World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick M. Burkle

Frederick M. Burkle

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
55
Citations
10061
World Ranking
2052
National Ranking
983

Frederick M. Burkle publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick M. Burkle sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 345 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Frederick M. Burkle D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick M. Burkle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Frederick M. Burkle is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to fields related to health professions and medicine. Their academic output spans 83 publications in health professions and 49 in medicine, with specific focus on areas such as general health professions, emergency medical services, sociology and political science, emergency medicine, and infectious diseases.

Their research addresses a range of topics primarily centered on disaster response and management, health and conflict studies, disaster management and resilience, viral infections and outbreaks research, trauma and emergency care studies, public health policies and education, and climate change and health impacts.

Among recent academic contributions, notable papers include:

  • "Current Response and Management Decisions of the European Union to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Review" (2020, Sustainability)
  • "Estimating the Number of Civilian Casualties in Modern Armed Conflicts-A Systematic Review" (2021, Frontiers in Public Health)
  • "Cohort research analysis of disaster experience, preparedness, and competency-based training among nurses" (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • "Declining Public Health Protections within Autocratic Regimes: Impact on Global Public Health Security, Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics" (2020, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine)
  • "Review of Military Casualties in Modern Conflicts-The Re-emergence of Casualties From Armored Warfare" (2021, Military Medicine)

Frederick M. Burkle has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Krzysztof Goniewicz
  • Amir Khorram-Manesh
  • Attila J. Hertelendy
  • Mariusz Goniewicz
  • Eric Carlström

Their publications commonly appear in venues such as Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Sustainability, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Their scientific work has been formally recognized by induction as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2007.

Best Publications

  • Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic

    Michael D. Christian;Laura Hawryluck;Laura Hawryluck;Randy S. Wax;Tim Cook

  • Prevalence of mental disorders among children exposed to war: a systematic review of 7,920 children.

    Vindya Attanayake;Rachel McKay;Michel Joffres;Sonal Singh

  • A consensus-based educational framework and competency set for the discipline of disaster medicine and public health preparedness.

    Italo Subbarao;James M. Lyznicki;Edbert B. Hsu;Kristine M. Gebbie

  • Current response and management decisions of the European Union to the COVID-19 outbreak: A review

    Krzysztof Goniewicz;Amir Khorram-Manesh;Attila J. Hertelendy;Mariusz Goniewicz

  • The effectiveness of psychological first aid as a disaster intervention tool: research analysis of peer-reviewed literature from 1990-2010.

    Jeffrey H. Fox;Frederick M. Burkle;Judith Bass;Francesco A. Pia

  • Population-based triage management in response to surge-capacity requirements during a large-scale bioevent disaster.

    Frederick M. Burkle;Frederick M. Burkle

  • Mass casualty management of a large-scale bioterrorist event: an epidemiological approach that shapes triage decisions.

    Frederick M. Burkle

  • Consensus statements regarding the multidisciplinary care of limb amputation patients in disasters or humanitarian emergencies: report of the 2011 Humanitarian Action Summit Surgical Working Group on amputations following disasters or conflict.

    Lisa Marie Knowlton;James E. Gosney;Smita Chackungal;Eric Altschuler

  • Lessons learnt and future expectations of complex emergencies.

    Frederick M Burkle

  • Impact of public health emergencies on modern disaster taxonomy, planning, and response.

    Frederick M. Burkle;P. Gregg Greenough

  • Core Competencies in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance: A Systematic Review.

    Alba Ripoll Gallardo;Ahmadreza Djalali;Marco Foletti;Luca Ragazzoni

  • Excess mortality in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: a preliminary report

    Kevin U. Stephens;David Grew;Karen Chin;Paul Kadetz

  • Education and Training Initiatives for Crisis Management in the European Union: A Web-based Analysis of Available Programs

    Pier Luigi Ingrassia;Marco Foletti;Ahmadreza Djalali;Piercarlo Scarone

  • Militaries and global health: peace, conflict, and disaster response

    Joshua Michaud;Joshua Michaud;Kellie Moss;Derek Licina;Ron Waldman

  • Three decades of disasters: a review of disaster-specific literature from 1977-2009.

    Erin Smith;Jason Wasiak;Ayan Sen;Frank Archer

  • Acute-Phase Mental Health Consequences of Disasters: Implications for Triage and Emergency Medical Services

    Frederick M Burkle

  • Evolving need for alternative triage management in public health emergencies: a Hurricane Katrina case study.

    Kelly R. Klein;Paul E. Pepe;Frederick M. Burkle;Nanci E. Nagel

  • Human stampedes: a systematic review of historical and peer-reviewed sources.

    Ka Ming Ngai;Frederick M. Burkle;Anthony Hsu;Edbert B. Hsu

  • Pediatric trauma at tertiary-level hospitals in the aftermath of the Bam, Iran Earthquake.

    Marzieh Sabzehchian;Hassan Abolghasemi;Mohammad Hadi Radfar;Nematollah Jonaidi-Jafari

  • Medical Rehabilitation in Natural Disasters: A Review

    Fary Khan;Bhasker Amatya;James Gosney;Farooq A. Rathore

  • Future Humanitarian Crises: Challenges for Practice, Policy, and Public Health

    Frederick M. Burkle

  • Case conferenceBorderline personality disorder

    Frederick M Burkle;Ronald Rae;Matthew M Rice

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard C. Franklin
Richard C. Franklin James Cook University
Peter A. Leggat
Peter A. Leggat James Cook University
Niranjan Kissoon
Niranjan Kissoon University of British Columbia
Edward J. Mills
Edward J. Mills McMaster University
Kristine M. Gebbie
Kristine M. Gebbie Flinders University
Richard Speare
Richard Speare James Cook University
Gilbert Burnham
Gilbert Burnham Johns Hopkins University
Heath Kelly
Heath Kelly Australian National University
Carol S. North
Carol S. North The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Judith K. Bass
Judith K. Bass Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to fulfilling careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Many students seek programs that combine quality education with affordability and flexible learning options.

If you're interested in helping individuals through mental health and emotional challenges, consider cacrep-accredited counseling programs. These programs meet established professional standards and are often required for licensure. Another closely related path is marriage and family therapy; review these mft programs to find affordable online options that prepare you for this rewarding field.

Those with a broader interest in human behavior may want to look into the cheapest psychology degree online, which covers foundational concepts and opens versatility in career choices. If your goal is to support communities through advocacy and direct social services, seek out the masters in social work that align with your academic background.

Each of these degrees offers a unique way to make a positive social impact, and online study options make them more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick M. Burkle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles