World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
3769
World Ranking
7921
National Ranking
488

J M Kranabetter publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J M Kranabetter sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 69 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

J M Kranabetter D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J M Kranabetter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

J M Kranabetter is affiliated with the British Columbia Ministry of Forests in Canada. Their research spans multiple aspects of forest ecology, plant interactions, and soil science, focusing primarily on temperate coastal rainforests and the biogeochemical processes that underpin forest productivity and health.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Phosphorus deficiencies invoke optimal allocation of exoenzymes by ectomycorrhizas, 2021, The ISME Journal
  • Manganese limitations and the enhanced soil carbon sequestration of temperate rainforests, 2021, Biogeochemistry
  • Contrasting conifer species productivity in relation to soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of British Columbia perhumid rainforests, 2020, Biogeosciences
  • Post-disturbance conifer tree-ring δ 15 N reflects openness of the nitrogen cycle across temperate coastal rainforests, 2020, Journal of Ecology
  • Productivity of coastal Douglas-fir and western redcedar in response to species mixture, planting density, and soil carbon:nitrogen ratio, 2021, Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Their coauthors frequently include:

  • B. J. Hawkins
  • Dave Dunn
  • Melanie D. Jones
  • Timothy J. Philpott
  • Louise de Montigny

Frequent venues for their publications are:

  • New Phytologist
  • The ISME Journal
  • Biogeochemistry
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • Biogeosciences

Their main fields of study are Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science. Within these fields, they focus on the following subfields:

  • Plant Science
  • Insect Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Soil Science
  • Cell Biology

Kranabetter's work centers on several main topics including:

  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport

Their research explores nutrient limitations such as phosphorus and manganese in forest soils and their influence on carbon sequestration and tree productivity. The use of isotopic analysis in tree rings to understand nitrogen cycling further characterizes their approach to assessing ecosystem processes and forest health. Their studies emphasize the interactions between conifer species, soil nutrient stoichiometry, and environmental variables across the wet rainforest ecosystems of British Columbia.

Best Publications

  • Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent

    Diana H. Wall;Mark A. Bradford;Mark G. St. John;John A. Trofymow

  • Silvicultural disturbance severity and plant communities of the southern Canadian boreal forest

    Sybille Haeussler;Lorne Bedford;Alain Leduc;Yves Bergeron

  • Soil physical property changes at the North American long-term soil productivity study sites: 1 and 5 years after compaction

    Deborah S Page-Dumroese;Martin F Jurgensen;Allan E Tiarks;Felix Ponder

  • Convergence of soil nitrogen isotopes across global climate gradients

    Joseph M. Craine;Andrew J. Elmore;Lixin Wang;Laurent Augusto

  • Effects of organic matter removal, soil compaction, and vegetation control on 5-year seedling performance: a regional comparison of Long-Term Soil Productivity sites

    Robert L. Fleming;Robert F. Powers;Neil W. Foster;J. Marty Kranabetter

  • Effects of organic matter removal, soil compaction and vegetation control on 10th year biomass and foliar nutrition: LTSP continent-wide comparisons

    Felix Ponder Jr.;Robert L. Fleming;Shannon Berch;Matt D. Busse

  • Forest harvesting reduces the soil metagenomic potential for biomass decomposition

    Erick Cardenas;J M Kranabetter;Graeme Hope;Kendra R Maas

  • Diversity and species distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi along productivity gradients of a southern boreal forest

    J. M. Kranabetter;D. M. Durall;W. H. MacKenzie

  • Ectomycorrhizal community structure across forest openings on naturally regenerated western hemlock seedlings

    J M Kranabetter;T Wylie

  • Ectomycorrhizal mushroom distribution by stand age in western hemlock - lodgepole pine forests of northwestern British Columbia

    J M Kranabetter;J Friesen;S Gamiet;P Kroeger

  • Indices of dissolved organic nitrogen, ammonium and nitrate across productivity gradients of boreal forests

    J.M. Kranabetter;C.R. Dawson;D.E. Dunn

  • The effect of refuge trees on a paper birch ectomycorrhiza community

    J M Kranabetter

  • Effects of organic matter removal and soil compaction on fifth-year mineral soil carbon and nitrogen contents for sites across the United States and Canada

    Felipe G. Sanchez;Allan E. Tiarks;J. Marty Kranabetter;Deborah S. Page-Dumroese

  • Epigeous fruiting bodies of ectomycorrhizal fungi as indicators of soil fertility and associated nitrogen status of boreal forests

    J. M. Kranabetter;J. Friesen;S. Gamiet;P. Kroeger

  • Distribution and abundance of littoral benthic fauna in Canadian prairie saline lakes

    Unknown

  • Ectomycorrhizal mushroom response to partial cutting in a western hemlock - western redcedar forest

    J M Kranabetter;P Kroeger

  • The Contrasting Response to Soil Disturbance between Lodgepole Pine and Hybrid White Spruce in Subboreal Forests

    J. M. Kranabetter;P. Sanborn;B. K. Chapman;S. Dube

  • Ectomycorrhizal community structure on western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) seedlings transplanted from forests into openings.

    J M Kranabetter;J Friesen

  • A comparison of ectomycorrhiza communities from three conifer species planted on forest gap edges

    J M Kranabetter;S Hayden;E F Wright

  • Effectiveness of green-tree retention in the conservation of ectomycorrhizal fungi

    Unknown

  • A Framework to Assess Biogeochemical Response to Ecosystem Disturbance Using Nutrient Partitioning Ratios

    J. Marty Kranabetter;Kendra K. McLauchlan;Sara K. Enders;Jennifer M. Fraterrigo

  • Species patterns in foliar nitrogen concentration, nitrogen content and 13C abundance for understory saplings across light gradients

    J. M. Kranabetter;S. W. Simard;R. D. Guy;K. D. Coates

Frequent Co-Authors

William W. Mohn
William W. Mohn University of British Columbia
Steven J. Hallam
Steven J. Hallam University of British Columbia
Yves Bergeron
Yves Bergeron Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Alain Leduc
Alain Leduc University of Quebec at Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse career options both in and outside of direct scientific research. For those interested in applying their environmental science background to healthcare roles, there are flexible pathways that don't require starting from scratch. For example, if you have a non-nursing degree, you might pursue a non nursing degree to bsn online through accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing programs. This allows science graduates to transition into the nursing profession efficiently.

For career changers drawn to speech and communication sciences, there are specific speech language pathology bridge programs online that help non-SLP majors qualify for graduate studies in that field.

Advanced practice roles like nurse practitioner offer further specialization and earning potential. You may wonder, how to become a np in the shortest possible time or what different fields pay. For example, those interested in mental health might research DNP-PMHNP positions—find more about dnp pmhnp salary by state to compare options.

With flexible online options and bridge programs, ecological and evolutionary science graduates have a variety of rewarding career pathways to explore.

Best Scientists Citing J M Kranabetter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles