World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 28 1367 1244 18 18 245 4134

Karen Celis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karen Celis between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karen Celis published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2013. 7 of the 257 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2013. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 15 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 1 publication
1970 2025

257 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karen Celis: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 3
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 10
2002 3
2003 1
2004 15
2005 4
2006 4
2007 11
2008 12
2009 11
2010 12
2011 19
2012 14
2013 30
2014 22
2015 13
2016 12
2017 6
2018 9
2019 9
2020 16
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 6
2025 1
Total 257
Download as CSV

Karen Celis publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Celis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–245 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 245 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13 245
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Karen Celis D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Celis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 28 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 28 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99 28
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Karen Celis is affiliated with the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium and focuses their academic research primarily in the social sciences. Their work spans several interconnected subfields, including political science and international relations, gender studies, sociology and political science, social psychology, and history.

Their research covers a range of topics, with emphasis on gender politics and representation, electoral systems and political participation, social policy and reform studies, historical gender and feminism studies, migration, refugees, and integration, political systems and governance, as well as gender, feminism, and media.

The scientist has contributed publications to various academic venues, frequently appearing in the European Journal of Politics and Gender. Other notable publication venues include Acta Politica, Genero časopis za feminističku teoriju i studije kulture, Politics and Governance, and Politics of the Low Countries.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Karen Celis include:

  • From women's presence to feminist representation: second-generation design for women's group representation (2023), European Journal of Politics and Gender
  • Women's Good Political Representation (2023), Genero časopis za feminističku teoriju i studije kulture
  • Resentment and Coping With the Democratic Dilemma (2021), Politics and Governance
  • Intersectional candidate nomination: how district and party factors shape the inclusion of ethnic minority men and women in Brussels (2020), Acta Politica

The scholar has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Virginie Van Ingelgom, Sarah Childs, Louise Knops, Soetkin Verhaegen, and Kenza Amara-Hammou.

Best Publications

  • RETHINKING WOMEN'S SUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION

    Karen Celis;Sarah Childs;Johanna Kantola;Mona Lena Krook

  • The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?

    Karen Celis;Sarah Childs

  • Introduction: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women: New Directions

    Karen Celis;Sarah Childs

  • Substantive representation of women: the representation of women's interests and the impact of descriptive representation in the Belgian parliament (1900-1979)

    Karen Celis

  • Constituting women's interests through representative claims

    Karen Celis;Sarah Childs;Johanna Kantola;Mona Lena Krook

  • Quotas and intersectionality: Ethnicity and gender in candidate selection:

    Karen Celis;Silvia Erzeel;Liza Mügge;Alyt Damstra

  • Sowing the Seeds of Its Own Failure: Implementing the Concept of Gender Mainstreaming

    Petra Meier;Karen Celis

  • Substantive Representation of Women (and Improving it): What it is and should be About?

    Karen Celis

  • The Rise of Gender Quota Laws: Expanding the Spectrum of Determinants for Electoral Reform

    Karen Celis;Mona Lena Krook;Petra Meier

  • Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non-Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women

    Karen Celis;Silvia Erzeel

  • Politics, gender, and concepts : theory and methodology

    Gary Goertz;Amy G. Mazur

  • STUDYING WOMEN'S SUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION IN LEGISLATURES: WHEN REPRESENTATIVE ACTS, CONTEXTS AND WOMEN'S INTERESTS BECOME IMPORTANT

    Karen Celis

  • Feminist Democratic Representation

    Karen Celis;Sarah Childs

  • Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation

    Sarah L Childs;Karen Celis

  • Introduction: Gender and Politics: A Gendered World, a Gendered Discipline

    Karen Celis;Johanna Kantola;Georgina Waylen;S. Laurel Weldon

  • Political parties, ideology and the substantive representation of women

    Silvia Erzeel;Karen Celis

  • The Complementarity Advantage: Parties, Representativeness and Newcomers’ Access to Power

    Karen Celis;Silvia Erzeel

  • Power struggles: gender equality in political representation.

    Karen Celis;Joni Lovenduski

  • Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation:

    Eline Severs;Karen Celis;Silvia Erzeel

  • Conservatism and Women's Political Representation

    Karen Celis;Sarah Childs

  • On Substantive Representation, Diversity, and Responsiveness

    Karen Celis

  • Whose equality? Measuring group representation:

    Karen Celis;Liza M Mügge

  • Representativity in times of diversity: The political representation of women

    Karen Celis

  • Pinning the Butterfly: Women, Blue-Collar and Ethnic Minority MPs vis-à-vis Parliamentary Norms and the Parliamentary Role of the Group Representative

    Karen Celis;Bram Wauters

  • The rise of gender quotas laws : expanding the spectrum of determinants for electoral reform

    Karen Celis;Mona Lena Krook;Petra Meier

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah Childs
Sarah Childs University of Edinburgh
Bram Wauters
Bram Wauters Ghent University
Johanna Kantola
Johanna Kantola University of Helsinki
Mona Lena Krook
Mona Lena Krook Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Liza Mügge
Liza Mügge University of Amsterdam
Georgina Waylen
Georgina Waylen University of Manchester
Stefaan Walgrave
Stefaan Walgrave University of Antwerp
Sofie Marien
Sofie Marien KU Leuven
S. Laurel Weldon
S. Laurel Weldon Simon Fraser University
Mark A. Pollack
Mark A. Pollack Temple University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science in the USA opens doors to several related online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many students seeking flexibility and speed consider quick masters degrees online, allowing them to fast-track their education while balancing work or other commitments.

Affordability is another key factor when choosing a program. Those looking to minimize student debt often research the cheapest online school options, ensuring quality education at a lower cost.

Political Science graduates frequently work in government, policy analysis, or nonprofit sectors. Some find overlapping roles with those who hold degrees in other areas, such as environmental policy. Exploring jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree salary us can reveal unique interdisciplinary career opportunities.

Those interested in analytical or quantitative careers may want to consider a bachelor of mathematics online. This pathway can complement political science expertise, especially for roles involving data analysis or research.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Celis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles