World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
10328
World Ranking
5703
National Ranking
2074

James S. Boyle publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James S. Boyle sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 100 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

James S. Boyle D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James S. Boyle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

James S. Boyle is affiliated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the United States. The scientist's research profile includes work connected to this institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, specific fields of study, subfields, main topics of work, or publication venues publicly listed for James S. Boyle at this time.

There are no records of book publications or awards associated with James S. Boyle in the current data.

The available information indicates an active professional status with no details suggesting the scientist is deceased.

Best Publications

  • An Overview of the Results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I)

    W. Lawrence Gates;James S. Boyle;Curt Covey;Clyde G. Dease

  • Statistical significance of trends and trend differences in layer-average atmospheric temperature time series

    B. D. Santer;T. M. L. Wigley;J. S. Boyle;D. J. Gaffen

  • Intraseasonal oscillations in 15 atmospheric general circulation models: results from an AMIP diagnostic subproject

    J. M. Slingo;K. R. Sperber;J. S. Boyle;J.-P. Ceron

  • Climatology and Interannual Variation of the East Asian Winter Monsoon: Results from the 1979-95 NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis

    Yi Zhang;Kenneth R. Sperber;James S. Boyle

  • Contributions of Anthropogenic and Natural Forcing to Recent Tropopause Height Changes

    B. D. Santer;M. F. Wehner;T. M. L. Wigley;R. Sausen

  • Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model

    A. Gettelman;Xiaohong Liu;S.J. Ghan;H. Morrison

  • Identification of human-induced changes in atmospheric moisture content

    B. D. Santer;C. Mears;F. J. Wentz;K. E. Taylor

  • Amplification of Surface Temperature Trends and Variability in the Tropical Atmosphere

    Benjamin D. Santer;Tom M. L. Wigley;Carl Mears;Frank J. Wentz

  • Behavior of tropopause height and atmospheric temperature in models, reanalyses, and observations: Decadal changes

    B. D. Santer;R. Sausen;T. M. L. Wigley;J. S. Boyle

  • Exposing Global Cloud Biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) Using Satellite Observations and Their Corresponding Instrument Simulators

    J. E. Kay;B. R. Hillman;B. R. Hillman;S. A. Klein;Y. Zhang

  • A Comparison of Recent Reanalysis Datasets Using Objective Feature Tracking: Storm Tracks and Tropical Easterly Waves

    Kevin Ivan Hodges;Brian John Hoskins;J. Boyle;C. Thorncroft

  • Are climate model simulations of clouds improving? An evaluation using the ISCCP simulator

    Stephen A. Klein;Yuying Zhang;Mark D. Zelinka;Robert Pincus

  • Evaluating Parameterizations in General Circulation Models: Climate Simulation Meets Weather Prediction

    Thomas J. Phillips;Gerald L. Potter;David L. Williamson;Richard T. Cederwall

  • Forced and unforced ocean temperature changes in Atlantic and Pacific tropical cyclogenesis regions

    B. D. Santer;T. M. L. Wigley;P. J. Gleckler;C. Bonfils

  • Identification of anthropogenic climate change using a second-generation reanalysis

    Benjamin D. Santer;Tom M. L. Wigley;Adrian J. Simmons;Per W. Kållberg

  • Uncertainties in observationally based estimates of temperature change in the free atmosphere

    B. D. Santer;J. J. Hnilo;T. M. L. Wigley;J. S. Boyle

  • Diagnosis of the summertime warm and dry bias over the U. S. Southern Great Plains in the GFDL climate model using a weather forecasting approach

    Stephen A. Klein;Xianan Jiang;Jim Boyle;Sergey Malyshev

  • A prototype two-decade fully-coupled fine-resolution CCSM simulation

    Julie L. McClean;Julie L. McClean;David C. Bader;David C. Bader;Frank O. Bryan;Mathew E. Maltrud

  • Simulation of the Northern Summer Monsoon in the ECMWF Model: Sensitivity to Horizontal Resolution

    Kennetu R. Sperber;Sultan Hameed;Gerald L. Potter;James S. Boyle

  • Multidecadal changes in the vertical temperature structure of the tropical troposphere

    Dian J. Gaffen;Benjamin D. Santer;James S. Boyle;John R. Christy

Frequent Co-Authors

Shaocheng Xie
Shaocheng Xie Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Benjamin D. Santer
Benjamin D. Santer Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Stephen A. Klein
Stephen A. Klein Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Karl E. Taylor
Karl E. Taylor Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Gerald A. Meehl
Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research
Xiaohong Liu
Xiaohong Liu Texas A&M University
Michael F. Wehner
Michael F. Wehner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Tom M. L. Wigley
Tom M. L. Wigley University of Adelaide
Peter J. Gleckler
Peter J. Gleckler Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
David L. Williamson
David L. Williamson National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many opt for flexible and affordable options, such as the online general studies bachelor degree cheap, which provides a broad foundation and can be tailored to include environmental topics.

For those seeking a more straightforward academic route, degrees highlighted under easiest bachelors degree programs can be an appealing choice to balance workload and timely graduation, especially when combined with environmental electives.

Specialized fields like geoscience offer a direct link to Environmental Sciences careers. Many look into top programs listed in geoscience online degree rankings to gain expertise in earth systems, vital for roles in conservation and resource management.

Additionally, mastery of spatial data is increasingly important, making Geographic Information Systems (GIS) crucial. Prospective students often pursue advanced studies through top gis masters programs to enhance their qualifications for careers in environmental analysis and planning.

Best Scientists Citing James S. Boyle

Recently Published Articles