World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9305 8698 4917 4479 80 17762

Keith E. Davis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith E. Davis between 1959 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith E. Davis published across 66 years, from 1959 to 2024, averaging 1.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2000. 2 of the 83 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2000. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 1 publication 1961: 1 publication 1962: 2 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 3 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 4 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1959 2024

83 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith E. Davis: publications per year, 1959 to 2024
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 1
1961 1
1962 2
1963 0
1964 0
1965 3
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 1
1970 1
1971 4
1972 2
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 3
1985 2
1986 3
1987 3
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 6
2001 1
2002 5
2003 3
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 5
2010 1
2011 1
2012 2
2013 1
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 83
Download as CSV

Keith E. Davis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith E. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 80
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith E. Davis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith E. Davis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Keith E. Davis is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences and health professions, focusing on issues related to intimate partner and family violence, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, and sexual assault and victimization studies.

Their publication record includes contributions to both main and subfields such as social sciences, health, general health professions, and gender studies. These areas reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research approach.

Keith E. Davis has published work in the following venues:

  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (1 publication)

One recent paper by Davis is titled "REPRINT OF: Physical and Mental Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence for Men and Women", published in 2021 in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ann L. Coker
  • Ileana Arias
  • Sujata Desai
  • Maureen Sanderson
  • Heather M. Brandt

The main topics of research covered in Davis's work are:

  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

In recognition of academic contributions, Davis was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1

    Edward E. Jones;Keith E. Davis

  • Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women.

    Ann L. Coker;Keith E. Davis;Ileana Arias;Sujata Desai

  • Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’close friendships and romantic relationships

    R. Chris Fraley;Keith E. Davis

  • Social Support Protects against the Negative Effects of Partner Violence on Mental Health

    Ann L. Coker;Paige H. Smith;Martie P. Thompson;Robert E. McKeown

  • Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: a longitudinal analysis.

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Keith E. Davis

  • The Social construction of the person

    Kenneth J. Gergen;Keith E. Davis

  • Lovestyles and Attachment Styles Compared: Their Relations to Each Other and to Various Relationship Characteristics:

    Marc B. Levy;Keith E. Davis

  • Severe Dating Violence and Quality of Life Among South Carolina High School Students

    Ann L Coker;Robert E McKeown;Maureen Sanderson;Keith E Davis

  • Dismissing-avoidance and the defensive organization of emotion, cognition, and behavior.

    R. Chris Fraley;Keith E. Davis;Phillip R. Shaver

  • Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception.

    Edward E. Jones;Keith E. Davis;Kenneth J. Gergen

  • Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic Internet use: Evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of Internet activities

    Ho-Kyung Kim;Keith E. Davis

  • Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection.

    Unknown

  • Stalking perpetrators and psychological maltreatment of partners: anger-jealousy, attachment insecurity, need for control, and break-up context.

    Keith E. Davis;April Ace;Michelle Andra

  • Physical and mental health effects of being stalked for men and women.

    Keith E. Davis;Ann L. Coker;Maureen Sanderson

  • Prospective study of cardiorespiratory fitness and depressive symptoms in women and men

    Xuemei Sui;James N. Laditka;Timiothy S. Church;James W. Hardin

  • The Dynamics of Sexual Behavior of College Students.

    Gilbert R. Kaats;Keith E. Davis

  • Some determinants of reactions to being approved or disapproved as a person.

    Edward E. Jones;Kenneth J. Gergen;Keith E. Davis

  • Friendship and love relationships.

    Keith E. Davis;Michael J. Todd

  • Love Styles and Relationship Quality: A Contribution to Validation

    Keith E. Davis;Holly Latty-Mann

  • Assessing friendship: Prototypes, paradigm cases and relationship description.

    Keith E. Davis;Michael J. Todd

  • Stalking and psychological abuse: common factors and relationship-specific characteristics.

    Melanie Livet Dye;Keith E Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann L. Coker
Ann L. Coker University of Kentucky
Steven N. Blair
Steven N. Blair University of South Carolina
Kirby L. Jackson
Kirby L. Jackson University of South Carolina
Irene Hanson Frieze
Irene Hanson Frieze University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth J. Gergen
Kenneth J. Gergen Swarthmore College
R. Chris Fraley
R. Chris Fraley University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ileana Arias
Ileana Arias Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Martie P. Thompson
Martie P. Thompson Appalachian State University
Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring a degree in Psychology, it's important to consider the many available online degrees and flexible career pathways in the USA. A popular route is becoming a counselor, as demand continues to rise for qualified professionals in mental health and human services. Many states now offer streamlined educational options that allow students to pursue their passion quickly while studying online or through hybrid programs.

For example, those interested in working in Mississippi can discover the fastest way to become a counselor in Mississippi. Similarly, prospective students can explore the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Missouri, or review options for the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Montana. Those aiming to launch their careers in Nebraska can research the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Nebraska.

It's crucial to check your state's specific licensure requirements for counselors and related fields. Online psychology degrees provide valuable flexibility, letting you balance academics with work or family commitments while advancing toward your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Keith E. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles