World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
9954
World Ranking
5201
National Ranking
1911

J.-G. Schilling publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J.-G. Schilling sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 72 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

J.-G. Schilling D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J.-G. Schilling sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Geochemistry Fellow Honor, Geochemical Society and the European Association of Geochemistry

Overview

J.-G. Schilling is affiliated with the University of Rhode Island in the United States. Over their academic career, they have been recognized as a Geochemistry Fellow by both the Geochemical Society and the European Association of Geochemistry in 1996.

Their work primarily intersects with geochemistry, given the nature of the fellowship awarded. Although specific research topics, papers, and publication venues are not detailed in the available data, the award from prominent geochemical organizations indicates a focus on geological chemical processes or related fields.

The absence of listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues prevents a detailed mapping of their publication record or collaboration network. There is also no information about subfields, main fields beyond the general indication of geochemistry, or main topics directly derived from their research output.

The scientist is currently active, as there is no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Iceland Mantle Plume: Geochemical Study of Reykjanes Ridge

    J.-G. Schilling

  • Petrologic and geochemical variations along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge from 29 degrees N to 73 degrees N

    J. G. Schilling;M. Zajac;R. Evans;T. Johnston

  • Basalts from Iceland and Along the Reykjanes Ridge: Sr Isotope Geochemistry

    S. R. Hart;J.-G. Schilling;J. L. Powell

  • Azores mantle blob: Rare-earth evidence

    J.-G. Schilling

  • Upper mantle heterogeneities and dynamics

    J.-G. Schilling

  • Hotspot-migrating ridge interaction in the South Atlantic

    J. G. Schilling;G. Thompson;R. Kingsley;S. Humphris

  • Helium and hydrogen isotopes in ocean-ridge basalts north and south of Iceland

    R. Poreda;J.-G. Schilling;H. Craig

  • Galapagos Hot Spot-Spreading Center System: 1. Spatial petrological and geochemical variations (83°W-101°W)

    J.-G. Schilling;R. H. Kingsley;J. D. Devine

  • Helium isotopic variations in the mantle beneath the central North Atlantic Ocean

    M.D. Kurz;W.J. Jenkins;J.G. Schilling;S.R. Hart

  • Pb isotope evidence in the South Atlantic for migrating ridge-hotspot interactions

    B. B. Hanan;R. H. Kingsley;J.-G. Schilling

  • Spinels in Mid-Atlantic Ridge basalts: Chemistry and occurrence

    Haraldur Sigurdsson;J.-G. Schilling

  • Afar Mantle Plume: Rare Earth Evidence

    J. G. Schilling

  • Easter Volcanic Chain (southeast Pacific): A mantle hot line

    E. Bonatti;C. G. A. Harrison;D. E. Fisher;J. Honnorez

  • Rare‐Earth variations across ‘normal segments’ of the Reykjanes Ridge, 60°–53°N, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge, 29°S, and East Pacific Rise, 2°–19°S, and evidence on the composition of the underlying low‐velocity layer

    Unknown

  • Nd and Sr isotopes in ultrapotassic volcanic rocks from the Leucite Hills, Wyoming

    R. Vollmer;P. Ogden;J. G. Schilling;R. H. Kingsley

  • Sea-floor evolution: rare-earth evidence

    Unknown

  • Iceland Mantle Plume

    J.-G. Schilling

  • Evidence for the Azores mantle plume from strontium isotope geochemistry of the Central North Atlantic

    W. M. White;J.-G. Schilling;S. R. Hart;S. R. Hart

  • Origin of chlorine and bromine in the oceans

    J.-G. Schilling;C. K. Unni;M. L. Bender

  • Faeroe-Iceland plume: Rare-earth evidence

    J. G. Schilling;A. Noe-Nygaard

  • Titan: A new facility for ultraclean sampling of trace elements and isotopes in the deep oceans in the international Geotraces program

    H. J. W. De Baar;K.R. Timmermans;Patrick Laan;H.H. De Porto

  • Mantle heterogeneity beneath the southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: trace element evidence for contamination of ambient asthenospheric mantle

    P.J le Roux;A.P le Roex;J.-G Schilling;N Shimizu

  • Understanding Melt Generation Beneath the Slow- Spreading Kolbeinsey Ridge Using (238)U, (230)Th , and (231)Pa Excesses

    L. J. Elkins;L. J. Elkins;K. W. W. Sims;K. W. W. Sims;J. Prytulak;J. Prytulak;T. Elliott

  • Melt generation beneath Arctic Ridges: Implications from Ule

    Lynne J Elkins;K. W. Sims;J. Prytulak;J. Blichert-Toft

  • ( 234 U/ 238 U) and ( 230 Th/ 238 U) disequilibria in fresh and altered Kolbeinsey Ridge basalts

    L. J. Elkins;K. W. W. Sims;J. Prytulak;N. Mattielli

  • (U-234/U-238) and (Th-230/U-238) disequilibria in fresh and altered Kolbeinsey Ridge basalts

    L. J. Elkins;K. W. W. Sims;J. Prytulak;N. Mattielli

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie Prytulak
Julie Prytulak Durham University
Kenneth W.W. Sims
Kenneth W.W. Sims University of Wyoming
Janne Blichert-Toft
Janne Blichert-Toft École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Tim Elliott
Tim Elliott University of Bristol
Jerzy S. Blusztajn
Jerzy S. Blusztajn Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Susan E. Humphris
Susan E. Humphris Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Stanley R. Hart
Stanley R. Hart Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Colin W. Devey
Colin W. Devey GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Nadine Mattielli
Nadine Mattielli Université Libre de Bruxelles
George E. Thompson
George E. Thompson University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students consider an dsw programs to specialize in sustainability and community-focused environmental work, blending social science with ecological principles.

If you seek flexibility, an affordable online general studies degree can provide a broad foundation with the option to tailor coursework towards environmental topics.

For those looking for straightforward academic routes, some choose the easiest degree to get while gaining essential environmental knowledge, balancing workload and learning outcomes effectively.

Specialized degrees like an online geology degree focus on earth sciences, preparing graduates for careers in natural resource management, environmental consulting, and hazard assessment. These pathways highlight the flexible and interdisciplinary nature of environmental studies careers.

Best Scientists Citing J.-G. Schilling