World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
59
Citations
13232
World Ranking
3421
National Ranking
1589

George Garratty publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Garratty sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 274 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

George Garratty D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Garratty sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

George Garratty was affiliated with the American Red Cross in the United States during their career. Their professional background was connected to this organization, which is known for its work in health and humanitarian services.

There is no available record of specific papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications related to George Garratty. Additionally, no detailed information exists regarding their main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics.

No awards or honors have been documented in the accessible information about George Garratty.

Due to the absence of detailed publication data, it is not possible to outline specific contributions or areas of expertise. The lack of information on co-authors or frequent venues suggests that their published work might not be widely recorded in accessible databases.

George Garratty is deceased. The profile is presented in past tense reflecting their completed career.

Best Publications

  • Antibody against poly(ethylene glycol) adversely affects PEG-asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.

    Jonathan K. Armstrong;Georg Hempel;Susanne Koling;Linda S. Chan

  • Antibodies against polyethylene glycol in healthy subjects and in patients treated with PEG-conjugated agents.

    Ricardo P Garay;Raafat El-Gewely;Jonathan K Armstrong;George Garratty

  • International Society of Blood Transfusion Committee on Terminology for Red Blood Cell Surface Antigens: Macao report

    G. Daniels;L. Castilho;W. A. Flegel;A. Fletcher

  • Immune hemolytic anemia associated with drug therapy.

    George Garratty

  • Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia

    George Garratty;Lawrence D. Petz

  • Acquired immune hemolytic anemias

    Lawrence D Petz;George Garratty

  • Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia.

    George Garratty

  • Immune Hemolytic Anemias

    Lawrence D. Petz;George Garratty

  • Blood group terminology 2004: from the International Society of Blood Transfusion committee on terminology for red cell surface antigens.

    G. L. Daniels;A. Fletcher;G. Garratty;S. Henry

  • The changing spectrum of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia

    Patricia A. Arndt;George Garratty

  • Respiratory and Urinary Tract Infections, Arthritis, and Asthma Associated with HTLV-I and HTLV-II Infection

    Edward L. Murphy;Baoguang Wang;Ronald A. Sacher;Joy Fridey

  • Selecting donors of platelets for refractory patients on the basis of HLA antibody specificity.

    Lawrence D. Petz;George Garratty;Loni Calhoun;Bill D. Clark

  • First-time blood donors: demographic trends

    Ying Wu;Simone A. Glynn;George B. Schreiber;David J. Wright

  • Immune hemolytic anemia associated with negative routine serology.

    George Garratty

  • Immune hemolytic anemia caused by drugs

    George Garratty

  • A retrospective analysis of the value of monocyte monolayer assay results for predicting the clinical significance of blood group alloantibodies

    Patricia A. Arndt;George Garratty

  • International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on red cell immunogenetics and blood group terminology: Cancun report (2012).

    Jill Storry;L Castilho;G Daniels;W A Flegel

  • Terminology for blood group antigens and genes—historical origins and guidelines in the new millennium

    G. Garratty;W. Dzik;P.D. Issitt;D.M. Lublin

  • Serology of antibodies to second‐ and third‐generation cephalosporins associated with immune hemolytic anemia and/or positive direct antiglobulin tests

    P.A. Arndt;R.M. Leger;G. Garratty

  • International Society of Blood Transfusion Committee on Terminology for Red Cell Surface Antigens: Cape Town report

    G. Daniels;W. A. Flegel;A. Fletcher;G. Garratty

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward L. Murphy
Edward L. Murphy University of California, San Francisco
James W. Smith
James W. Smith McMaster University
George B. Schreiber
George B. Schreiber Westat (United States)
Geoff Daniels
Geoff Daniels NHS Blood and Transplant
Pertti Sistonen
Pertti Sistonen Finnish Red Cross
Willy A. Flegel
Willy A. Flegel National Institutes of Health
Martin L. Olsson
Martin L. Olsson Lund University
Steven Kleinman
Steven Kleinman University of British Columbia
Kenneth I. Weinberg
Kenneth I. Weinberg Stanford University
Jeffrey McCullough
Jeffrey McCullough University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Immunology in the USA opens doors to various advanced healthcare opportunities, especially in nursing and clinical practice. Many professionals seek to complement their immunology knowledge with targeted nursing programs to enhance their career prospects.

For those already qualified as Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs), enrolling in an fnp to acnp bridge program online can provide the specialized skills needed to transition into acute care nursing roles. These programs are designed with flexibility in mind, perfect for working professionals.

Accelerated study options also exist for those looking to become nurse practitioners swiftly. Comprehensive options like the nurse practitioner accelerated program offer a fast-track yet thorough pathway into advanced nursing roles with a focus on patient care and medical expertise.

For individuals without a nursing background, several programs allow a rapid transition into nursing careers. The popular 12-month accelerated nursing programs online for non nurses provide a condensed curriculum ideal for career changers.

Additionally, the accelerated bsn programs for non nurses offer accessible entry points into the nursing profession, making it easier for students with diverse educational backgrounds to acquire essential nursing qualifications while integrating immunology studies.

Best Scientists Citing George Garratty

Recently Published Articles