World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James D. Friesen

James D. Friesen

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
51
Citations
7504
World Ranking
3879
National Ranking
148

James D. Friesen publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Friesen sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 116 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

James D. Friesen D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Friesen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

James D. Friesen is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their academic profile indicates ongoing engagement in research, although specific details of recent publications are not present.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues listed in the available data. The absence of these details suggests either a focus on other academic activities or an incomplete public record at this time.

No book publications have been noted, and there is no explicit documentation of main fields of study, subfields of study, or topics of research covered. This lack of specific subject information means the thematic areas of their work cannot be detailed.

Similarly, award recognitions or honors have not been documented, and the individual is currently listed as living. The available data centers primarily on their institutional affiliation rather than extensive bibliometric or thematic contributions.

Best Publications

  • A comparison of yeast ribosomal protein gene DNA sequences

    John L. Teem;Nadja Abovich;Norbert F. Kaufer;Willam F. Schwindinger

  • Genetics of eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III.

    J Archambault;J D Friesen

  • Protein production: feeding the crystallographers and NMR spectroscopists.

    Aled M. Edwards;Aled M. Edwards;Cheryl H. Arrowsmith;Dinesh Christendat;Akil Dharamsi

  • Mutations in the genome of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus responsible for the attenuation phenotype.

    R. Allende;G. F. Kutish;W. Laegreid;Z. Lu

  • Genetic interaction between transcription elongation factor TFIIS and RNA polymerase II.

    J Archambault;F Lacroute;A Ruet;J D Friesen

  • The nucleotide sequence and characterization of the relA gene of Escherichia coli.

    S Metzger;I B Dror;E Aizenman;G Schreiber

  • Mutations in a yeast intron demonstrate the importance of specific conserved nucleotides for the two stages of nuclear mRNA splicing

    Lynette A. Fouser;James D. Friesen

  • Recruiting TATA-binding protein to a promoter: transcriptional activation without an upstream activator.

    Hua Xiao;J. D. Friesen;J. T. Lis

  • Histone H1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    S. C. Ushinsky;H. Bussey;A. A. Ahmed;Y. Wang

  • Yeast CAL1 is a structural and functional homologue to the DPR1 (RAM) gene involved in ras processing.

    Y Ohya;M Goebl;L E Goodman;S Petersen-Bjørn

  • The accumulation of three yeast ribosomal proteins under conditions of excess mRNA is determined primarily by fast protein decay.

    E Maicas;F G Pluthero;J D Friesen

  • An RNA-dependent ATPase associated with U2/U6 snRNAs in pre-mRNA splicing.

    Deming Xu;Shahrzad Nouraini;Deborah Field;Shou-Jiang Tang

  • A New Relaxed Mutant of Escherichia coli with an Altered 50S Ribosomal Subunit

    J. D. Friesen;N. P. Fiil;J. M. Parker;William A. Haseltine

  • RNA Polymerase II Subunit Rpb9 Regulates Transcription Elongation in Vivo

    Sally A. Hemming;David B. Jansma;Pascale F. Macgregor;Andrew Goryachev

  • The product of the PRP4 gene of S. cerevisiae shows homology to β subunits of G proteins

    Michael A. Dalrymple;Sara Petersen-Bjorn;James D. Friesen;Jean D. Beggs

  • Protein interaction quantified in vivo by spectrally resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer

    Valerică Raicu;David B. Jansma;R. J. Dwayne Miller;James D. Friesen

  • In vivo analysis of the domains of yeast Rvs167p suggests Rvs167p function is mediated through multiple protein interactions.

    Karen Colwill;Deborah Field;Lynda Moore;James Friesen

  • Isolation of the SUP45 omnipotent suppressor gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterization of its gene product.

    H J Himmelfarb;E Maicas;J D Friesen

  • The deduced sequence of the transcription factor TFIIIA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals extensive divergence from Xenopus TFIIIA.

    J Archambault;C.A. Milne;K.T. Schappert;B Baum

  • Chimeric plasmids for cloning of deoxyribonucleic acid sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    R K Storms;J B McNeil;P S Khandekar;G An

Frequent Co-Authors

Aled M. Edwards
Aled M. Edwards Structural Genomics Consortium
Jack Greenblatt
Jack Greenblatt University of Toronto
J. John Holbrook
J. John Holbrook University of Bristol
Hua Xiao
Hua Xiao Michigan State University
John T. Lis
John T. Lis Cornell University
Howard Bussey
Howard Bussey McGill University
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith Structural Genomics Consortium
John L. Woolford
John L. Woolford Carnegie Mellon University
Gynheung An
Gynheung An Kyung Hee University
Brenda J. Andrews
Brenda J. Andrews University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Genetics can open doors to many dynamic fields in healthcare and life sciences. Many students interested in Genetics also consider related programs in nursing and healthcare administration. If you’re weighing your options, you may wonder questions like do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school. Some nursing schools offer flexible admissions, while others require standardized entrance exams.

For those considering advanced roles in healthcare, affordability and flexibility matter. You might be interested in the cheapest mha programs online to further your career in healthcare administration without taking on excessive debt. Alternatively, prospective nurses can benefit from accelerated pathways like an lpn fast track program, which allows students to enter the workforce more quickly.

Advancing into high-level clinical or educational roles may require pursuing a doctorate. Those seeking this path should explore the cheapest online dnp programs to make their education more accessible and cost-effective.

Whether your goal is to become a genetic counselor, healthcare leader, or nursing educator, there are multiple affordable online pathways to get started.

Best Scientists Citing James D. Friesen

Recently Published Articles