World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Allan Hanbury

Allan Hanbury

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
11719
World Ranking
6379
National Ranking
48

Allan Hanbury publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan Hanbury sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 324 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Allan Hanbury D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan Hanbury sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Allan Hanbury is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, focusing particularly on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Molecular Biology. Their research covers a range of interdisciplinary topics including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition as well as aspects of Political Science and International Relations.

The scientist's work frequently engages with several specialized topics, such as:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Hanbury's publication record includes recent papers that demonstrate involvement in image segmentation, neural ranking models, and biomedical informatics. Notable papers include:

  • "An annotated fluorescence image dataset for training nuclear segmentation methods," 2020, Scientific Data
  • "Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Complex Immunofluorescence Nuclear Image Segmentation," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • "Improving Efficient Neural Ranking Models with Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillation," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Improving Efficient Neural Ranking Models with Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillation," 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "Effective matching of patients to clinical trials using entity extraction and neural re-ranking," 2023, Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Sebastian Hofstätter
  • Sophia Althammer
  • Mete Sertkan
  • Markus Zlabinger
  • Wojciech Kusa

Hanbury has published multiple papers in prominent venues with a focus on preprint archives and conference series. The most common publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ACM SIGIR Forum
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Additionally, the researcher has contributed to book publications through Springer Science+Business Media, including the title "Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction" published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool

    Abdel Aziz Taha;Allan Hanbury

  • Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory

    Jana Machajdik;Allan Hanbury

  • An Efficient Algorithm for Calculating the Exact Hausdorff Distance

    Abdel Aziz Taha;Allan Hanbury

  • Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care

    Lena Maier-Hein;Matthias Eisenmann;Annika Reinke;Sinan Onogur

  • Making sense of big data in health research: Towards an EU action plan

    Charles Auffray;Charles Auffray;Rudi Balling;Inês Barroso;László Bencze

  • Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Sampling

    Sebastian Hofstätter;Sheng-Chieh Lin;Jheng-Hong Yang;Jimmy Lin

  • Morphological operators on the unit circle

    A.G. Hanbury;J. Serra

  • A survey of methods for image annotation

    Allan Hanbury

  • Finding defects in texture using regularity and local orientation

    Dmitry Chetverikov;Allan Hanbury

  • Color based skin classification

    Rehanullah Khan;Allan Hanbury;Julian Stöttinger;Abdul Bais

  • Cloud-Based Evaluation of Anatomical Structure Segmentation and Landmark Detection Algorithms: VISCERAL Anatomy Benchmarks

    Oscar Jimenez-del-Toro;Henning Muller;Markus Krenn;Katharina Gruenberg

  • A 3D-polar coordinate colour representation well adapted to image analysis

    Allan Hanbury

  • Visual Methods for Analyzing Probabilistic Classification Data

    Bilal Alsallakh;Allan Hanbury;Helwig Hauser;Silvia Miksch

  • Mathematical Morphology in the HLS Colour Space

    Allan Hanbury;Jean Serra

  • BIAS: Transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challenges.

    Lena Maier-Hein;Annika Reinke;Michal Kozubek;Anne L. Martel

  • ShARe/CLEF eHealth Evaluation Lab 2014, Task 3: User-centred health information retrieval

    Lorraine Goeuriot;Liadh Kelly;Wei Li;João R. M. Palotti

  • MATHEMATICAL MORPHOLOGY IN THE CIELAB SPACE

    Allan Hanbury;Jean Serra

  • Utilization and perceived problems of online medical resources and search tools among different groups of European physicians.

    Marlene Kritz;Manfred Gschwandtner;Veronika Stefanov;Allan Hanbury

  • Skin detection: A random forest approach

    Rehanullah Khan;Allan Hanbury;Julian Stoettinger

  • Constructing cylindrical coordinate colour spaces

    Allan Hanbury

  • Improving Efficient Neural Ranking Models with Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillation.

    Sebastian Hofstätter;Sophia Althammer;Michael Schröder;Mete Sertkan

Frequent Co-Authors

Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Georg Langs
Georg Langs Medical University of Vienna
Guido Zuccon
Guido Zuccon University of Queensland
Bjoern H. Menze
Bjoern H. Menze University of Zurich
Nicu Sebe
Nicu Sebe University of Trento
Matthias Samwald
Matthias Samwald Medical University of Vienna
Christoph Bock
Christoph Bock Austrian Academy of Sciences
Theo Gevers
Theo Gevers University of Amsterdam
Jean Serra
Jean Serra Mines ParisTech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up diverse paths for further study and professional growth. Many students pursue specialized online degrees that align with tech industries, such as online electrical engineering career outcomes that prepare graduates for roles in energy, automation, and high-tech manufacturing.

For those seeking a quicker entry into the workforce, consider easy certifications that pay well. These programs focus on key IT, cybersecurity, and data skills that are highly valued by employers and often require less time to complete than traditional degrees.

Advancing your education can also be streamlined with shortest masters degree programs online. These flexible, accelerated options allow you to earn a master’s in as little as a year, helping you compete for advanced and specialized technology positions.

If you’re considering a long-term investment in your career, look for the most useful masters degrees in fields like artificial intelligence, data science, or software engineering—areas consistently in high demand across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Allan Hanbury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles