World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8212 7721 4255 3941 598 41876

Kevin A. Schulman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kevin A. Schulman between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kevin A. Schulman published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 17.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 52 publications in 2008. 32 of the 682 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 52. Peak 52 publications in 2008. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 27 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 21 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 24 publications 2004: 33 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 41 publications 2008: 52 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 7 publications
1988 2026

682 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kevin A. Schulman: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 3
1991 5
1992 3
1993 1
1994 6
1995 10
1996 16
1997 13
1998 27
1999 21
2000 21
2001 17
2002 14
2003 24
2004 33
2005 28
2006 25
2007 41
2008 52
2009 28
2010 28
2011 27
2012 28
2013 21
2014 16
2015 9
2016 13
2017 23
2018 4
2019 6
2020 12
2021 14
2022 21
2023 19
2024 19
2025 25
2026 7
Total 682
Download as CSV

Kevin A. Schulman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin A. Schulman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 598 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 598
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kevin A. Schulman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin A. Schulman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Kevin A. Schulman is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spans the intersection of economics, econometrics, finance, and medicine, with a considerable focus on healthcare policy and management, health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Their publication record includes articles in prominent venues such as JAMA, Health Services Research, New England Journal of Medicine, arXiv, and JAMA Internal Medicine. Schulman has contributed extensively to these journals, with 15 publications in JAMA, 8 in Health Services Research, 6 in the New England Journal of Medicine, 5 in arXiv, and 4 in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Recent papers highlight several aspects of healthcare and public health challenges, including:

  • "Covid-19 and Health Care's Digital Revolution" (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Global maps of travel time to healthcare facilities" (2020, Nature Medicine)
  • "Beyond Politics - Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination in the United States" (2021, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems" (2020, JAMA Internal Medicine)
  • "Ethical issues in using ambient intelligence in health-care settings" (2020, The Lancet Digital Health)

Frequent co-authors collaborated with Schulman on numerous publications include:

  • Barak D. Richman
  • Arnold Milstein
  • David Scheinker
  • Ishan Paranjpe
  • Alexander T. Sandhu

Schulman's work covers several subfields such as economics and econometrics, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, pharmacology, and epidemiology, demonstrating interdisciplinary approaches to healthcare research.

Main topics of their scholarly output include:

  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

Schulman has also published a book titled Developing Strategies to Improve Diabetes Management in College-Going Young Adults (2024), released by Frontiers Media.

Their research contributions have been recognized through membership in the Association of American Physicians, reflecting engagement with the medical and scientific community.

Best Publications

  • The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization

    Kevin A. Schulman;Jesse A. Berlin;William Harless;Jon F. Kerner

  • Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial.

    Christopher M. O'Connor;David J. Whellan;David J. Whellan;Kerry L. Lee;Steven J. Keteyian

  • Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation

    Eric L. Eisenstein;Kevin J. Anstrom;David F. Kong;Linda K. Shaw

  • BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.

    Caryn Lerman;Steven Narod;Kevin Schulman;Chanita Hughes

  • Covid-19 and Health Care's Digital Revolution.

    Sirina Keesara;Andrea Jonas;Kevin Schulman

  • Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research

    Seth William Glickman;John G. McHutchison;Eric D. Peterson;Charles B. Cairns;Charles B. Cairns

  • Effects of exercise training on health status in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial.

    Kathryn E. Flynn;Ileana L. Piña;David J. Whellan;David J. Whellan;Li Lin

  • A randomized controlled trial of epoprostenol therapy for severe congestive heart failure: The Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST)

    Robert M. Califf;Kirkwood F. Adams;William J. McKenna;Mihai Gheorghiade

  • Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries

    Richard Sullivan;Jeffrey Peppercorn;Karol Sikora;John Zalcberg

  • Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days.

    William Boulding;Seth W Glickman;Matthew P Manary;Kevin A Schulman

  • Relationship Between Cardiac Rehabilitation and Long-Term Risks of Death and Myocardial Infarction Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries

    Bradley G. Hammill;Lesley H. Curtis;Kevin A. Schulman;David J. Whellan

  • Randomized Trial of Warfarin, Aspirin, and Clopidogrel in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. The Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) Trial

    Barry M. Massie;Joseph F. Collins;Susan E. Ammon;Paul W. Armstrong

  • Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship With Clinical Quality and Inpatient Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Seth William Glickman;William Boulding;Matthew Manary;Richard Staelin

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly Prevalence and Outcomes

    Saif S. Rathore;Alan K. Berger;Kevin P. Weinfurt;Kevin A. Schulman

  • Cost of Cancer Care: Issues and Implications

    Neal J. Meropol;Kevin A. Schulman

  • Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.

    Seth W. Glickman;Fang Shu Ou;Elizabeth R. DeLong;Matthew T. Roe

  • Incidence and Prevalence of Heart Failure in Elderly Persons, 1994-2003

    Lesley H. Curtis;David J. Whellan;Bradley G. Hammill;Adrian F. Hernandez

  • The significance of skeletal-related events for the health-related quality of life of patients with metastatic prostate cancer

    Kevin P. Weinfurt;Y. Li;L. D. Castel;F. Saad

  • Changing Gender Prevalence of Stone Disease

    Charles D. Scales;Lesley H. Curtis;Regina D. Norris;W. Patrick Springhart

  • Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. Commentary

    Eric L. Eisenstein;Kevin J. Anstrom;David F. Kong;Linda K. Shaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Lesley H. Curtis
Lesley H. Curtis Duke University
David J. Whellan
David J. Whellan Thomas Jefferson University
Henry A. Glick
Henry A. Glick University of Pennsylvania
Kevin J. Anstrom
Kevin J. Anstrom Duke University
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
Neal J. Meropol
Neal J. Meropol Case Western Reserve University
Daniel Polsky
Daniel Polsky Johns Hopkins University
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University
Mark A. Hall
Mark A. Hall Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a medical career in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to explore. Many students begin with focused programs that lead directly to in-demand roles in healthcare, offering flexible study options and affordable tuition.

For example, students interested in health data and management can look into online mhi programs. These degrees prepare graduates to manage patient records and health information systems—skills essential for modern hospitals and clinics.

Those drawn to administrative and technology-focused healthcare roles should consider online medical billing and coding courses. These programs are designed for quick entry into the healthcare workforce and are often among the most affordable options.

If you already have a nursing background and seek career advancement, online nurse practitioner programs offer a convenient route toward higher earning potential and more patient responsibility. Beginners can also access professional nursing through the cheapest online msn programs, which offer affordable master's-level education.

These online pathways offer flexibility, competitive tuition, and access to rewarding healthcare careers, making them excellent alternatives or complements to a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin A. Schulman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles