World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
33
Citations
3827
World Ranking
5729
National Ranking
183

Jana Kholova publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Kholova sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 93 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Jana Kholova D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Kholova sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Transpiration efficiency: new insights into an old story

    Vincent Vadez;Jana Kholova;Susan Medina;Aparna Kakkera

  • Constitutive water-conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]

    Jana Kholová;C. Tom Hash;Aparna Kakkera;Marie Kočová

  • Terminal drought-tolerant pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] have high leaf ABA and limit transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit

    Jana Kholová;Jana Kholová;C. T. Hash;P. Lava Kumar;Rattan S. Yadav

  • LeasyScan: a novel concept combining 3D imaging and lysimetry for high-throughput phenotyping of traits controlling plant water budget

    Vincent Vadez;Jana Kholová;Grégoire Hummel;Uladzimir Zhokhavets

  • Ecology and genomics of an important crop wild relative as a prelude to agricultural innovation.

    Eric J.B. von Wettberg;Eric J.B. von Wettberg;Peter L. Chang;Peter L. Chang;Fatma Başdemir;Noelia Carrasquila-Garcia

  • II.1.5 Phenotyping pearl millet for adaptation to drought.

    Vincent Vadez;Tom Hash;Francis R. Bidinger;Jana Kholova

  • Stay-green quantitative trait loci's effects on water extraction, transpiration efficiency and seed yield depend on recipient parent background

    Vincent Vadez;Santosh P. Deshpande;Jana Kholova;Graeme L. Hammer

  • Water: the most important 'molecular' component of water stress tolerance research

    Vincent Vadez;Jana Kholova;Mainassara Zaman-Allah;Mainassara Zaman-Allah;Nouhoun Belko

  • Small temporal differences in water uptake among varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) are critical for grain yield under terminal drought

    Vincent Vadez;Jana Kholova;Rattan Singh Yadav;Charles Thomas Hash

  • Breeding custom-designed crops for improved drought adaptation

    Rajeev K. Varshney;Rajeev K. Varshney;Rutwik Barmukh;Manish Roorkiwal;Yiping Qi

  • Modelling the effect of plant water use traits on yield and stay-green expression in sorghum

    Jana Kholová;Tharanya Murugesan;Sivasakthi Kaliamoorthy;Srikanth Malayee

  • Drought stress characterization of post-rainy season (rabi) sorghum in India

    Jana Kholová;Greg McLean;Vincent Vadez;Peter Craufurd

  • Response of maize genotypes to salinity stress in relation to osmolytes and metal-ions contents, oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activity.

    J. Kholová;R. K. Sairam;R.C. Meena;G. C. Srivastava

  • Water saving traits co-map with a major terminal drought tolerance quantitative trait locus in pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]

    Jana Kholová;T. Nepolean;C. Tom Hash;A. Supriya;A. Supriya

  • Maize, sorghum, and pearl millet have highly contrasting species strategies to adapt to water stress and climate change-like conditions

    Sunita Choudhary;Sunita Choudhary;Anirban Guha;Jana Kholova;Anand Pandravada

  • Plant vigour QTLs co-map with an earlier reported QTL hotspot for drought tolerance while water saving QTLs map in other regions of the chickpea genome

    Kaliamoorthy Sivasakthi;Kaliamoorthy Sivasakthi;Mahendar Thudi;Murugesan Tharanya;Murugesan Tharanya;Sandip M. Kale

  • CGIAR modeling approaches for resource-constrained scenarios: I. Accelerating crop breeding for a changing climate

    Julian Ramirez-Villegas;Julian Ramirez-Villegas;Anabel Molero Milan;Nickolai Alexandrov;Senthold Asseng

  • In pursuit of a better world: crop improvement and the CGIAR

    Jana Kholová;Milan Oldřich Urban;James Cock;Jairo Arcos

  • Chickpea Genotypes Contrasting for Vigor and Canopy Conductance Also Differ in Their Dependence on Different Water Transport Pathways.

    Kaliamoorthy Sivasakthi;Kaliamoorthy Sivasakthi;Murugesan Tharanya;Murugesan Tharanya;Jana Kholová;Ruth Wangari Muriuki

  • An integrated research framework combining genomics, systems biology, physiology, modelling and breeding for legume improvement in response to elevated CO2 under climate change scenario.

    Paramita Palit;Himabindu Kudapa;Robert B Zougmoré;Robert B Zougmoré;Jana Kholova

  • Does a terminal drought tolerance QTL contribute to differences in ROS scavenging enzymes and photosynthetic pigments in pearl millet exposed to drought

    Jana Kholová;Jana Kholová;C. Tom Hash;Marie Kočová;Vincent Vadez

  • Characterization of the main chickpea cropping systems in India using a yield gap analysis approach

    Amir Hajjarpoor;Vincent Vadez;Afshin Soltani;Pooran Gaur

  • Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for water use and crop production traits co-locate with major QTL for tolerance to water deficit in a fine-mapping population of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. R.Br.)

    Murugesan Tharanya;Murugesan Tharanya;Jana Kholova;Kaliamoorthy Sivasakthi;Kaliamoorthy Sivasakthi;Deepmala Seghal

  • Transpiration efficiency: insights from comparisons of C4 cereal species.

    Vincent Vadez;Vincent Vadez;Sunita Choudhary;Jana Kholová;C Tom Hash

  • Osmolytes and metal ions accumulation, oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activity as determinants of salinity stress tolerance in maize genotypes

    Jana Kholova;Jana Kholova;Raj Kumar Sairam;Ramesh C. Meena

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent Vadez
Vincent Vadez Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Rattan Yadav
Rattan Yadav Aberystwyth University
Rajeev K. Varshney
Rajeev K. Varshney Murdoch University
C. Tom Hash
C. Tom Hash International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland
Pooran M. Gaur
Pooran M. Gaur University of Western Australia
Matthew P. Reynolds
Matthew P. Reynolds International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Rakesh K. Srivastava
Rakesh K. Srivastava International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Parbodh C. Sharma
Parbodh C. Sharma Central Soil Salinity Research Institute
Julian Ramirez-Villegas
Julian Ramirez-Villegas Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jana Kholova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles