World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
10527
World Ranking
5706
National Ranking
611

Lina M. Mercado publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lina M. Mercado sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 123 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Lina M. Mercado D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lina M. Mercado sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lina M. Mercado is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and has an extensive publication record primarily focused on environmental and agricultural sciences. Their research engages deeply with topics related to plant water relations, carbon dynamics, and global and planetary change.

Their recent scientific contributions include studies published in leading journals, such as:

  • "Direct evidence for phosphorus limitation on Amazon forest productivity" (2022, Nature)
  • "Rapid responses of root traits and productivity to phosphorus and cation additions in a tropical lowland forest in Amazonia" (2020, New Phytologist)
  • "Historical and future global burned area with changing climate and human demography" (2021, One Earth)
  • "A multi-data assessment of land use and land cover emissions from Brazil during 2000-2019" (2021, Environmental Research Letters)
  • "Fragmentation-Driven Divergent Trends in Burned Area in Amazonia and Cerrado" (2022, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change)

Their research spans an interdisciplinary approach across several main fields of study, including:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these, Mercado contributes notably to multiple specialized subfields, such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Plant Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Ecology

Their main topics of study highlight a focus on:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Climate variability and models

Mercado frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Stephen Sitch, Patrick Meir, Iain P. Hartley, Dan Bruhn, and Zorayda Restrepo. These collaborations indicate ongoing partnerships across related environmental and biological sciences fields.

Their publications have appeared in several notable venues, demonstrating a broad engagement with multidisciplinary research platforms. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • New Phytologist
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • Global Change Biology

Best Publications

  • The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes

    M. J. Best;M. Pryor;D. B. Clark;G. G. Rooney

  • Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink

    Lina M. Mercado;Nicolas Bellouin;Stephen Sitch;Olivier Boucher

  • The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics

    D. B. Clark;L. M. Mercado;S. Sitch;C. D. Jones

  • Simulated resilience of tropical rainforests to CO2-induced climate change

    Chris Huntingford;Przemyslaw Zelazowski;David Galbraith;David Galbraith;Lina M. Mercado

  • A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models

    Alistair Rogers;Belinda E. Medlyn;Jeffrey S. Dukes;Gordon Bonan

  • Global variability in leaf respiration in relation to climate, plant functional types and leaf traits

    Owen K. Atkin;Keith J. Bloomfield;Peter B. Reich;Peter B. Reich;Mark G. Tjoelker

  • Basin-wide variations in foliar properties of Amazonian forest: phylogeny, soils and climate.

    N. M. Fyllas;S. Patiño;S. Patiño;T. R. Baker;G. Bielefeld Nardoto

  • Acclimation and adaptation components of the temperature dependence of plant photosynthesis at the global scale

    Dushan P. Kumarathunge;Belinda E. Medlyn;John E. Drake;Mark G. Tjoelker

  • Amazon forest response to CO2 fertilization dependent on plant phosphorus acquisition

    Katrin Fleischer;Anja Rammig;Martin G. De Kauwe;Anthony P. Walker

  • Direct evidence for phosphorus limitation on Amazon forest productivity

    Unknown

  • Towards quantifying uncertainty in predictions of Amazon dieback

    Chris Huntingford;Rosie A. Fisher;Lina Mercado;Ben B. B. Booth

  • Improved representation of plant functional types and physiology in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES v4.2) using plant trait information

    Anna B. Harper;Peter M. Cox;Pierre Friedlingstein;Andy J. Wiltshire

  • Enhanced global primary production by biogenic aerosol via diffuse radiation fertilization

    A. Rap;C. E. Scott;C. L. Reddington;L. Mercado

  • Optimisation of photosynthetic carbon gain and within-canopy gradients of associated foliar traits for Amazon forest trees

    J. Lloyd;S. Patiño;R. Q. Paiva;G. B. Nardoto

  • Tropical forest and peatland conservation in Indonesia: Challenges and directions

    Mark E. Harrison;Juliarta Bramansa Ottay;Laura J. D’Arcy;Susan M. Cheyne

  • Implications of improved representations of plant respiration in a changing climate

    Chris Huntingford;Owen K. Atkin;Alberto Martinez-de la Torre;Lina M. Mercado

  • Branch xylem density variations across the Amazon Basin

    S. Patino;S. Patino;S. Patino;J. Lloyd;R. Paiva;T. R. Baker;T. R. Baker

  • Leaf dry matter content is better at predicting above-ground net primary production than specific leaf area

    Simon Mark Smart;Helen Catherine Glanville;Maria del Carmen Blanes;Lina Maria Mercado

  • Fires increase Amazon forest productivity through increases in diffuse radiation

    A. Rap;D.V. Spracklen;Lina M. Mercado;C.L. Reddington

  • Improving the representation of radiation interception and photosynthesis for climate model applications

    Lina M. Mercado;Chris Huntingford;John H. C. Gash;Peter M. Cox

  • Analysing Amazonian forest productivity using a new individual and trait-based model (TFS v.1)

    N. M. Fyllas;N. M. Fyllas;E. Gloor;L. M. Mercado;S. Sitch

  • Large sensitivity in land carbon storage due to geographical and temporal variation in the thermal response of photosynthetic capacity.

    Lina M. Mercado;Belinda E. Medlyn;Belinda E. Medlyn;Chris Huntingford;Rebecca J. Oliver

  • Variations in Amazon forest productivity correlated with foliar nutrients and modelled rates of photosynthetic carbon supply

    Lina M. Mercado;Sandra Patiño;Tomas F. Domingues;Nikolaos M. Fyllas

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Sitch
Stephen Sitch University of Exeter
Chris Huntingford
Chris Huntingford Natural Environment Research Council
Peter M. Cox
Peter M. Cox University of Exeter
Patrick Meir
Patrick Meir University of Edinburgh
Jon Lloyd
Jon Lloyd Imperial College London
Carlos A. Quesada
Carlos A. Quesada National Institute of Amazonian Research
Yadvinder Malhi
Yadvinder Malhi University of Oxford
Olivier Boucher
Olivier Boucher Sorbonne University
Luiz E. O. C. Aragão
Luiz E. O. C. Aragão National Institute for Space Research
Belinda E. Medlyn
Belinda E. Medlyn Western Sydney University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse careers, but related fields also offer rewarding opportunities. Many students interested in environmental sciences choose to pursue supportive and complementary degrees online. For example, programs like an affordable masters in counseling programs can prepare graduates to address conservation challenges with a focus on human behavior and community well-being.

Other pathways, such as online clinical psychology programs and an online degree in human services, can help graduates incorporate psychological insights and social support systems in ecological initiatives. These degrees provide flexibility for those looking to study while working or changing fields.

If you’re considering career shifts, you may wonder: can you become a speech pathologist with an education degree? This illustrates how interdisciplinary backgrounds can open doors in ecology, education, health, and communication. Whether entering directly or through a related profession, online degrees offer broad and flexible pathways to make an impact.

Best Scientists Citing Lina M. Mercado

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles