World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
17471
World Ranking
3490
National Ranking
1966

Jennings Bryant publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennings Bryant sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jennings Bryant D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennings Bryant sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jennings Bryant was affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States. Their academic work spanned several interdisciplinary fields, including Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, and Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

Their research covered various subfields, specifically Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, and Economics and Econometrics. This diverse academic focus suggests a broad approach to understanding media and societal impacts.

Jennings Bryant contributed to the study of several topics, among which Digital Games and Media, Media Influence and Health, and Cinema and Media Studies were prominent. These topics reflect a sustained interest in the effects and cultural significance of media forms.

The scholar collaborated frequently with notable co-authors, including Peter Vorderer, Christoph Klimmt, Mary Beth Oliver, and Arthur A. Raney. These collaborations indicate intersection with research communities focused on media effects and communication studies.

In terms of publications, Jennings Bryant authored a book titled Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (Edition 4), published in 2021 by the Directory of Open Access Books (OAPEN Foundation). This work contributes to academic discussions on media theory and its influence.

Best Publications

  • Media effects : advances in theory and research

    Jennings Bryant;Dolf compiladores Zillmann

  • Selective Exposure To Communication

    Dolf Zillmann;Jennings Bryant

  • Theory and Research in Mass Communication

    Jennings Bryant;Dorina Miron

  • Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 2nd ed.

    Jennings Bryant;Dolf Zillmann

  • Human Communication Theory and Research : Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges

    Robert L. Heath;Jennings Bryant

  • Playing Video Games : Motives, Responses, and Consequences

    Peter Vorderer;Jennings Bryant

  • Perspectives on Media Effects

    Jennings Bryant;Dolf Zillmann

  • Psychology of entertainment

    Jennings Bryant;Peter Vorderer

  • Enjoyment From Sports Spectatorship

    Dolf Zillmann;Jennings Bryant;Barry S. Sapolsky

  • Using television to alleviate boredom and stress: Selective exposure as a function of induced excitational states

    Jennings Bryant;Dolf Zillmann

  • Pornography and Sexual Callousness, and the Trivialization of Rape

    Dolf Zillmann;Jennings Bryant

  • Moral Judgment and Crime Drama: An Integrated Theory of Enjoyment

    Arthur A. Raney;Jennings Bryant

  • Responding To the Screen : Reception and Reaction Processes

    Jennings Bryant;Dolf Zillmann

  • Enhancement of experienced sexual arousal in response to erotic stimuli through misattribution of unrelated residual excitation.

    Joanne R. Cantor;Dolf Zillmann;Jennings Bryant

  • Relationship Between College Teachers' Use of Humor in the Classroom and Students' Evaluations of Their Teachers

    Jennings Bryant;Paul W. Comisky;Jon S. Crane;Dolf Zillmann

  • Pornography's Impact on Sexual Satisfaction1

    Dolf Zillmann;Jennings Bryant

  • Handbook of Sports and Media

    Arthur A. Raney;Jennings Bryant

  • Entertainment as media effect

    Jennings Bryant;Dorina Miron

  • Television and the American family

    Jennings Bryant;J. ALison Bryant

  • Effect of residual excitation on the emotional response to provocation and delayed aggressive behavior.

    Dolf Zillmann;Jennings Bryant

  • Children's Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension

    Jennings Bryant;Daniel R. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Dolf Zillmann
Dolf Zillmann University of Alabama
Aletha C. Huston
Aletha C. Huston The University of Texas at Austin
Robert L. Heath
Robert L. Heath University of Houston
Peter Vorderer
Peter Vorderer University of Mannheim
Daniel R. Anderson
Daniel R. Anderson University of Massachusetts Amherst
Joanne Cantor
Joanne Cantor University of Wisconsin–Madison
David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen
David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen Michigan State University
Mary Beth Oliver
Mary Beth Oliver Pennsylvania State University
James B. Weaver
James B. Weaver Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree opens doors to various online programs and rewarding career options in the USA. One popular pathway is social work, where graduates support individuals and communities in need. Each state sets unique educational and licensing requirements, so it's important to understand the steps involved in pursuing this career.

For example, if you’re interested in becoming a social worker in Maryland, you’ll need a relevant undergraduate or graduate degree, clinical experience, and to pass a licensing exam. Similarly, the steps for how to become a social worker in Massachusetts include earning a degree in social work, fieldwork, and licensure, which often varies by specialization.

Understanding Michigan social work education requirements and navigating Minnesota social work license requirements are crucial if you plan to practice in those states. By researching these paths, students can choose the right online degree and prepare for a meaningful career supporting mental health and social well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Jennings Bryant

Recently Published Articles