World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Graham P. Weedon

Graham P. Weedon

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
13269
World Ranking
5144
National Ranking
387

Graham P. Weedon publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham P. Weedon sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 123 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Graham P. Weedon D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham P. Weedon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Graham P. Weedon is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions span multiple fields primarily focused on engineering and environmental science with an emphasis on ocean engineering, global and planetary change, mechanical engineering, atmospheric science, and plant science.

The scientist's work addresses topics such as drilling and well engineering, reservoir engineering and simulation methods, hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, fire effects on ecosystems, hydrology and watershed management studies, and climate variability and models.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative research include David Murray, Carl Richter, Sara Harris, Nicholas J Shackleton, and William B Curry.

Graham P. Weedon has published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Earth system science data
  • Nature Communications
  • Earth-Science Reviews

Recent publications reflect a range of environmental and earth sciences topics:

  • WFDE5: bias-adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies, 2020, Earth system science data
  • The PROFOUND Database for evaluating vegetation models and simulating climate impacts on European forests, 2020, Earth system science data
  • Nocturnal plant respiration is under strong non-temperature control, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Non-flooded riparian Amazon trees are a regionally significant methane source, 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • Problems with the current practice of spectral analysis in cyclostratigraphy: Avoiding false detection of regular cyclicity, 2022, Earth-Science Reviews

Best Publications

  • The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data

    Graham P. Weedon;Gianpaolo Balsamo;Nicolas Bellouin;Sandra Gomes

  • Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models

    C. Piani;G. P. Weedon;M. Best;S. M. Gomes

  • Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and Its Use to Assess Global and Regional Reference Crop Evaporation over Land during the Twentieth Century

    Graham Weedon;S. Gomes;P. Viterbo;William Shuttleworth

  • Forcing mechanisms of the Indian Ocean monsoon

    Steven Clemens;Warren Prell;David Murray;Graham Shimmield

  • Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling

    Hylke E. Beck;Noemi Vergopolan;Ming Pan;Vincenzo Levizzani

  • Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance: Setup and First Results

    Ingjerd Haddeland;Douglas B. Clark;Wietse Franssen;Fulco Ludwig

  • Time-Series Analysis and Cyclostratigraphy: Examining Stratigraphic Records of Environmental Cycles

    Graham P. Weedon

  • Daily evaluation of 26 precipitation datasets using Stage-IV gauge-radar data for the CONUS

    Hylke E. Beck;Ming Pan;Tirthankar Roy;Graham P. Weedon

  • Global river temperatures and sensitivity to atmospheric warming and changes in river flow

    M. T. H. van Vliet;F. Ludwig;J. J. G. Zwolsman;G. P. Weedon

  • WFDE5: bias adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies

    Marco Cucchi;Graham P. Weedon;Alessandro Amici;Nicolas Bellouin

  • Time-Series Analysis and Cyclostratigraphy: Acknowledgements

    Unknown

  • Astronomical calibration of Oligocene-Miocene time

    N. J. Shackleton;S. J. Crowhurst;G. P. Weedon;J. Laskar

  • A global water resources ensemble of hydrological models: The eartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset

    Jaap Schellekens;Emanuel Dutra;Emanuel Dutra;Alberto Martínez-de la Torre;Gianpaolo Balsamo

  • Intensified deep Pacific inflow and ventilation in Pleistocene glacial times.

    Ian Robert Hall;I. Nicholas McCave;Nicholas J. Shackleton;Graham P. Weedon

  • LS3MIP (v1.0) Contribution to CMIP6: The Land Surface, Snow and Soil Moisture Model Intercomparison Project Aims, Setup and Expected Outcome.

    Bart Van Den Hurk;Hyungjun Kim;Gerhard Krinner;Sonia I. Seneviratne

  • Astronomical calibration of the Jurassic time-scale from cyclostratigraphy in British mudrock formations

    Graham P. Weedon;Hugh C. Jenkyns;Angela L. Coe;Stephen P. Hesselbo

  • Relationships between phenology, radiation and precipitation in the Amazon region

    Andrew V. Bradley;Nicolas Barbier;Graham P. Weedon

  • Integrated stratigraphy of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation (Upper Jurassic) based on exposures and boreholes in south Dorset, UK

    Helen S. Morgans-Bell;Angela L. Coe;Stephen P. Hesselbo;Hugh C. Jenkyns

  • Hemipelagic shelf sedimentation and climatic cycles: the basal Jurassic (Blue Lias) of South Britain

    G.P. Weedon

  • Evaluation of a photosynthesis-based biogenic isoprene emission scheme in JULES and simulation of isoprene emissions under present-day climate conditions

    F. Pacifico;F. Pacifico;F. Pacifico;S. P. Harrison;S. P. Harrison;C. D. Jones;Almut Arneth

  • Evaluating the JULES Land Surface Model Energy Fluxes Using FLUXNET Data

    Eleanor Blyth;John Gash;Amanda Lloyd;Matthew Pryor

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh C. Jenkyns
Hugh C. Jenkyns University of Oxford
Stefan Hagemann
Stefan Hagemann Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Justin Sheffield
Justin Sheffield University of Southampton
Hylke E. Beck
Hylke E. Beck King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Nicholas J Shackleton
Nicholas J Shackleton University of Cambridge
Albert van Dijk
Albert van Dijk Australian National University
George J. Huffman
George J. Huffman Goddard Space Flight Center
Ming Pan
Ming Pan Princeton University
Chris Huntingford
Chris Huntingford Natural Environment Research Council
Fulco Ludwig
Fulco Ludwig Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and deepen expertise. An online geoscience degree equips students with essential knowledge of Earth processes, which is crucial for tackling environmental challenges like climate change and resource management.

Geospatial technology continues to grow in importance, making programs such as the best GIS programs in the US an excellent choice. GIS skills enable professionals to analyze and visualize environmental data, supporting decision-making in conservation, urban planning, and disaster response.

Leadership and policy skills are also vital in the environmental field. Many find that completing one of the best online masters in public administration programs strengthens their ability to influence environmental policy and manage public resources effectively.

Additionally, understanding societal impacts and human behavior plays a significant role. An accredited online bachelors in sociology provides insight into community dynamics, which is essential for environmental justice and sustainable development initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Graham P. Weedon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles