World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
14457
World Ranking
3792
National Ranking
97

Hans de Moel publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans de Moel sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 255 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Hans de Moel D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans de Moel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use

    M.S. Kummu;de H. Moel;M. Porkka;S. Siebert

  • The world’s road to water scarcity: shortage and stress in the 20th century and pathways towards sustainability

    M. Kummu;J. H. A. Guillaume;J. H. A. Guillaume;H. de Moel;S. Eisner

  • Evaluating Flood Resilience Strategies for Coastal Megacities

    Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts;W. J. Wouter Botzen;Kerry Emanuel;Ning Lin

  • Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use

    H. de Moel;J. van Alphen;J. C. J. H. Aerts

  • Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia

    Matti Kummu;Philip J Ward;Hans de Moel;Olli Varis

  • Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates

    H. de Moel;J. C. J. H. Aerts

  • Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales.

    H. De Moel;B. Jongman;H. Kreibich;B. Merz

  • How Close Do We Live to Water? A Global Analysis of Population Distance to Freshwater Bodies

    Matti Kummu;Hans de Moel;Philip J. Ward;Olli Varis

  • Future changes in Mekong River hydrology: impact of climate change and reservoir operation on discharge

    H. Lauri;de H. Moel;P.J. Ward;T.A. Räsänen

  • FLOPROS: an evolving global database of flood protection standards

    Paolo Scussolini;Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts;Brenden Jongman;Laurens M. Bouwer

  • Over the hills and further away from coast: global geospatial patterns of human and environment over the 20th-21st centuries

    Matti Kummu;Hans de Moel;Gianluigi Salvucci;Daniel Viviroli

  • Human impact parameterizations in global hydrological models improve estimates of monthly discharges and hydrological extremes : A multi-model validation study

    T I E Veldkamp;T I E Veldkamp;F Zhao;P J Ward;H de Moel

  • A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate

    H. Kreibich;Ph. Bubeck;M. van Vliet;H. de Moel

  • Generation of a global synthetic tropical cyclone hazard dataset using STORM.

    Nadia Bloemendaal;Ivan D. Haigh;Hans de Moel;Sanne Muis

  • Development of flood exposure in the Netherlands during the 20th and 21st century

    Hans de Moel;Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts;Eric Koomen

  • Integrated Direct and Indirect Flood Risk Modeling: Development and Sensitivity Analysis

    E. E. Koks;M. Bočkarjova;H. de Moel;Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts

  • Adaptive flood risk management planning based on a comprehensive flood risk conceptualisation

    Frans Klijn;Hiedi Kreibich;Hans De Moel;Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell

  • Future flood risk estimates along the river Rhine

    A. H. te Linde;P. Bubeck;J. E. C. Dekkers;H. de Moel

  • Economic damages from Hurricane Sandy attributable to sea level rise caused by anthropogenic climate change

    Benjamin H. Strauss;Philip M. Orton;Klaus Bittermann;Maya K. Buchanan

  • Global-scale benefit-cost analysis of coastal flood adaptation to different flood risk drivers using structural measures

    Timothy Tiggeloven;Hans de Moel;Hessel C. Winsemius;Dirk Eilander

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
W. J. Wouter Botzen
W. J. Wouter Botzen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Philip J. Ward
Philip J. Ward Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Laurens M. Bouwer
Laurens M. Bouwer Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Frank Peeters
Frank Peeters University of Konstanz
Gerald Ganssen
Gerald Ganssen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Richard E. Zeebe
Richard E. Zeebe University of Hawaii at Manoa
Geert-Jan A. Brummer
Geert-Jan A. Brummer Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Dick Kroon
Dick Kroon University of Edinburgh
Simon J A Jung
Simon J A Jung University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up diverse career paths supported by various online degree programs. For students seeking flexible and accessible education options, choosing from one of the easy bachelor degrees can be a great start, especially if balancing work and study.

For a more specialized focus, pursuing a geology degree online enhances understanding of earth processes and environmental impact, crucial for roles in resource management and conservation.

Another vital area linked to Environmental Sciences is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Advanced skills in spatial data analysis can be gained through the top GIS masters programs, allowing graduates to contribute effectively to environmental planning and policy development.

Complementing scientific expertise, leadership and management skills are increasingly valued. Online options like the best online masters in public administration prepare students for influential roles in environmental governance and nonprofit sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Hans de Moel

Recently Published Articles