World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
47
Citations
7488
World Ranking
18741
National Ranking
551

Dieter M. Bulach publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter M. Bulach sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Dieter M. Bulach D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter M. Bulach sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter M. Bulach is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, medicine, and agricultural and biological sciences.

Within these broad disciplines, their work highlights expertise in various subfields including food science, infectious diseases, molecular biology, ecology, and endocrinology. Their research topics concentrate on epidemiology and microbiology, covering areas such as:

  • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
  • Listeria monocytogenes in food safety
  • Microbial community ecology and physiology
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Algal biology and biofuel production

Recent publications by Dieter M. Bulach document contributions to several scientific journals and include:

  • "A Prospective, Open-Label Pilot Study of Concurrent Male Partner Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis" (2021) in mBio
  • "Development of a free radical scavenging bacterial consortium to mitigate oxidative stress in cnidarians" (2021) in Microbial Biotechnology
  • "Molecular characterization of Campylobacter spp. recovered from beef, chicken, lamb and pork products at retail in Australia" (2020) in PLoS ONE
  • "Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. Causing Human Infection in Australia: An International Comparison" (2020) in Microbial Drug Resistance
  • "Risk factors for campylobacteriosis in Australia: outcomes of a 2018-2019 case-control study" (2022) in BMC Infectious Diseases

Throughout their career, Dieter M. Bulach has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Rhiannon L. Wallace
  • Mary Valcanis
  • Martyn Kirk
  • Kathryn Glass
  • Angus McLure

The scientist's publications have appeared regularly in specific venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Gut Pathogens
  • Microbiology Resource Announcements
  • Microbiology Spectrum
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Best Publications

  • Genome reduction in Leptospira borgpetersenii reflects limited transmission potential

    Dieter Mark Bulach;Richard L Zuerner;Peter Wilson;Torsten Seemann

  • Genome Sequence of the Saprophyte Leptospira biflexa Provides Insights into the Evolution of Leptospira and the Pathogenesis of Leptospirosis

    Mathieu Picardeau;Dieter Mark Bulach;Dieter Mark Bulach;Christiane Bouchier;Richard L Zuerner

  • What Makes a Bacterial Species Pathogenic?:Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Genus Leptospira.

    Derrick E. Fouts;Michael A. Matthias;Haritha Adhikarla;Ben Adler

  • Global Analysis of Outer Membrane Proteins from Leptospira interrogans Serovar Lai

    Paul A. Cullen;Stuart J. Cordwell;Dieter M. Bulach;David A. Haake;David A. Haake

  • Prospective Whole-Genome Sequencing Enhances National Surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes

    Jason C. Kwong;Karolina Mercoulia;Takehiro Tomita;Marion Easton

  • Leptospira fainei sp. nov., isolated from pigs in Australia.

    Phillipe Perolat;Rod J Chappel;Ben Adler;Guy Baranton

  • Establishment, immortalisation and characterisation of pteropid bat cell lines.

    Gary Crameri;Gary Crameri;Shawn Todd;Samantha Grimley;Samantha Grimley;Jennifer A. McEachern;Jennifer A. McEachern

  • A Methylated Phosphate Group and Four Amide-linked Acyl Chains in Leptospira interrogans Lipid A THE MEMBRANE ANCHOR OF AN UNUSUAL LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE THAT ACTIVATES TLR2

    Nanette L S Que-Gewirth;Anthony A Ribeiro;Anthony A Ribeiro;Suzanne R Kalb;Robert J Cotter

  • LipL21 Is a Novel Surface-Exposed Lipoprotein of Pathogenic Leptospira Species

    Paul A. Cullen;David A. Haake;David A. Haake;Dieter M. Bulach;Richard L. Zuerner

  • Group II Nucleopolyhedrovirus Subgroups Revealed by Phylogenetic Analysis of Polyhedrin and DNA Polymerase Gene Sequences

    D. M. Bulach;C. A. Kumar;A. Zaia;Bufeng Liang

  • Comparative Analysis of the First Complete Enterococcus faecium Genome

    Margaret Mc Lam;Torsten Seemann;Dieter Mark Bulach;Simon Leigh Gladman

  • Response of Leptospira interrogans to Physiologic Osmolarity: Relevance in Signaling the Environment-to-Host Transition

    James Matsunaga;James Matsunaga;Miranda Lo;Dieter Mark Bulach;Richard L Zuerner

  • Effects of temperature on gene expression patterns in Leptospira interrogans serovar lai as assessed by whole-genome microarrays

    Miranda Lo;Dieter Mark Bulach;David Richard Powell;David A Haake;David A Haake

  • Genome-Wide Transposon Mutagenesis in Pathogenic Leptospira Species

    Gerald Laurence Murray;Viviane Morel;Gustavo M Cerqueira;Gustavo M Cerqueira;Julio Croda;Julio Croda

  • A Comparison of Three Bioinformatics Pipelines for the Analysis ofPreterm Gut Microbiota using 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Data

    Erica Plummer;Jimmy Twin;Dieter M. Bulach;Suzanne M. Garl

  • Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains negative for locus of enterocyte effacement.

    Hayley J Newton;Joan Sloan;Dieter Mark Bulach;Torsten Seemann

  • Conservation of the S10-spc-α Locus within Otherwise Highly Plastic Genomes Provides Phylogenetic Insight into the Genus Leptospira

    Berta Victoria;Ahmed Ahmed;Richard L. Zuerner;Niyaz Ahmed

  • Functional Identification of Conjugation and Replication Regions of the Tetracycline Resistance Plasmid pCW3 from Clostridium perfringens

    Trudi Leanne Bannam;Wee Lin Teng;Dieter Mark Bulach;Dena Lyras

  • Genetic organization of the she pathogenicity island in Shigella flexneri 2a.

    Keith Al-Hasani;Kumar Rajakumar;Kumar Rajakumar;Dieter M Bulach;Roy M Robins-Browne;Roy M Robins-Browne

  • Candidate vaccine antigens and genes in Pasteurella multocida

    Ben Adler;Dieter M Bulach;Jing Y Chung;Stephen Doughty

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Adler
Ben Adler Monash University
Torsten Seemann
Torsten Seemann University of Melbourne
Julian I. Rood
Julian I. Rood Monash University
Timothy P. Stinear
Timothy P. Stinear University of Melbourne
Suzanne M. Garland
Suzanne M. Garland University of Melbourne
David A. Haake
David A. Haake University of California, Los Angeles
Richard L. Zuerner
Richard L. Zuerner United States Department of Agriculture
David B. Boyle
David B. Boyle Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness
Benjamin P. Howden
Benjamin P. Howden University of Melbourne
Dena Lyras
Dena Lyras Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Biology and Biochemistry students in the USA can pursue a variety of in-demand and flexible career paths through online degree programs. The healthcare industry continues to expand, creating new roles driven by technology, regulations, and patient care needs.

For those interested in medical administration, it's valuable to explore whether is medical billing and coding in demand. This field offers steady job opportunities as healthcare systems rely on skilled professionals for accurate billing and records.

Earning an online health information management degree can launch careers in data management and patient information security—vital areas for hospitals and research organizations.

Prospective nutritionists and health advisors can gain advanced expertise with an online nutrition masters. This degree opens doors to private practice, community outreach, and roles in wellness programs.

Finally, those seeking hands-on diagnostic roles should consider training from an online ultrasound tech school. These programs provide the skills needed for a rewarding, patient-focused career with strong job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Dieter M. Bulach

Trending Scientists