World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jakob-Moritz Eberl

Jakob-Moritz Eberl

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
23
Citations
2472
World Ranking
1769
National Ranking
11

Jakob-Moritz Eberl publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jakob-Moritz Eberl sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 72 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Jakob-Moritz Eberl D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jakob-Moritz Eberl sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 23 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The European media discourse on immigration and its effects: a literature review

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Christine E. Meltzer;Tobias Heidenreich;Beatrice Herrero

  • One Bias Fits All? Three Types of Media Bias and Their Effects on Party Preferences

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Markus Wagner

  • From populism to the "plandemic": why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies

    Jakob Moritz Eberl;Robert A. Huber;Esther Greussing

  • Media Framing Dynamics of the ‘European Refugee Crisis’: A Comparative Topic Modelling Approach

    Tobias Heidenreich;Fabienne Lind;Jakob Moritz Eberl;Hajo G. Boomgaarden

  • The Austrian Corona Panel Project: monitoring individual and societal dynamics amidst the COVID-19 crisis

    Bernhard Kittel;Sylvia Kritzinger;Hajo Boomgaarden;Barbara Prainsack

  • What’s in a post? How sentiment and issue salience affect users’ emotional reactions on Facebook

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Petro Tolochko;Pablo Jost;Tobias Heidenreich

  • In Validations We Trust? The Impact of Imperfect Human Annotations as a Gold Standard on the Quality of Validation of Automated Content Analysis

    Hyunjin Song;Petro Tolochko;Jakob Moritz Eberl;Olga Eisele

  • From novelty to normalization? How journalists use the term “Fake news” in their reporting

    Jana Laura Egelhofer;Loes Aaldering;Jakob Moritz Eberl;Sebastian Galyga

  • From populism to climate scepticism: the role of institutional trust and attitudes towards science

    Robert A. Huber;Esther Greussing;Jakob-Moritz Eberl

  • Political migration discourses on social media: a comparative perspective on visibility and sentiment across political Facebook accounts in Europe

    Tobias Heidenreich;Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Fabienne Lind;Hajo Boomgaarden

  • Policy-Relevant Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination: Associations With Demography, Health Risk, and Social and Political Factors.

    Katharina T Paul;Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Julia Partheymüller

  • Are Perceptions of Candidate Traits Shaped by the Media? The Effects of Three Types of Media Bias:

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Markus Wagner;Hajo G. Boomgaarden

  • Austrian Corona Panel Project (SUF edition)

    Bernhard Kittel;Sylvia Kritzinger;Hajo Boomgaarden;Barbara Prainsack

  • Less fragmented than we thought? toward clarification of a subdisciplinary linkage in communication science, 2010-2019

    Hyunjin Song;Jakob Moritz Eberl;Olga Eisele

  • Populist attitudes towards politics and science: how do they differ?

    Unknown

  • Media effects on policy preferences toward free movement: evidence from five EU member states

    Christine E. Meltzer;Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Nora Theorin;Tobias Heidenreich

  • Audience expectations of journalism: What’s politics got to do with it?:

    Andreas Riedl;Jakob-Moritz Eberl

  • A tale of firsts: the 2019 Austrian snap election

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Lena Maria Huber;Carolina Plescia

  • Lying press: Three levels of perceived media bias and their relationship with political preferences

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl

  • Do humble beginnings help? How politician class roots shape voter evaluations.

    Nick Vivyan;Markus Wagner;Konstantin Glinitzer;Jakob-Moritz Eberl

Frequent Co-Authors

Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna
Carolina Plescia
Carolina Plescia University of Vienna
Jesper Strömbäck
Jesper Strömbäck University of Gothenburg
Sylvia Kritzinger
Sylvia Kritzinger University of Vienna
Markus Wagner
Markus Wagner University of Vienna
Wolfgang C. Müller
Wolfgang C. Müller University of Vienna
Thomas M. Meyer
Thomas M. Meyer Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Barbara Prainsack
Barbara Prainsack University of Vienna
Martin Dolezal
Martin Dolezal University of Graz
Robert Huber
Robert Huber Agricultural & Applied Economics Association

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jakob-Moritz Eberl

Recently Published Articles