World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
67
Citations
28149
World Ranking
2145
National Ranking
1078

Juris Hartmanis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juris Hartmanis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 422 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Juris Hartmanis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juris Hartmanis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society
  • 2013 - ACM Distinguished Service Award For their long-standing work as series editors of the Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) -- under their stewardship a most important venue for disseminating innovative research in the initial decades of the field of computer science.
  • 1994 - ACM Fellow In recognition of their seminal paper which established the foundations for the field of computational complexity theory.
  • 1993 - A. M. Turing Award With Richard E. Stearns, in recognition of their seminal paper which established the foundations for the field of computational complexity theory.
  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1989 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For fundamental contributions to computational complexity theory and to research and education in computing.
  • 1981 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Juris Hartmanis is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their career has been primarily rooted in the field of computer science, with a focus on foundational aspects of computational complexity theory.

Hartmanis has received multiple awards recognizing contributions to computational complexity and related research areas. In 1993, they were honored with the A. M. Turing Award jointly with Richard E. Stearns for their seminal paper that established the foundations for computational complexity theory.

Additional honors include being named an ACM Fellow in 1994 specifically for their foundational paper. Hartmanis also received the ACM Distinguished Service Award in 2013 for their long-standing work as a series editor of the Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), an important venue for disseminating computer science research in its early decades.

Memberships and fellowships further reflect recognition by the scientific community. Hartmanis became a member of the National Academy of Sciences and a Fellow of the American Mathematical Society in 2013.

Earlier distinctions include election as a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1992, and selection as a member of the National Academy of Engineering in 1989 for contributions to computational complexity theory as well as research and education in computing.

They were also made a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1981.

Best Publications

  • The Semantic Web

    Unknown

  • Fast Software Encryption

    Gerhard Goos;Juris Hartmanis;Jan van Leeuwen;Bruce Schneier

  • Partial-Order Methods for the Verification of Concurrent Systems: An Approach to the State-Explosion Problem

    Patrice Godefroid;J. van Leeuwen;J. Hartmanis;G. Goos

  • On the computational complexity of algorithms

    J. Hartmanis;R. E. Stearns

  • The Programming Language Ada Reference Manual American National Standards Institute, Inc. ANSI/MIL-STD-1815A-1983

    G. Goos;J. Hartmanis;D. Barstow;W. Brauer

  • Algebraic Structure Theory of Sequential Machines

    Juris Hartmanis;R. E. Stearns

  • On Isomorphisms and Density of $NP$ and Other Complete Sets

    Leonard Berman;Juris Hartmanis

  • Hierarchies of memory limited computations

    R. E. Stearns;J. Hartmanis;P. M. Lewis

  • Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2004

    Antonio Laganá;Marina L. Gavrilova;Vipin Kumar;Youngsong Mun

  • Temporal Databases: Research and Practice

    G. Goos;J. Hartmanis;Sury Sripada;J. Van Leeuwen

  • Memory bounds for recognition of context-free and context-sensitive languages

    P. M. Lewis;R. E. Stearns;J. Hartmanis

  • The Boolean hierarchy I: structural properties

    Jin-Yi Cai;Thomas Gundermann;Juris Hartmanis;Lane A. Hemachandra

  • Multiple Classifier Systems

    Unknown

  • Ambient Intelligence

    Unknown

  • Computer Science Today: Recent Trends and Developments

    Jan Van Leeuwen;J. Hartmanis;G. Goos

  • On the State Assignment Problem for Sequential Machines II

    R. E. Stearns;J. Hartmanis

  • Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II

    Unknown

  • Generalized Kolmogorov complexity and the structure of feasible computations

    Juris Hartmanis

  • Sparse sets in NP-P: EXPTIME versus NEXPTIME*

    Juris Hartmanis;Neil Immerman;Vivian Sewelson

  • Pose estimation errors, the ultimate diagnosis

    Carolina Redondo-Cabrera;Roberto Lopez-Sastre;Yu Xiang;Tinne Tuytelaars

  • An Overview of the Theory of Computational Complexity

    J. Hartmanis;J. E. Hopcroft

  • Computational Science and Its Applications — ICCSA 2003

    Vipin Kumar;Marina L. Gavrilova;Chih Jeng Kenneth Tan;Pierre L’Ecuyer

  • Multiple Classifier Systems

    Gerhard Goos;Juris Hartmanis;Jan van Leeuwen

  • On isomorphisms and density of NP and other complete sets

    J. Hartmanis;L. Berman

  • Distributed Artificial Intelligence

    G. Goos;J. Hartmanis;J. van Leeuwen

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Edwin Stearns
Richard Edwin Stearns University at Albany, State University of New York
Neil Immerman
Neil Immerman University of Massachusetts Amherst
John E. Hopcroft
John E. Hopcroft Cornell University
Jin-Yi Cai
Jin-Yi Cai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Oded Goldreich
Oded Goldreich Weizmann Institute of Science
Manuel Blum
Manuel Blum Carnegie Mellon University
Andrew Chi-Chih Yao
Andrew Chi-Chih Yao Tsinghua University
Benny Chor
Benny Chor Tel Aviv University
Johan Håstad
Johan Håstad Royal Institute of Technology
John R. Rice
John R. Rice Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and career paths. Many learners choose flexible and affordable options designed for busy professionals and students seeking career growth. For those wanting to build business and technical leadership skills within a short timeframe, a 1 year executive mba online can be an excellent choice.

If you have an interest in data, archives, or information management, an online library science degree can complement your computer science background and lead to unique interdisciplinary careers.

Cost is often a key concern when considering graduate education. Many students compare programs to find the least expensive online masters that fit their goals, ensuring a wise investment in their future.

For those aspiring to top leadership roles within tech-driven organizations, pursuing an online doctorate in organizational leadership can provide a valuable edge while offering the flexibility of distance learning.

Best Scientists Citing Juris Hartmanis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles