World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joonha Park

Joonha Park

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4293
World Ranking
10269
National Ranking
32

Joonha Park publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joonha Park sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joonha Park D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joonha Park sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world

    Paul G. Bain;Paul G. Bain;Taciano L. Milfont;Yoshihisa Kashima;Michał Bilewicz

  • Negative emotions about climate change are related to insomnia symptoms and mental health: Cross-sectional evidence from 25 countries

    Charles Adedayo Ogunbode;Charles Adedayo Ogunbode;Ståle Pallesen;Gisela Böhm;Rouven Doran

  • Attributing Human Uniqueness and Human Nature to Cultural Groups: Distinct Forms of Subtle Dehumanization

    Paul Bain;Joonha Park;Christopher Kwok;Nick Haslam

  • Economic Inequality Is Linked to Biased Self-Perception

    Steve Loughnan;Steve Loughnan;Steve Loughnan;Peter Kuppens;Peter Kuppens;Jüri Allik;Katalin Balazs

  • Be Careful Where You Smile: Culture Shapes Judgments of Intelligence and Honesty of Smiling Individuals

    Kuba Krys;C. Melanie Vauclair;Colin A. Capaldi;Vivian Miu Chi Lun

  • Feeling bad about being sad: The role of social expectancies in amplifying negative mood.

    Brock Bastian;Peter Kuppens;Matthew J. Hornsey;Joonha Park

  • Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence.

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Michelle R vanDellen;Georgios Abakoumkin;Edward P Lemay

  • Public views of the Sustainable Development Goals across countries

    Paul Bain;Pieter M. Kroonenberg;Lars-Olof Johansson;Taciano l. Milfont

  • On the Relation Between Social Dominance Orientation and Environmentalism: A 25-Nation Study

    Taciano l. Milfont;Paul Bain;Yoshihisa Kashima;Victor Corral-Verdugo

  • Country-level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries.

    Peter K. Jonason;Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Jarosław Piotrowski;Constantine Sedikides

  • The mental health continuum-short form: The structure and application for cross-cultural studies-A 38 nation study.

    Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Jarosław P. Piotrowski;Evgeny N. Osin;Jan Cieciuch

  • Predictors of adherence to public health behaviors for fighting COVID-19 derived from longitudinal data

    Unknown

  • Putting the “we” into well-being : Using collectivism-themed measures of well-being attenuates well-being’s association with individualism

    Kuba Krys;John M. Zelenski;Colin A. Capaldi;Joonha Park

  • Personal life satisfaction as a measure of societal happiness is an individualistic presumption: evidence from fifty countries

    Kuba Krys;Kuba Krys;Joonha Park;Agata Kocimska-Zych;Aleksandra Kosiarczyk

  • On the relationship between valence and arousal in samples across the globe.

    Unknown

  • Structure of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen Across Eight World Regions

    Radoslaw Rogoza;Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Peter K. Jonason;Peter K. Jonason;Jarosław Piotrowski

  • Trust in government and its associations with health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Qin Han;Bang Zheng;Mioara Cristae;Maximilian Agostini

  • Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

    Unknown

  • Intergenerational conflicts of interest and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Shuxian Jin;Daniel Balliet;Angelo Romano;Giuliana Spadaro

  • Family well-being is valued more than personal well-being: A four-country study

    Kuba Krys;Kuba Krys;Colin A. Capaldi;John M. Zelenski;Joonha Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul G. Bain
Paul G. Bain University of Bath
Valdiney Veloso Gouveia
Valdiney Veloso Gouveia Federal University of Paraíba
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan University of Exeter
Taciano L. Milfont
Taciano L. Milfont University of Waikato
Yukiko Uchida
Yukiko Uchida Kyoto University
Yoshihisa Kashima
Yoshihisa Kashima University of Melbourne
Nick Haslam
Nick Haslam University of Melbourne
Michael Bond
Michael Bond Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Winnifred R. Louis
Winnifred R. Louis University of Queensland
Bertus F. Jeronimus
Bertus F. Jeronimus University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Joonha Park

Recently Published Articles