Health and Development, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Noise Effects and Management, and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Xutong Zhang, Nilàm Ram, Margaret M. Swingler, Rosalind J. Wright, and Lisa P. Jacobson.

Their work is frequently published in several key venues, such as Psychophysiology, Biological Psychology, JAMA Network Open, International Journal of Psychophysiology, and Developmental Psychology.

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp include:

  • Parental support of self-regulation among children at risk for externalizing symptoms: Developmental trajectories of physiological regulation and behavioral adjustment, 2020, Developmental Psychology
  • Capturing emotion coherence in daily life: Using ambulatory physiology measures and ecological momentary assessments to examine within-person associations and individual differences, 2021, Biological Psychology
  • Environmental tobacco smoke exposure is associated with increased levels of metals in children's saliva, 2023, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
  • Incidence rates of childhood asthma with recurrent exacerbations in the US Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, 2023, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • Concordance of mother-child respiratory sinus arrythmia is continually moderated by dynamic changes in emotional content of film stimuli, 2021, Biological Psychology

Best Publications

  • The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescent Boys.

    Adrian Raine;Kenneth A. Dodge;Rolf Loeber;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp

  • Polyvagal Theory and developmental psychopathology: emotion dysregulation and conduct problems from preschool to adolescence.

    Theodore P. Beauchaine;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp;Hilary K. Mead

  • Multifinality in the Development of Personality Disorders: A Biology × Sex × Environment Interaction Model of Antisocial and Borderline Traits

    Theodore P. Beauchaine;Daniel N. Klein;Sheila E. Crowell;Christina Derbidge

  • Ten good reasons to consider biological processes in prevention and intervention research

    Theodore P. Beauchaine;Emily Neuhaus;Sharon L. Brenner;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp

  • The dynamics of internalizing and externalizing comorbidity across the early school years

    Cynthia J. Willner;Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Bethany C. Bray

  • Autonomic correlates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder in preschool children

    Sheila E. Crowell;Theodore P. Beauchaine;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp;Patrick Sylvers

  • Correspondence between physiological and self-report measures of emotion dysregulation: A longitudinal investigation of youth with and without psychopathology

    Christina A. Vasilev;Sheila E. Crowell;Theodore P. Beauchaine;Hilary K. Mead

  • Familial and temperamental predictors of resilience in children at risk for conduct disorder and depression

    Katherine E. Shannon;Theodore P. Beauchaine;Sharon L. Brenner;Emily Neuhaus

  • Sympathetic- and Parasympathetic-Linked Cardiac Function and Prediction of Externalizing Behavior, Emotion Regulation, and Prosocial Behavior Among Preschoolers Treated for ADHD

    Theodore P. Beauchaine;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp;Emily Neuhaus;Jane Chipman

  • Neurological correlates of reward responding in adolescents with and without externalizing behavior disorders.

    Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Theodore P. Beauchaine;Katherine E. Shannon;Jane Chipman

  • Quantifying respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Effects of misspecifying breathing frequencies across development.

    Tiffany M. Shader;Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Sheila E. Crowell;M. Jamila Reid

  • Instantiating the multiple levels of analysis perspective in a program of study on externalizing behavior.

    Theodore P. Beauchaine;Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp

  • Early adversity, RSA, and inhibitory control: Evidence of children's neurobiological sensitivity to social context

    Elizabeth A. Skowron;Elizabeth Cipriano-Essel;Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Douglas M. Teti

  • The canary in the coalmine: the sensitivity of mesolimbic dopamine to environmental adversity during development.

    Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp

  • Direct and passive prenatal nicotine exposure and the development of externalizing psychopathology.

    Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Theodore P. Beauchaine

  • Serious delinquent behavior, sensation seeking, and electrodermal arousal

    Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Adrian Raine;Rolf Loeber;Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

  • Associations between respiratory sinus arrhythmia reactivity and internalizing and externalizing symptoms are emotion specific

    Christine K. Fortunato;Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Nilam Ram

  • Estimating time-varying RSA to examine psychophysiological linkage of marital dyads.

    Kathleen M. Gates;Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Maria Sandsten;Alysia Y. Blandon

  • Mapping cardiac physiology and parenting processes in maltreating mother–child dyads.

    Elizabeth A. Skowron;Eric Loken;Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Elizabeth A. Cipriano-Essel

  • EEG Asymmetry in Borderline Personality Disorder and Depression Following Rejection

    Joseph E. Beeney;Kenneth N. Levy;Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp;Michael N. Hallquist

  • BRIEF REPORTS Autonomic Correlates of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Preschool Children

    Sheila E. Crowell;Theodore P. Beauchaine;Lisa Gatzke-Kopp;Patrick Sylvers

Frequent Co-Authors

Theodore P. Beauchaine
Theodore P. Beauchaine The Ohio State University
Sidney J. Segalowitz
Sidney J. Segalowitz Brock University
Nilam Ram
Nilam Ram Stanford University
Sheila E. Crowell
Sheila E. Crowell University of Oregon
Mark T. Greenberg
Mark T. Greenberg Pennsylvania State University
Adrian Raine
Adrian Raine University of Pennsylvania
Elizabeth A. Skowron
Elizabeth A. Skowron University of Oregon
Michael T. Willoughby
Michael T. Willoughby RTI International
Karen L. Bierman
Karen L. Bierman Pennsylvania State University
Clancy Blair
Clancy Blair New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in flexible education grows, online psychology programs across the USA have surged in popularity. These degrees provide a convenient option for students balancing work, family, or geographic constraints, while also offering robust curricula that cover both foundational theory and practical application.

Choosing the right program is crucial. For students in the Northeast, exploring the best online psychology degree rankings in Massachusetts can help identify top schools with strong accreditation and faculty expertise. On the West Coast, comparing the best online psychology master's program rankings in California reveals institutions that focus on current research trends and specialized training.

If you’re in the South, consider reviewing online psychology master's degrees in Florida, which often emphasize multicultural competence and clinical practicums. Students in the Midwest should explore online psychology master's programs in Kansas for flexible pathways and opportunities in counseling, research, and education.

Graduates can pursue careers in mental health services, human resources, research, and even corporate consulting. With remote learning opening more doors than ever, online psychology degrees serve as a gateway to diverse and rewarding professional roles.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles