World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jakob-Moritz Eberl

Jakob-Moritz Eberl

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 23 1769 1625 11 10 72 2472

Jakob-Moritz Eberl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jakob-Moritz Eberl between 2013 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jakob-Moritz Eberl published across 13 years, from 2013 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2020. 12 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2013 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2020. 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications
2013 2025

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jakob-Moritz Eberl: publications per year, 2013 to 2025
Year Publications
2013 2
2014 4
2015 0
2016 4
2017 5
2018 4
2019 8
2020 18
2021 15
2022 10
2023 4
2024 6
2025 6
Total 86
Download as CSV

Jakob-Moritz Eberl publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jakob-Moritz Eberl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–75 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 72 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62 72
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Jakob-Moritz Eberl D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jakob-Moritz Eberl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 23 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 23 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68 23
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • The European media discourse on immigration and its effects: a literature review

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Christine E. Meltzer;Tobias Heidenreich;Beatrice Herrero

  • One Bias Fits All? Three Types of Media Bias and Their Effects on Party Preferences

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Hajo G. Boomgaarden;Markus Wagner

  • From populism to the "plandemic": why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies

    Jakob Moritz Eberl;Robert A. Huber;Esther Greussing

  • Media Framing Dynamics of the ‘European Refugee Crisis’: A Comparative Topic Modelling Approach

    Tobias Heidenreich;Fabienne Lind;Jakob Moritz Eberl;Hajo G. Boomgaarden

  • From novelty to normalization? How journalists use the term “Fake news” in their reporting

    Jana Laura Egelhofer;Loes Aaldering;Jakob Moritz Eberl;Sebastian Galyga

  • From populism to climate scepticism: the role of institutional trust and attitudes towards science

    Robert A. Huber;Esther Greussing;Jakob-Moritz Eberl

  • Political migration discourses on social media: a comparative perspective on visibility and sentiment across political Facebook accounts in Europe

    Tobias Heidenreich;Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Fabienne Lind;Hajo Boomgaarden

  • Policy-Relevant Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination: Associations With Demography, Health Risk, and Social and Political Factors.

    Katharina T Paul;Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Julia Partheymüller

  • Are Perceptions of Candidate Traits Shaped by the Media? The Effects of Three Types of Media Bias:

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Markus Wagner;Hajo G. Boomgaarden

  • Austrian Corona Panel Project (SUF edition)

    Bernhard Kittel;Sylvia Kritzinger;Hajo Boomgaarden;Barbara Prainsack

  • Less fragmented than we thought? toward clarification of a subdisciplinary linkage in communication science, 2010-2019

    Hyunjin Song;Jakob Moritz Eberl;Olga Eisele

  • Populist attitudes towards politics and science: how do they differ?

    Unknown

  • Media effects on policy preferences toward free movement: evidence from five EU member states

    Christine E. Meltzer;Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Nora Theorin;Tobias Heidenreich

  • Audience expectations of journalism: What’s politics got to do with it?:

    Andreas Riedl;Jakob-Moritz Eberl

  • A tale of firsts: the 2019 Austrian snap election

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl;Lena Maria Huber;Carolina Plescia

  • Lying press: Three levels of perceived media bias and their relationship with political preferences

    Jakob-Moritz Eberl

  • Do humble beginnings help? How politician class roots shape voter evaluations.

    Nick Vivyan;Markus Wagner;Konstantin Glinitzer;Jakob-Moritz Eberl

Frequent Co-Authors

Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna
Carolina Plescia
Carolina Plescia University of Vienna
Jesper Strömbäck
Jesper Strömbäck University of Gothenburg
Sylvia Kritzinger
Sylvia Kritzinger University of Vienna
Markus Wagner
Markus Wagner University of Vienna
Wolfgang C. Müller
Wolfgang C. Müller University of Vienna
Thomas M. Meyer
Thomas M. Meyer Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Barbara Prainsack
Barbara Prainsack University of Vienna
Martin Dolezal
Martin Dolezal University of Graz
Robert Huber
Robert Huber Agricultural & Applied Economics Association

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jakob-Moritz Eberl

Recently Published Articles