World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
8759
World Ranking
8747
National Ranking
4654

Glenn D. Reeder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn D. Reeder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Glenn D. Reeder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn D. Reeder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glenn D. Reeder is affiliated with Illinois State University in the United States. The professional record indicates a focus on academic research without specific details on publication titles, research topics, or main areas of study documented.

There are no listed recent papers or publications available for reference, and there is no information on frequent co-authors or common publication venues associated with this researcher.

Additionally, no book publications or awards have been recorded for Glenn D. Reeder. The absence of data about fields, subfields, or research topics further limits insight into their specific research interests or academic focus.

As of the available information, Glenn D. Reeder is not deceased, which implies ongoing affiliation and potential activity within their academic position at Illinois State University.

Best Publications

  • A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.

    Glenn D. Reeder;Marilynn B. Brewer

  • Stigma: Advances in Theory and Research

    Arjan E. R. Bos;John B. Pryor;Glenn D. Reeder;Sarah E. Stutterheim

  • Narcissism and Comparative Self-Enhancement Strategies ☆

    W.Keith Campbell;Glenn D. Reeder;Constantine Sedikides;Andrew J. Elliot

  • Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure.

    Garth J. O. Fletcher;Paula Danilovics;Guadalupe Fernandez;Dena Peterson

  • The self-serving bias in relational context.

    Constantine Sedikides;W. Keith Campbell;Glenn D. Reeder;Andrew J. Elliot

  • A dual-process model of reactions to perceived stigma.

    John B. Pryor;Glenn D. Reeder;Christopher Yeadon;Matthew Hesson-McInnis

  • The infection of bad company: stigma by association.

    John B. Pryor;Glenn D. Reeder;Andrew E. Monroe

  • The Relationship Closeness Induction Task.

    Constantine Sedikides;W. Keith Campbell;Glenn D. Reeder;Andrew J. Elliot

  • The attribution of morality.

    Glenn D. Reeder;John M. Spores

  • Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: the role of perceived motive.

    Glenn D. Reeder;Shamala Kumar;Matthew S. Hesson-McInnis;David Trafimow

  • Revising an Impression of Morality

    Glenn D. Reeder;Michael D. Coovert

  • Dispositional attribution: multiple inferences about motive-related traits.

    Glenn D. Reeder;Roos Vonk;Marla J. Ronk;Jaap Ham

  • The Instrumental and Symbolic Functions of Attitudes toward Persons with AIDS1

    John B. Pryor;Glenn D. Reeder;Richard Vinacco;Teri L. Kott

  • Mindreading: Judgments About Intentionality and Motives in Dispositional Inference

    Glenn D. Reeder

  • When Do We Ostracize

    Eric D. Wesselmann;James H. Wirth;John B. Pryor;Glenn D. Reeder

  • A Social-Psychological Analysis of HIV-Related Stigma: A Two-Factor Theory

    John B. Pryor;Glenn D. Reeder;Steven Landau

  • Trait-Behavior Relations and Dispositional Inference

    Glenn D. Reeder

  • Do others bring out the worst in narcissists? The "Others Exist for Me" illusion

    C. Sedikides;W.K. Campbell;G.D. Reeder;A.J. Elliot

  • Among friends? An examination of friendship and the self-serving bias.

    W. Keith Campbell;Constantine Sedikides;Glenn D. Reeder;Andrew J. Elliot

  • On Attributing Negative Motives to Others Who Disagree With Our Opinions

    Glenn D. Reeder;John B. Pryor;Michael J. A. Wohl;Michael L. Griswell

Frequent Co-Authors

John B. Pryor
John B. Pryor Illinois State University
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
W. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell University of Georgia
Eric D. Wesselmann
Eric D. Wesselmann Illinois State University
Kipling D. Williams
Kipling D. Williams Purdue University West Lafayette
David M. Messick
David M. Messick Northwestern University
David Trafimow
David Trafimow New Mexico State University
Garth J. O. Fletcher
Garth J. O. Fletcher Victoria University of Wellington
Arjan E. R. Bos
Arjan E. R. Bos The Open University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens diverse opportunities, ranging from counseling to research-driven roles. Many students are increasingly interested in online degrees, which offer flexibility and access to specialized programs tailored to today’s job market.

One popular pathway is substance abuse counseling. With the growing need for mental health support, substance abuse counselors are in high demand across the country. The process to become a counselor can vary greatly by location. For example, there are specific requirements for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Anaheim compared to how to become a substance abuse counselor in Anchorage, reflecting local licensing criteria and training needs.

For students near the East Coast, learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Arlington or how to become a substance abuse counselor in Atlanta can unlock unique career opportunities. Exploring these localized requirements is crucial for anyone considering an online degree with a focus on counseling or mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn D. Reeder

Recently Published Articles