World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael J. A. Tanner

Michael J. A. Tanner

Michael J. A. Tanner publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. A. Tanner sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Michael J. A. Tanner D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. A. Tanner sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. A. Tanner is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly spans the field of medicine with a focus on oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, cancer research, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics related to cancer treatment and research including breast cancer treatment studies, cancer treatment and pharmacology, prostate cancer treatment and research, radiopharmaceutical chemistry and applications, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, CAR-T cell therapy research, and lung cancer treatments and mutations.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Michael J. A. Tanner include Karim Fizazi, Alice Bernard-Tessier, Chris Garratt, Tarja Ikonen, and Pasi Pohjanjousi.

Michael J. A. Tanner has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Annals of Internal Medicine (12 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 publications)
  • Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (1 publication)
  • NEJM Evidence (1 publication)
  • Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy (1 publication)

Recent papers authored by or involving Michael J. A. Tanner include:

  • Widespread Implementation of a Low-Cost Telehealth Service in the Delivery of Antenatal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis, 2022, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
  • Targeted Inhibition of CYP11A1 in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, 2023, NEJM Evidence
  • First-in-human phase 1 study of budigalimab, an anti-PD-1 inhibitor, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, 2021, Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy
  • Triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers found by mammography screening show excellent prognosis, 2021, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Model Informed Dosing Regimen and Phase I Results of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Budigalimab (ABBV-181), 2020, Clinical and Translational Science

Best Publications

  • Familial distal renal tubular acidosis is associated with mutations in the red cell anion exchanger (Band 3, AE1) gene

    L. J. Bruce;D. L. Cope;G. K. Jones;A. E. Schofield

  • A band 3-based macrocomplex of integral and peripheral proteins in the RBC membrane

    Lesley J Bruce;Roland Beckmann;M Leticia Ribeiro;Luanne L Peters

  • The complete amino acid sequence of the human erythrocyte membrane anion-transport protein deduced from the cDNA sequence.

    M J A Tanner;P G Martin;S High

  • cDNA cloning of a 30 kDa erythrocyte membrane protein associated with Rh (Rhesus)-blood-group-antigen expression.

    N D Avent;K Ridgwell;M J A Tanner;D J Anstee

  • Mutations in the chloride-bicarbonate exchanger gene AE1 cause autosomal dominant but not autosomal recessive distal renal tubular acidosis

    F. E. Karet;F. J. Gainza;A. Z. Györy;R. J. Unwin

  • The structure and function of band 3 (AE1): Recent developments (Review)

    Michael J. A. Tanner

  • The expression of human blood group antigens during erythropoiesis in a cell culture system.

    Mark J.G. Southcott;Michael J.A. Tanner;David J. Anstee

  • Defective anion transport activity of the abnormal band 3 in hereditary ovalocytic red blood cells.

    Ann E. Schofield;David M. Reardon;Michael J. A. Tanner

  • Use of a novel rapid preparation of fat-cell plasma membranes employing Percoll to investigate the effects of insulin and adrenaline on membrane protein phosphorylation within intact fat-cells.

    Graham Belsham;Richard M. Denton;Michael J. A. Tanner

  • Band 3 mutations, renal tubular acidosis and South-East Asian ovalocytosis in Malaysia and Papua New Guinea: loss of up to 95% band 3 transport in red cells.

    Lesley J. Bruce;Oliver Wrong;Ashley M. Toye;Mark T. Young

  • Isolation and characterization of CD47 glycoprotein: a multispanning membrane protein which is the same as integrin-associated protein (IAP) and the ovarian tumour marker OA3

    W J Mawby;C H Holmes;D J Anstee;F A Spring

  • Separation and some properties of the major proteins of the human erythrocyte membrane

    M. J. A. Tanner;D. H. Boxer

  • The Expression of Human Blood Group Antigens During Erythropoiesis in a Cell Culture System: Presented in part as an abstract at the 39th American Society of Hematology Meeting, December 5-9, 1997 (Blood 90:175b, 1997 [abstr, suppl 1, part 2]).

    Mark J.G. Southcott;Michael J.A. Tanner;David J. Anstee

  • Erythrocyte detergent-resistant membrane proteins: Their characterization and selective uptake during malarial infection

    Sean C. Murphy;Benjamin U. Samuel;Travis Harrison;Kaye D. Speicher

  • Human BTR1, a new bicarbonate transporter superfamily member and human AE4 from kidney.

    Mark D. Parker;Elizabeth P. Ourmozdi;Michael J.A. Tanner

  • Changes in the blood group Wright antigens are associated with a mutation at amino acid 658 in human erythrocyte band 3: a site of interaction between band 3 and glycophorin A under certain conditions.

    Lesley J. Bruce;Susan M. Ring;David J. Anstee;Marion E. Reid

  • The membrane change in En(a-) human erythrocytes. Absence of the major erythrocyte sialoglycoprotein.

    M J A Tanner;D J Anstee

  • Identification and partial characterization of the human erythrocyte membrane component(s) that express the antigens of the LW blood-group system

    G Mallinson;P G Martin;D J Anstee;M J A Tanner

  • Preferential expression of the complement regulatory protein decay accelerating factor at the fetomaternal interface during human pregnancy.

    C H Holmes;K L Simpson;S D Wainwright;C G Tate

  • Absence of CD47 in protein 4.2-deficient hereditary spherocytosis in man: an interaction between the Rh complex and the band 3 complex

    Lesley J. Bruce;Sandip Ghosh;May Jean King;D. Mark Layton

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Anstee
David J. Anstee University of Bristol
Susan M. Ring
Susan M. Ring University of Bristol
Narla Mohandas
Narla Mohandas New York Blood Center
Stephen High
Stephen High University of Manchester
Christopher G. Tate
Christopher G. Tate MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Marion E. Reid
Marion E. Reid New York Blood Center
Luanne L. Peters
Luanne L. Peters The Jackson Laboratory
Philip S. Low
Philip S. Low Purdue University West Lafayette
Ben Roelofsen
Ben Roelofsen Utrecht University
Geoff Daniels
Geoff Daniels NHS Blood and Transplant

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to diverse careers beyond traditional lab roles. One growing field is health information management and medical coding, both of which are accessible through online learning. Understanding the differences between medical coding certification options, such as CPC vs. CCS, is important for graduates considering non-clinical healthcare jobs.

For those interested in job prospects and earning potential, it helps to know how much does a medical coder make. This role offers competitive salaries and flexibility, making it appealing to science graduates with analytical skills.

The medical billing and coding job outlook remains strong due to the increasing need for accurate digital health records. Many pursue this pathway by enrolling in a him degree program, often available online and suitable for students with a background in life sciences.

Exploring these options can expand career possibilities for Biology and Biochemistry graduates seeking flexible and in-demand roles in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. A. Tanner

Recently Published Articles