World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
14271
World Ranking
13041
National Ranking
5560

Kurt Randerath publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Randerath sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 222 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kurt Randerath D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Randerath sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kurt Randerath is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their academic and research profile is centered within this institution, contributing to its scientific community.

Available data does not list specific research papers authored by Kurt Randerath, nor does it provide information about frequent co-authors or preferred publication venues. Similarly, there is no record of book publications or awards linked to their career in the provided data.

The fields of study and main research topics that Kurt Randerath focuses on have not been detailed in the information available. No subfields or specialized areas have been identified from the source data either.

Despite the lack of detailed bibliographic and thematic data, the association with Baylor College of Medicine positions Kurt Randerath within a well-established research environment, typically involved in biomedical and medical sciences.

Best Publications

  • Nuclease P1-mediated enhancement of sensitivity of 32P-postlabeling test for structurally diverse DNA adducts.

    M.Vijayaraj Reddy;Kurt Randerath

  • 32P-postlabeling analysis of non-radioactive aromatic carcinogen — DNA adducts

    R.C. Gupta;M.V. Reddy;K. Randerath

  • 32P-labeling test for DNA damage.

    K Randerath;M V Reddy;R C Gupta

  • [40] Thin-layer separation methods for nucleic acid derivatives

    Kurt Randerath;Erika Randerath

  • Detection of smoking-related covalent DNA adducts in human placenta

    Richard B. Everson;Erika Randerath;Regina M. Santella;Robert C. Cefalo

  • 32P-postlabeling analysis of DNA adducts persisting for up to 42 weeks in the skin, epidermis and dermis of mice treated topically with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene.

    Erika Randerath;Hari P. Agrawal;James A. Weaver;Cassius B. Bordelon

  • DNA adducts and chronic degenerative diseases. Pathogenetic relevance and implications in preventive medicine

    Silvio De Flora;Alberto Izzotti;Kurt Randerath;Erika Randerath

  • Postlabeling Methods for Carcinogen-DNA Adduct Analysis

    K Randerath;E Randerath;H P Agrawal;R C Gupta

  • DNA adducts in humans environmentally exposed to aromatic compounds in an industrial area of Poland

    Kari Hemminki;E. Grzybowska;M. Chorazy;K. Twardowska-saucha

  • Endogenous formation and significance of 1,N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adducts.

    Fung-Lung Chung;Raghu G Nath;Minako Nagao;Akiyoshi Nishikawa

  • Estrogen-induced endogenous DNA adduction: possible mechanism of hormonal cancer

    J G Liehr;T A Avitts;E Randerath;K Randerath

  • Isolation and characterization of dinucleoside tetra- and tri-phosphates formed in the presence of lysyl-sRNA synthetase.

    Kurt Randerath;Claude M. Janeway;Mary L. Stephenson;Paul C. Zamecnik

  • 32P-Postlabeling Assay in Mice of Transplacental DNA Damage Induced by the Environmental Carcinogens Safrole, 4-Aminobiphenyl, and Benzo(a)pyrene

    Leejane Lu;R. M. Disher;M. V. Reddy;K. Randerath

  • A new sensitive 32P-postlabeling assay based on the specific enzymatic conversion of bulky DNA lesions to radiolabeled dinucleotides and nucleoside 5'-monophosphates

    K. Randerath;E. Randerath;T. F. Danna;K. L. Van Golen

  • 32P-postlabeling methods for DNA adduct detection: overview and critical evaluation.

    Kurt Randerath;Erika Randerath

  • Rapid print-readout technique for sequencing of RNA's containing modified nucleotides.

    Ramesh C. Gupta;Kurt Randerath

  • Comparative 32P-Analysis of Cigarette Smoke-induced DNA Damage in Human Tissues and Mouse Skin

    Erika Randerath;Tommie A. Avitts;M. Vijayaraj Reddy;Robert H. Miller

  • Structural origins of bulky oxidative DNA adducts (type II I-compounds) as deduced by oxidation of oligonucleotides of known sequence.

    Kurt Randerath;Erika Randerath;Charles V. Smith;Jian Chang

  • Tamoxifen: evidence by 32P-postlabeling and use of metabolic inhibitors for two distinct pathways leading to mouse hepatic DNA adduct formation and identification of 4-hydroxytamoxifen as a proximate metabolite.

    K. Randerath;B. Moorthy;N. Mabon;P. Sriram

  • Tamoxifen Metabolic Activation: Comparison of DNA Adducts Formed by Microsomal and Chemical Activation of Tamoxifen and 4-Hydroxytamoxifen with DNA Adducts Formed in Vivo

    Bhagavatula Moorthy;Padmavathi Sriram;Deena N. Pathak;William J. Bodell

Frequent Co-Authors

Ramesh C. Gupta
Ramesh C. Gupta University of Louisville
Kari Hemminki
Kari Hemminki Charles University
Daniel Medina
Daniel Medina Baylor College of Medicine
David H. Phillips
David H. Phillips King's College London
Harold P. Morris
Harold P. Morris Howard University
Stephen Safe
Stephen Safe Texas A&M University
Regina M. Santella
Regina M. Santella Columbia University
Bruce A. Roe
Bruce A. Roe University of Oklahoma
Harry W. Schroeder
Harry W. Schroeder University of Alabama at Birmingham
Minako Nagao
Minako Nagao National Cancer Research Institute, UK

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry often opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and specialized career tracks in healthcare and science. For those interested in nutrition, advancing your expertise is easier than ever, with flexible nutrition masters online programs designed to fit your schedule and budget. These programs provide in-depth knowledge in food science, wellness, and diet planning.

Allied health fields also offer promising career options. Becoming an ultrasound technician is a popular choice, and you can begin your journey with accredited ultrasound tech school programs available fully online. If radiology interests you, consider the cheapest radiology tech programs offering associate degrees at affordable rates—an efficient entry point into the field.

For those aiming to specialize in dietetics, pursuing one of the top dietetics masters programs can enhance both your credentials and career opportunities. No matter what path you choose, online degrees are making it easier than ever to gain qualifications for high-demand careers in biology, health, and wellness.

Best Scientists Citing Kurt Randerath

Recently Published Articles