World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
11978
World Ranking
12032
National Ranking
928

Geoff Daniels publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoff Daniels sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 279 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Geoff Daniels D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoff Daniels sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoff Daniels is affiliated with NHS Blood and Transplant in the United Kingdom and specializes in medical research with a focus on hematology and related fields. Their work encompasses several subfields such as pediatrics, perinatology, child health, genetics, physiology, and infectious diseases, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within medicine.

Their research topics cover a range of areas including blood groups and transfusion, hemoglobinopathies and related disorders, prenatal screening and diagnostics, neonatal health and biochemistry, adenosine and purinergic signaling, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, as well as adolescent sexual and reproductive health.

Recent publications by Geoff Daniels include:

  • An overview of blood group genotyping, 2021, Annals of Blood
  • Augustine Blood Group System and Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1, 2021, Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy
  • Professor David J. Anstee (1946-2021), 2021, Immunohematology

Aside from these, Daniels has also contributed as a co-author in interdisciplinary contexts such as HIV testing and awareness in rural African American communities, demonstrating engagement with public health research.

The venues that frequently publish their work include:

  • Annals of Blood
  • Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy
  • Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
  • Immunohematology
  • Contraception

Geoff Daniels has collaborated with several other researchers, including Jenni M. Wise, Mirjam C. Kempf, Cordula Ott, Alison Footman, and Claire Hardy, indicating a networked research presence within their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Human blood groups

    Geoff Daniels

  • The presence of an RHD pseudogene containing a 37 base pair duplication and a nonsense mutation in Africans with the Rh D-negative blood group phenotype

    Belinda K. Singleton;Carole A. Green;Neil D. Avent;Peter G. Martin

  • International Society of Blood Transfusion Committee on Terminology for Red Blood Cell Surface Antigens: Macao report

    G. Daniels;L. Castilho;W. A. Flegel;A. Fletcher

  • Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study

    Kirstin Finning;Pete Martin;Joanna Summers;Edwin Massey

  • CD151, the first member of the tetraspanin (TM4) superfamily detected on erythrocytes, is essential for the correct assembly of human basement membranes in kidney and skin

    Vanja Karamatic Crew;Nicholas Burton;Alexander Kagan;Carole A. Green

  • The molecular genetics of blood group polymorphism

    Geoff Daniels

  • Blood group antibodies and their significance in transfusion medicine.

    Joyce Poole;Geoff Daniels

  • McLeod neuroacanthocytosis: genotype and phenotype.

    Adrian Danek;Justin P. Rubio;Luca Rampoldi;Mengfatt Ho

  • Blood group terminology 2004: from the International Society of Blood Transfusion committee on terminology for red cell surface antigens.

    G. L. Daniels;A. Fletcher;G. Garratty;S. Henry

  • Variants of RhD--current testing and clinical consequences.

    Geoff Daniels

  • The VS and V blood group polymorphisms in Africans: a serologic and molecular analysis

    G. L. Daniels;B. H. W. Faas;C. A. Green;E. Smart

  • Non-invasive prenatal determination of fetal sex: translating research into clinical practice

    M Hill;K Finning;P Martin;J Hogg

  • RHD sequencing: a new tool for decision making on transfusion therapy and provision of Rh prophylaxis

    T J Legler;J H Maas;M Köhler;T Wagner

  • A Clinical Service in the UK to Predict Fetal Rh (Rhesus) D Blood Group Using Free Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma

    Kirstin Finning;Peter Martin;Geoff Daniels

  • Chorein detection for the diagnosis of chorea-acanthocytosis

    Carol Dobson-Stone;Antonio Velayos-Baeza;Lea A Filippone;Sarah K Westbury

  • The majority of the in vitro erythroid expansion potential resides in CD34− cells, outweighing the contribution of CD34+ cells and significantly increasing the erythroblast yield from peripheral blood samples

    Emile van den Akker;Timothy J. Satchwell;Stephanie Pellegrin;Geoff Daniels

  • Fetal genotyping for the K (Kell) and Rh C, c, and E blood groups on cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma.

    Kirstin Finning;Peter Martin;Joanna Summers;Geoff Daniels

  • Altered expression and allelic association of the hypervariable membrane mucin MUC1 in Helicobacter pylori gastritis.

    Lynne E. Vinall;Marie King;Marco Novelli;Carole A. Green

  • Individuals lacking the Gerbich blood-group antigen have alterations in the human erythrocyte membrane sialoglycoproteins beta and gamma.

    D J Anstee;K Ridgwell;M J A Tanner;G L Daniels

  • Blood Group Terminology 1995: ISBT Working Party on Terminology for Red Cell Surface Antigens

    G. L. Daniels;D. J. Anstee;J. P. Cartron;W. Dahr

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Anstee
David J. Anstee University of Bristol
Martin L. Olsson
Martin L. Olsson Lund University
Pertti Sistonen
Pertti Sistonen Finnish Red Cross
Willy A. Flegel
Willy A. Flegel National Institutes of Health
George Garratty
George Garratty American Red Cross
Lyn S. Chitty
Lyn S. Chitty University College London
Marion E. Reid
Marion E. Reid New York Blood Center
Marie-Anne Shaw
Marie-Anne Shaw University of Leeds
Anthony P. Monaco
Anthony P. Monaco Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education and career options related to Biology and Biochemistry can open up a range of specialized opportunities in the healthcare industry. For those looking to complement their science background with business skills, pursuing the cheapest online MBA in healthcare management can be a cost-effective way to qualify for leadership roles in hospitals, research institutions, or biotechnology companies.

Many graduates also consider careers in medical billing and coding. It's important to understand the key differences between certification paths, such as ccs vs cpc certification, as each provides unique advantages and salary prospects within the healthcare workforce.

For those interested in salary expectations, learn what a certified medical coder salary typically looks like and what training is required. Before making the leap, it's wise to consider the is medical billing and coding worth it discussion to weigh the pros and cons of the profession. This helps ensure you choose the pathway best aligned to your interests and long-term goals.

Best Scientists Citing Geoff Daniels

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles