World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
35
Citations
5464
World Ranking
8956
National Ranking
2499

Joseph H. Saleh publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph H. Saleh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 181 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Joseph H. Saleh D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph H. Saleh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph H. Saleh was affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields within engineering and computer science, focusing significantly on safety and reliability aspects.

Saleh's work covered the main fields of study of Engineering (27 publications) and Computer Science (13 publications). Within these broad areas, specialized subfields included Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality; Control and Systems Engineering; Artificial Intelligence; Radiological and Ultrasound Technology; and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

The scientist contributed to several key research topics demonstrating a consistent interest in risk and safety domains, as shown with publications related to Occupational Health and Safety Research, Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques, Fault Detection and Control Systems, Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications, Fire Detection and Safety Systems, Fire Dynamics and Safety Research, and Traffic and Road Safety.

Frequent publication venues for Saleh's work included:

  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • IEEE Access
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Neural Computing and Applications
  • IEEE Transactions on Reliability

They collaborated frequently with other researchers such as Zhaoyi Xu, Yanjie Guo, Rachmat Subagia, and Rodrigo L. Rose.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Joseph H. Saleh included:

  • "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities" (2021, Reliability Engineering & System Safety)
  • "Accurate Remaining Useful Life Prediction With Uncertainty Quantification: A Deep Learning and Nonstationary Gaussian Process Approach" (2021, IEEE Transactions on Reliability)
  • "A physics-informed dynamic deep autoencoder for accurate state-of-health prediction of lithium-ion battery" (2022, Neural Computing and Applications)
  • "Accident investigation and lessons not learned: AcciMap analysis of successive tailings dam collapses in Brazil" (2023, Reliability Engineering & System Safety)
  • "Advances Toward the Next Generation Fire Detection: Deep LSTM Variational Autoencoder for Improved Sensitivity and Reliability" (2021, IEEE Access)

Best Publications

  • Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities

    Zhaoyi Xu;Joseph Homer Saleh

  • Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems

    Joseph H. Saleh;Gregory Mark;Nicole C. Jordan

  • Satellite and satellite subsystems reliability: Statistical data analysis and modeling

    Jean-Francois Castet;Joseph H. Saleh

  • Safety in the mining industry and the unfinished legacy of mining accidents: Safety levers and defense-in-depth for addressing mining hazards

    Joseph H. Saleh;Amy M. Cummings

  • Archetypes for organizational safety

    Karen Marais;Joseph H. Saleh;Nancy G. Leveson

  • Highlights from the literature on accident causation and system safety: Review of major ideas, recent contributions, and challenges

    Joseph H. Saleh;Karen B. Marais;Efstathios Bakolas;Raghvendra V. Cowlagi

  • Flexibility in system design and implications for aerospace systems.

    Joseph H Saleh;Daniel E Hastings;Dava J Newman

  • Highlights from the early (and pre-) history of reliability engineering

    Joseph H. Saleh;Karen B. Marais

  • Flexibility and the value of on-orbit servicing: New customer-centric perspective

    Joseph H. Saleh;Elisabeth S. Lamassoure;Daniel E. Hastings;Dava J. Newman

  • Technology Readiness Level, Schedule Risk, and Slippage in Spacecraft Design

    Gregory F. Dubos;Joseph H. Saleh;Robert Braun

  • Beyond reliability, multi-state failure analysis of satellite subsystems: A statistical approach

    Jean-Francois Castet;Joseph H. Saleh

  • Beyond its cost, the value of maintenance: An analytical framework for capturing its net present value☆

    Karen B. Marais;Joseph H. Saleh

  • Near-miss management systems and observability-in-depth: Handling safety incidents and accident precursors in light of safety principles

    Maria Grazia Gnoni;Joseph Homer Saleh

  • Satellite Reliability: Statistical Data Analysis and Modeling

    Jean-Francois Castet;Joseph H. Saleh

  • From learning from accidents to teaching about accident causation and prevention: Multidisciplinary education and safety literacy for all engineering students

    Joseph H. Saleh;Cynthia C. Pendley

  • Space Systems Flexibility Provided by On-Orbit Servicing: Part 1

    Joseph H. Saleh;Elisabeth Lamassoure;Daniel E. Hastings

  • Spacecraft Design Lifetime

    Joseph H. Saleh;Daniel E. Hastings;Dava J. Newman

  • Accident precursors, near misses, and warning signs: Critical review and formal definitions within the framework of Discrete Event Systems

    Joseph H. Saleh;Elizabeth A. Saltmarsh;Francesca M. Favarò;Loïc Brevault

  • Spacecraft Reliability and Multi-State Failures: A Statistical Approach

    Jean-François Castet;Joseph Homer Saleh

  • Statistical reliability analysis of satellites by mass category: Does spacecraft size matter?

    Gregory F. Dubos;Jean-Francois Castet;Joseph H. Saleh

  • Reliability: How much is it worth? Beyond its estimation or prediction, the (net) present value of reliability

    Joseph H. Saleh;Karen B. Marais

Frequent Co-Authors

Dimitri N. Mavris
Dimitri N. Mavris Georgia Institute of Technology
Robert D. Braun
Robert D. Braun University of Colorado Boulder
Vigor Yang
Vigor Yang Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in Engineering and Technology in the USA, it's worth exploring related online degrees and alternative career pathways. Many students combine their technical backgrounds with further study in fields like business, law, human resources, or communications to broaden their opportunities and skill sets.

For those who want to move into management roles in technology companies, an cheapest online mba no gmat aacsb can be a cost-effective way to gain essential business knowledge. If your interests align with technology and the law, accredited aba paralegal programs offer a legal foundation that is valuable in areas like intellectual property or compliance.

Engineering teams rely on effective people management. Pursuing a master degree in human resources is a strategic choice for those keen on specializing in recruitment, training, or tech-focused HR roles. Clear and persuasive communication is also essential—an online master's in communication enhances your ability to lead projects and convey complex ideas to diverse audiences.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph H. Saleh

Recently Published Articles