World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
39
Citations
5349
World Ranking
4194
National Ranking
272

K. W. Jaggard publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. W. Jaggard sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 86 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

K. W. Jaggard D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. W. Jaggard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Extraction of vegetation biophysical parameters by inversion of the PROSPECT + SAIL models on sugar beet canopy reflectance data. Application to TM and AVIRIS sensors

    S. Jacquemoud;F. Baret;B. Andrieu;F.M. Danson

  • Possible changes to arable crop yields by 2050

    Keith W. Jaggard;Aiming Qi;Eric S. Ober

  • Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet

    Eric S. Ober;Mich Le Bloa;Chris J.A. Clark;Andy Royal

  • Climatic impact on the productivity of sugar beet in Europe, 1961–1995

    J.D Pidgeon;A.R. Werker;K.W. Jaggard;G.M. Richter

  • Estimation of sugar beet productivity from reflection in the red and infrared spectral bands

    Unknown

  • ASSESSING THE GENETIC RESOURCES TO IMPROVE DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN SUGAR BEET: AGRONOMIC TRAITS OF DIVERSE GENOTYPES UNDER DROUGHTED AND IRRIGATED CONDITIONS

    Eric S. Ober;Chris J.A. Clark;Mich Le Bloa;Andy Royal

  • Nitrogen fertilizer and the efficiency of the sugar beet crop in late summer

    C.S. Malnou;K.W. Jaggard;D.L. Sparkes

  • Crop physiology and agronomy

    Unknown

  • Using multi-environment sugar beet variety trials to screen for drought tolerance

    John D. Pidgeon;Eric S. Ober;Aiming Qi;Chris J.A. Clark

  • Foliage cover and radiation interception

    Unknown

  • An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. IV. The expansion of the leaf canopy in relation to temperature and nitrogen

    G. F. J. Milford;T. O. Pocock;K. W. Jaggard;P. V. Biscoe

  • A canopy approach to nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for the sugar beet crop

    C.S. Malnou;K.W. Jaggard;D.L. Sparkes

  • The relative effects of drought stress and virus yellows on the yield of sugarbeet in the UK, 1980-95.

    K. W. Jaggard;A. M. Dewar;J. D. Pidgeon

  • Environmental impact and economic assessment for UK sugar beet production systems

    J. Tzilivakis;K. W. Jaggard;K. A. Lewis;M. J. May

  • The impact of climate change on sugarbeet yield in the UK: 1976-2004

    K. W. Jaggard;Aiming Qi;M. A. Semenov

  • Ground cover and leaf area index of maize and sugar beet crops

    B. Andrieu;J.M. Allirand;K. Jaggard

  • Modelling radiation interception and radiation use efficiency for sugar beet under variable climatic stress

    Goetz M. Richter;Keith W. Jaggard;Rowan A.C. Mitchell

  • The effect of field margins on the yield of sugar beet and cereal crops

    D L Sparkes;K W Jaggard;S J Ramsden;R K Scott

  • The effects of drought on sugar beet growth in isolation and in combination with beet yellows virus infection

    G. R. G. Clover;H. G. Smith;S. N. Azam-Ali;K. W. Jaggard

  • Dependence of sugar beet yield on light interception and evapotranspiration

    Unknown

  • Effects of sowing date on plant establishment and bolting and the influence of these factors on yields of sugar beet

    K. W. Jaggard;R. Wickens;D. J. Webb;R. K. Scott

  • Integration of nitrate cover crops into sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) rotations. I. Management and effectiveness of nitrate cover crops

    M. F. Allison;M. J. Armstrong;K. W. Jaggard;A. D. Todd

  • An analysis of the agronomic, economic and environmental effects of applying N fertilizer to sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris )

    M. F. Allison;M. J. Armstrong;K. W. Jaggard;A. D. Todd

  • Impact of weather, agronomy and breeding on yields of sugarbeet grown in the UK since 1970.

    R. K. Scott;K. W. Jaggard

  • Changes in the weight and quality of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris ) roots in storage clamps on farms

    K. W. Jaggard;C. J. A. Clark;M. J. May;S. McCULLAGH

  • The use of radiation interception and transpiration to predict the yield of healthy, droughted and virus-infected sugar beet.

    G. R. G. Clover;K. W. Jaggard;H. G. Smith;S. N. Azam-Ali

  • Effects of soil density on yield and fertilizer requirement of sugar beet

    K. W. Jaggard

  • A census of seedling establishment in sugar-beet crops

    M. J. Durrant;R. A. Dunning;K. W. Jaggard;R. B. Bugg

  • Effects of seed advancement and sowing date on establishment, bolting and yield of sugarbeet.

    M. J. Durrant;S. J. Mash;K. W. Jaggard

  • Integration of nitrate cover crops into sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) rotations. II. Effect of cover crops on growth, yield and N requirement of sugarbeet

    M. F. Allison;M. J. Armstrong;K. W. Jaggard;A. D. Todd

  • Sugar-beet seed advancement to increase establishment and decrease bolting

    M. J. Durrant;K. W. Jaggard

  • Crop growth and weather: can yield forecasts be reliable?

    R. K. Scott;K. W. Jaggard

  • Setting up and Managing an Experimental Farm for Crop Studies: the First 20 Years' Experience at Broom's Barn

    D. A. Cooke;K. W. Jaggard;A. P. Draycott;R. K. Scott

  • The case for headland set‐aside: consideration of whole‐farm gross margins and grain production on two farms with contrasting rotations

    D L Sparkes;S J Ramsden;K W Jaggard;R K Scott

Frequent Co-Authors

Debbie L. Sparkes
Debbie L. Sparkes University of Nottingham
Mikhail A. Semenov
Mikhail A. Semenov Rothamsted Research
Fang-Jie Zhao
Fang-Jie Zhao Nanjing Agricultural University
Aiming Qi
Aiming Qi University of Hertfordshire
Rowan A. C. Mitchell
Rowan A. C. Mitchell Rothamsted Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing K. W. Jaggard