World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jürgen K. Naggert

Jürgen K. Naggert

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
10408
World Ranking
15102
National Ranking
468

Jürgen K. Naggert publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen K. Naggert sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 159 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jürgen K. Naggert D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen K. Naggert sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jürgen K. Naggert is affiliated with the University of Salerno in Italy and focuses their research on molecular biology and ophthalmology, with additional work spanning cell biology, physiology, and neurology. Their publications reflect a strong emphasis on retinal development, retinal diseases, and treatments, prominently featuring studies related to retinal degeneration and related cellular processes.

The scientist's research covers diverse main fields, including biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work often intersects subfields such as molecular biology, ophthalmology, and cell biology, contributing to the understanding of various physiological and neurological aspects related to vision and eye health.

Naggert's main research topics include retinal development and disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, investigations of retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes, endoplasmic reticulum stress and disease, lysosomal storage disorder research, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and mechanisms behind neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.

Key recent publications by Naggert consist of:

  • Mouse Models of Inherited Retinal Degeneration with Photoreceptor Cell Loss, 2020, Cells
  • Disruption in murine Eml1 perturbs retinal lamination during early development, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Identification of Arhgef12 and Prkci as genetic modifiers of retinal dysplasia in the Crb1rd8 mouse model, 2022, PLoS Genetics
  • Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Molecular Features of Heterogeneity in the Murine Retinal Pigment Epithelium, 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • A Splicing Mutation in Slc4a5 Results in Retinal Detachment and Retinal Pigment Epithelium Dysfunction, 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Preprints.org, Cells, and Scientific Reports.

Frequent co-authors include Patsy M. Nishina, Gayle B. Collin, Mark P. Krebs, Lisa Stone, and Lillian F. Hyde, reflecting collaboration with researchers involved in retinal biology and related genetic studies.

Best Publications

  • Hyperproinsulinaemia in obese fat/fat mice associated with a carboxypeptidase E mutation which reduces enzyme activity

    Jürgen K. Naggert;Lloyd D. Fricker;Oleg Varlamov;Patsy M. Nishina

  • Mutations in ALMS1 cause obesity, type 2 diabetes and neurosensory degeneration in Alström syndrome

    Gayle B Collin;Jan D Marshall;Akihiro Ikeda;W Venus So

  • CRB1 is essential for external limiting membrane integrity and photoreceptor morphogenesis in the mammalian retina

    Adrienne K. Mehalow;Shuhei Kameya;Richard S. Smith;Norman L. Hawes

  • New Alström syndrome phenotypes based on the evaluation of 182 cases.

    Jan D. Marshall;Roderick T. Bronson;Gayle B. Collin;Anne D. Nordstrom

  • Alström syndrome: genetics and clinical overview.

    Jan D Marshall;Pietro Maffei;Gayle B Collin;Jürgen K Naggert

  • Excess cone cell proliferation due to lack of a functional NR2E3 causes retinal dysplasia and degeneration in rd7/rd7 mice.

    Neena B. Haider;Jürgen K. Naggert;Patsy M. Nishina

  • Alstr|[ouml]|m Syndrome

    Jan D Marshall;Sebastian Beck;Pietro Maffei;Jürgen K Naggert

  • Linkage of atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype to the low density lipoprotein receptor locus on the short arm of chromosome 19.

    Patsy M. Nishina;John P. Johnson;Jurgen K. Naggert;Ronald M. Krauss

  • Alms1-disrupted mice recapitulate human Alström syndrome

    G.B. Collin;E. Cyr;R. Bronson;J.D. Marshall

  • Molecular cloning and sequencing of cDNAs encoding the entire rat fatty acid synthase

    Christopher M. Amy;Andrzej Witkowski;Jurgen Naggert;Brenda Williams

  • Genetic analysis of a new mouse model for non-insulin-dependent diabetes.

    Jung Han Kim;Saunak Sen;Cindy S. Avery;Elizabeth Simpson

  • Multiple trait measurements in 43 inbred mouse strains capture the phenotypic diversity characteristic of human populations.

    Karen L. Svenson;Randy Von Smith;Phyllis A. Magnani;Heather R. Suetin

  • A comparison of cDNA, oligonucleotide, and Affymetrix GeneChip gene expression microarray platforms.

    Yong Woo;Jason Affourtit;Sandra Daigle;Agnes Viale

  • Spectrum of ALMS1 variants and evaluation of genotype‐phenotype correlations in Alström syndrome

    Jan D. Marshall;Elizabeth G. Hinman;Gayle B. Collin;Sebastian Beck

  • Mfrp, a gene encoding a frizzled related protein, is mutated in the mouse retinal degeneration 6

    Shuhei Kameya;Norman L. Hawes;Bo Chang;John R. Heckenlively

  • Aberrant actin cytoskeleton leads to accelerated proliferation of corneal epithelial cells in mice deficient for destrin (actin depolymerizing factor)

    Sakae Ikeda;Leslie A. Cunningham;Dawnalyn Boggess;Craig D. Hobson

  • Disruption of intraflagellar protein transport in photoreceptor cilia causes Leber congenital amaurosis in humans and mice.

    Karsten Boldt;Dorus A. Mans;Jungyeon Won;Jeroen van Reeuwijk

  • Retinal degeneration but not obesity is observed in null mutants of the tubby-like protein 1 gene

    Sakae Ikeda;Nima Shiva;Akihiro Ikeda;Richard S. Smith

  • The tubby-like proteins, a family with roles in neuronal development and function.

    Akihiro Ikeda;Patsy M. Nishina;Jürgen K. Naggert

  • Phenotypic characterization of polygenic type 2 diabetes in TALLYHO/JngJ mice.

    Jung Han Kim;Taryn P Stewart;Morvarid Soltani-Bejnood;Luan Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Patsy M. Nishina
Patsy M. Nishina Tufts University
Neal S. Peachey
Neal S. Peachey Cleveland Clinic
Richard S. Smith
Richard S. Smith Laurentian University
Bo Chang
Bo Chang University of California, Los Angeles
Roberto Vettor
Roberto Vettor University of Padua
Beverly Paigen
Beverly Paigen University of Pennsylvania
Roderick T. Bronson
Roderick T. Bronson Harvard University
Gary A. Churchill
Gary A. Churchill The Jackson Laboratory
Angela Favaro
Angela Favaro University of Padua
John R. Heckenlively
John R. Heckenlively University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to several healthcare and technology careers. Many students pursue roles in health information management, medical coding, and billing, which are increasingly available through remote or health information management online degree programs.

Choosing between certifications can be an important step. Understanding ccs vs cpc salary can help you decide which pathway aligns with your financial and career goals.

For those considering the medical coding field, it's natural to ask, how much does a medical coder make? Compensation varies by certification, location, and experience, but this field continues to offer stable job opportunities.

While some may wonder is medical coding a dying career, the ongoing shift to digital health records means skilled professionals remain in demand. With flexible online programs and diverse career choices, Biology and Biochemistry graduates can build rewarding futures in healthcare and information management.

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen K. Naggert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles