World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
20340
World Ranking
16924
National Ranking
6973

Iain D. C. Fraser publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iain D. C. Fraser sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 132 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Iain D. C. Fraser D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iain D. C. Fraser sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Iain D. C. Fraser is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Immunology and Microbiology. Within these fields, prominent subfields of focus include Immunology, Molecular Biology, Biophysics, Epidemiology, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's work covers a number of main topics, with significant attention given to inflammasome and immune disorders, immune response and inflammation, and immune cells in cancer. Other topics of interest include cell image analysis techniques, immune responses and vaccinations, gut microbiota and health, and IL-33, ST2, and ILC pathways.

Among their recent scientific papers are:

  • Commensal-driven immune zonation of the liver promotes host defence (2020, Nature)
  • Arachidonic acid inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome is a mechanism to explain the anti-inflammatory effects of fasting (2024, Cell Reports)
  • Lipid regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activity through organelle stress (2021, Trends in Immunology)
  • Biphasic JNK signaling reveals distinct MAP3K complexes licensing inflammasome formation and pyroptosis (2023, Cell Death and Differentiation)
  • Species-Specific Endotoxin Stimulus Determines Toll-Like Receptor 4- and Caspase 11-Mediated Pathway Activation Characteristics (2021, mSystems)

Their frequent co-authors include Clinton J. Bradfield, Jing Sun, J. Liang, Sinu P John, and Michael G. Dorrington. This network highlights ongoing collaborations that contribute to their research output.

Significant venues for publication in their career include The Journal of Immunology, Nature, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cell Reports, and Nature Communications. These reflect a consistent presence in leading journals and preprint servers within the biological and immunological sciences.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Regulation of NMDA Receptors by an Associated Phosphatase-Kinase Signaling Complex

    Ryan S. Westphal;Steven J. Tavalin;Jerry W. Lin;Neal M. Alto

  • Interaction of the regulatory subunit (RII) of cAMP-dependent protein kinase with RII-anchoring proteins occurs through an amphipathic helix binding motif.

    Daniel W. Carr;Renata E. Stofko-Hahn;Iain D C Fraser;Sarah M. Bishop

  • NF-κB Signaling in Macrophages: Dynamics, Crosstalk, and Signal Integration.

    Michael G. Dorrington;Iain D. C. Fraser

  • Association of the type II cAMP-dependent protein kinase with a human thyroid RII-anchoring protein. Cloning and characterization of the RII-binding domain.

    Daniel W. Carr;Zachary E. Hausken;Iain D C Fraser;Renata E. Stofko-Hahn

  • A single lentiviral vector platform for microRNA-based conditional RNA interference and coordinated transgene expression

    Kum Joo Shin;Estelle A. Wall;Joelle R. Zavzavadjian;Leah A. Santat

  • Localization of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase to the postsynaptic densities by A-kinase anchoring proteins. Characterization of AKAP 79.

    Daniel W. Carr;Renata E. Stofko-Hahn;Iain D C Fraser;Roger D. Cone

  • Use of a cAMP BRET Sensor to Characterize a Novel Regulation of cAMP by the Sphingosine 1-Phosphate/G13 Pathway

    Lily I. Jiang;Julie Collins;Richard Davis;Keng Mean Lin

  • A novel lipid-anchored A-kinase Anchoring Protein facilitates cAMP-responsive membrane events.

    Iain D. C. Fraser;Steven J. Tavalin;Linda B. Lester;Lorene K. Langeberg

  • Assembly of an A kinase-anchoring protein–β2-adrenergic receptor complex facilitates receptor phosphorylation and signaling

    Iain D.C. Fraser;Mei Cong;Jihee Kim;Emily N. Rollins

  • Phagocytosis by neutrophils induces an amino acid deprivation response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans

    Ifat Rubin-Bejerano;Iain Fraser;Paula Grisafi;Gerald R. Fink

  • Inflammatory monocytes regulate pathologic responses to commensals during acute gastrointestinal infection

    John R Grainger;Elizabeth A Wohlfert;Ivan J Fuss;Nicolas Bouladoux

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Involvement of specific macrophage-lineage cells surrounding arterioles in barrier and scavenger function in brain cortex.

    Masao Mato;Shigeo Ookawara;Atsushi Sakamoto;Eizo Aikawa

  • Suppression of LPS-induced TNF-α production in macrophages by cAMP Is mediated by PKA-AKAP95-p105

    Estelle A. Wall;Joelle R. Zavzavadjian;Mi Sook Chang;Baljinder Randhawa

  • Regulation of Membrane Targeting of the G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 2 by Protein Kinase A and Its Anchoring Protein AKAP79

    Mei Cong;Stephen J. Perry;Fang Tsyr Lin;Iain D. Fraser

  • Systems Biology in Immunology: A Computational Modeling Perspective ∗

    Ronald N. Germain;Martin Meier-Schellersheim;Aleksandra Nita-Lazar;Iain D.C. Fraser

  • U2AF1 mutations induce oncogenic IRAK4 isoforms and activate innate immune pathways in myeloid malignancies.

    Molly A. Smith;Molly A. Smith;Gaurav S. Choudhary;Andrea Pellagatti;Kwangmin Choi

  • Commensal-driven immune zonation of the liver promotes host defence

    Anita Gola;Anita Gola;Michael G. Dorrington;Emily Speranza;Claudia Sala

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald N. Germain
Ronald N. Germain National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
John D. Scott
John D. Scott University of Washington
Melvin I. Simon
Melvin I. Simon California Institute of Technology
Steven B. Marston
Steven B. Marston National Institutes of Health
William E. Seaman
William E. Seaman University of California, San Francisco
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Paul C. Sternweis
Paul C. Sternweis The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Clare E. Bryant
Clare E. Bryant University of Cambridge
Maurizio Molinari
Maurizio Molinari Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to various advanced online degrees and career paths within healthcare and life sciences. Many students consider further specialization to enhance their professional opportunities or shift to interdisciplinary roles.

For those interested in clinical leadership without intensive patient interaction, exploring a dnp program without clinical hours can be an appealing option, blending science with healthcare management. If your career vision includes executive roles, the best doctorate of healthcare administration programs can equip you with the skills needed to lead complex health organizations.

For those passionate about pharmaceutical sciences, pursuing pharmd online programs can fast-track your path to becoming a pharmacist, combining biochemistry training with clinical application. Alternatively, if sports medicine or kinesiology interests you, a sports science degree online offers a flexible pathway into the dynamic health and wellness industry.

Choosing the right online program depends on your goals, background, and career aspirations in biology, healthcare, or related sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Iain D. C. Fraser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles