World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Josef Nösberger

Josef Nösberger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 52 1923 1768 39 37 164 9550

Josef Nösberger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Josef Nösberger between 1965 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Josef Nösberger published across 56 years, from 1965 to 2020, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2001. 1 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2001. 1965: 3 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 6 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 29 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1965 2020

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Josef Nösberger: publications per year, 1965 to 2020
Year Publications
1965 3
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 2
1981 0
1982 0
1983 3
1984 5
1985 7
1986 6
1987 4
1988 3
1989 3
1990 7
1991 1
1992 1
1993 6
1994 4
1995 0
1996 13
1997 12
1998 8
1999 7
2000 13
2001 29
2002 7
2003 5
2004 7
2005 2
2006 3
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
Total 163
Download as CSV

Josef Nösberger publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josef Nösberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–165 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 164 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159 164
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Josef Nösberger D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josef Nösberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110 52
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Enzyme
  • Ecology

His main research concerns Agronomy, Lolium perenne, Carbon dioxide, Trifolium repens and Botany. The concepts of his Agronomy study are interwoven with issues in Ecosystem and Soil fertility. His Lolium perenne study deals with the bigger picture of Poaceae.

He interconnects Perennial plant, Photosynthesis and Animal science in the investigation of issues within Carbon dioxide. His research integrates issues of Nitrogen fixation, Nitrogenase and Monoculture in his study of Trifolium repens. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Climate change, Crop yield and Field conditions.

His most cited work include:

  • Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO2 Concentrations (1144 citations)
  • Growth response of Trifolium repens L. and Lolium perenne L. as monocultures and bi‐species mixture to free air CO2 enrichment and management (219 citations)
  • Stimulation of Symbiotic N2 Fixation in Trifolium repens L. under Elevated Atmospheric pCO2 in a Grassland Ecosystem. (200 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Josef Nösberger mostly deals with Agronomy, Botany, Trifolium repens, Lolium perenne and Photosynthesis. The various areas that Josef Nösberger examines in his Agronomy study include Nutrient, Carbon dioxide and Ecosystem. The Inflorescence research he does as part of his general Botany study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Micropropagation, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.

His Trifolium repens research includes themes of Overwintering, Nitrogen fixation, Nitrogenase, Repens and Stolon. His study in Lolium perenne is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Monoculture, Nitrate, Nitrogen cycle and Human fertilization. His research investigates the connection with Photosynthesis and areas like Sucrose which intersect with concerns in Fructose.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (50.00%)
  • Botany (37.50%)
  • Trifolium repens (30.77%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2000-2020)?

  • Agronomy (50.00%)
  • Lolium perenne (28.85%)
  • Perennial plant (12.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Lolium perenne, Perennial plant, Carbon dioxide and Ecosystem. His Agronomy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Soil water and Nutrient. His Lolium perenne research includes elements of Dry matter, Leaf area index, Dry weight and Biomass partitioning, Shoot.

His work in Dry matter covers topics such as Field experiment which are related to areas like Human fertilization and Poaceae. His research in Carbon dioxide intersects with topics in Photosynthesis, Crop yield and Animal science. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Acclimatization, Botany, Photosynthetic capacity, Stomatal conductance and RuBisCO.

Between 2000 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO2 Concentrations (1144 citations)
  • Is stimulation of leaf photosynthesis by elevated carbon dioxide concentration maintained in the long term? A test with Lolium perenne grown for 10 years at two nitrogen fertilization levels under Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) (155 citations)
  • Ten years of free-air CO2 enrichment altered the mobilization of N from soil in Lolium perenne L. swards (84 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Enzyme
  • Ecology

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Agronomy, Carbon dioxide, Lolium perenne, Perennial plant and Animal science. His study in Fertilizer, Vegetative reproduction and Human fertilization is done as part of Agronomy. His Human fertilization study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Climate change, Crop yield and Field conditions.

His Carbon dioxide study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Photosynthesis. His Lolium perenne research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Biomass partitioning and Dry matter. His work focuses on many connections between Animal science and other disciplines, such as Nutrient, that overlap with his field of interest in Trifolium repens.

Best Publications

  • Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO2 Concentrations

    Stephen P. Long;Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Andrew D. B. Leakey;Josef Nösberger

  • Growth response of Trifolium repens L. and Lolium perenne L. as monocultures and bi‐species mixture to free air CO2 enrichment and management

    Thomas Hebeisen;Andreas Lüscher;Silvia Zanetti;Bernt Fischer

  • Stimulation of Symbiotic N2 Fixation in Trifolium repens L. under Elevated Atmospheric pCO2 in a Grassland Ecosystem.

    S. Zanetti;U. A. Hartwig;A. Luscher;T. Hebeisen

  • Evidence that P deficiency induces N feedback regulation of symbiotic N2 fixation in white clover (Trifolium repens L.)

    JoséP.F. Almeida;Ueli A. Hartwig;Marco Frehner;Josef Nösberger

  • Is stimulation of leaf photosynthesis by elevated carbon dioxide concentration maintained in the long term? A test with Lolium perenne grown for 10 years at two nitrogen fertilization levels under Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE)

    E. A. Ainsworth;P. A. Davey;G. J. Hymus;C. P. Osborne

  • Does nitrogen nutrition restrict the CO 2 response of fertile grassland lacking legumes

    S. Zanetti;U. A. Hartwig;C. van Kessel;A. Lüscher

  • Effect of Soil Moisture and Potassium Fertilizer on Shoot Water Potential, Photosynthesis and Partitioning of Carbon in Mungbean and Cowpea

    U. R. Sangakkara;M. Frehner;J. Nösberger

  • Yield response of Lolium perenne swards to free air CO2 enrichment increased over six years in a high N input system on fertile soil

    Markus Daepp;Daniel Suter;José P. F. Almeida;Hubert Isopp

  • Long-term responsiveness to free air CO2 enrichment of functional types, species and genotypes of plants from fertile permanent grassland.

    A. Lüscher;G. R. Hendrey;J. Nösberger

  • Direct evidence that symbiotic N2 fixation in fertile grassland is an important trait for a strong response of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2.

    Andreas Lüscher;Ueli A. Hartwig;Daniel Suter;Josef Nösberger

  • Symbiotically fixed nitrogen from field- grown white and red clover mixed with ryegrasses at low levels of15N-fertilization

    Unknown

  • Genetic variability of forage grass cultivars: A comparison of Festuca pratensis Huds., Lolium perenne L., and Dactylis glomerata L.

    R. Kölliker;F.J. Stadelmann;B. Reidy;J. Nösberger

  • Ten years of free-air CO2 enrichment altered the mobilization of N from soil in Lolium perenne L. swards

    Manuel K. Schneider;Andreas Lüscher;Michael Richter;Urs Aeschlimann

  • Elevated CO2 increases carbon allocation to the roots of Lolium perenne under free-air CO2 enrichment but not in a controlled environment

    Daniel Suter;Marco Frehner;Bernt U. Fischer;Josef Nösberger

  • Seasonal variation of fructan‐β‐fructosidase (FEH) activity and characterization of a β‐(2‐1)‐linkage specific FEH from tubers of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus)

    Stefan P. Marx;Josef Nösberger;Marco Frehner

  • Source-sink relations in Lolium perenne L. as reflected by carbohydrate concentrations in leaves and pseudo-stems during regrowth in a free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) experiment*

    B. U. Fischer;M. Frehner;T. Hebeisen;S. Zanetti

  • Regulation of Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase Activity in Intact Wheat Leaves by Light, CO2, and Temperature

    F. Mächler;J. Nösberger

  • Oxygen supply limits nitrogenase activity of clover nodules after defoliation

    U. Hartwig;B. Boller;J. Nösberger

  • Influence of Soil Moisture and Fertilizer Potassium on the Vegetative Growth of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)

    U. R. Sangakkara;M. Frehner;J. Nosberger

  • Symbiotic N2 fixation of various legume species along an altitudinal gradient in the Swiss Alps

    Katja A. Jacot;Andreas Lüscher;Josef Nösberger;Ueli A. Hartwig

  • Soil moisture and potassium affect the performance of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in faba bean and common bean

    U. Ravi Sangakkara;Ueli A. Hartwig;Josef Nösberger

Frequent Co-Authors

George R. Hendrey
George R. Hendrey City University of New York
Stephen P. Long
Stephen P. Long University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Hans Schnyder
Hans Schnyder Technical University of Munich
Elizabeth A. Ainsworth
Elizabeth A. Ainsworth University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
German Spangenberg
German Spangenberg La Trobe University
Alistair Rogers
Alistair Rogers Brookhaven National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Josef Nösberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles