World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
9795
World Ranking
7290
National Ranking
2597

Ethan Gutmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ethan Gutmann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ethan Gutmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ethan Gutmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ethan Gutmann is affiliated with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong emphasis on Atmospheric Science and related subfields.

Their work extensively covers topics including:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Hydrology and watershed management studies
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Plant water relations and carbon dynamics
  • Flood risk assessment and management

Ethan Gutmann has contributed to various publication venues where they have frequently published, such as:

  • Journal of Hydrometeorology
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • The Cryosphere
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ethan Gutmann include:

  • J. R. Arnold
  • Andrew J. Newman
  • Jessica D. Lundquist
  • Andrew W. Wood
  • Bert Kruyt

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Ethan Gutmann include:

  • Snow depth mapping from stereo satellite imagery in mountainous terrain: evaluation using airborne laser-scanning data (2020), The Cryosphere
  • Snow Ensemble Uncertainty Project (SEUP): quantification of snow water equivalent uncertainty across North America via ensemble land surface modeling (2021), The Cryosphere
  • Snowfall and snowpack in the Western U.S. as captured by convection permitting climate simulations: current climate and pseudo global warming future climate (2021), Climate Dynamics
  • Projected Climate Change Impacts on Hurricane Storm Surge Inundation in the Coastal United States (2020), Frontiers in Built Environment
  • Snow interception modelling: Isolated observations have led to many land surface models lacking appropriate temperature sensitivities (2021), Hydrological Processes

Best Publications

  • How Well Are We Measuring Snow: The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed

    Roy Rasmussen;Bruce Baker;John Kochendorfer;Tilden Meyers

  • Continental-scale convection-permitting modeling of the current and future climate of North America

    Changhai Liu;Kyoko Ikeda;Roy Rasmussen;Mike Barlage

  • High resolution coupled climate-runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: A process study of current and warmer climate

    Roy Rasmussen;Changhai Liu;Kyoko Ikeda;David Gochis

  • Use of GPS receivers as a soil moisture network for water cycle studies

    Kristine M. Larson;Eric E. Small;Ethan D. Gutmann;Andria L. Bilich

  • A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept

    Martyn P. Clark;Bart Nijssen;Jessica D. Lundquist;Dmitri Kavetski

  • Can we measure snow depth with GPS receivers

    Kristine M. Larson;Ethan D. Gutmann;Valery U. Zavorotny;John J. Braun

  • Using GPS multipath to measure soil moisture fluctuations: initial results

    Kristine M. Larson;Eric E. Small;Ethan Gutmann;Andria Bilich

  • GPS Multipath and Its Relation to Near-Surface Soil Moisture Content

    K.M. Larson;J.J. Braun;E.E. Small;V.U. Zavorotny

  • Our Skill in Modeling Mountain Rain and Snow is Bypassing the Skill of Our Observational Networks

    Jessica Lundquist;Mimi Hughes;Ethan Gutmann;Sarah Kapnick

  • Cascading impacts of bark beetle‐caused tree mortality on coupled biogeophysical and biogeochemical processes

    Steven L. Edburg;Jeffrey A. Hicke;Paul D. Brooks;Elise G. Pendall

  • Characterizing Uncertainty of the Hydrologic Impacts of Climate Change

    Martyn P. Clark;Robert L. Wilby;Ethan D. Gutmann;Julie A. Vano

  • A Physical Model for GPS Multipath Caused by Land Reflections: Toward Bare Soil Moisture Retrievals

    V.U. Zavorotny;K.M. Larson;J.J. Braun;E.E. Small

  • A Comparison of Statistical and Dynamical Downscaling of Winter Precipitation over Complex Terrain

    Ethan D. Gutmann;Roy M. Rasmussen;Changhai Liu;Kyoko Ikeda

  • Climate Change Impacts on the Water Balance of the Colorado Headwaters: High-Resolution Regional Climate Model Simulations

    Roy Rasmussen;Kyoko Ikeda;Changhai Liu;David Gochis

  • A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies

    Martyn P. Clark;Bart Nijssen;Jessica D. Lundquist;Dmitri Kavetski

  • Towards seamless large-domain parameter estimation for hydrologic models

    Naoki Mizukami;Martyn P. Clark;Andrew J. Newman;Andrew W. Wood

  • An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States

    Ethan Gutmann;Tom Pruitt;Martyn P. Clark;Levi Brekke

  • Gridded Ensemble Precipitation and Temperature Estimates for the Contiguous United States

    Andrew J. Newman;Martyn P. Clark;Jason Craig;Bart Nijssen

  • Changes in Hurricanes from a 13-Yr Convection-Permitting Pseudo–Global Warming Simulation

    Ethan D. Gutmann;Roy M. Rasmussen;Changhai Liu;Kyoko Ikeda

  • Effects of Hydrologic Model Choice and Calibration on the Portrayal of Climate Change Impacts

    Pablo A. Mendoza;Martyn P. Clark;Naoki Mizukami;Andrew J. Newman

  • ESD Reviews: Model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing

    Gab Abramowitz;Nadja Herger;Ethan Gutmann;Dorit Hammerling

Frequent Co-Authors

Martyn P. Clark
Martyn P. Clark University of Saskatchewan
Roy Rasmussen
Roy Rasmussen National Center for Atmospheric Research
Andrew W. Wood
Andrew W. Wood National Center for Atmospheric Research
Eric E. Small
Eric E. Small University of Colorado Boulder
Kyoko Ikeda
Kyoko Ikeda National Center for Atmospheric Research
David Gochis
David Gochis National Center for Atmospheric Research
Bart Nijssen
Bart Nijssen University of Washington
Jimy Dudhia
Jimy Dudhia National Center for Atmospheric Research
Jessica D. Lundquist
Jessica D. Lundquist University of Washington
Balaji Rajagopalan
Balaji Rajagopalan University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens the door to various related fields that complement and expand your knowledge. For students looking for affordable options, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can be a practical choice to maintain flexibility and reduce costs.

If you’re considering the ease of completing your degree alongside other commitments, exploring what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get could help you find programs well-suited for balancing workload and career readiness.

Specialized disciplines such as geology, essential for understanding Earth's processes, are also offered as quality distance learning options. Many students benefit from pursuing an online geology degree to gain in-depth scientific knowledge while studying remotely.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) degrees play a crucial role in environmental data analysis and mapping. Exploring the best GIS undergraduate programs online can equip you with high-demand technical skills to boost your career prospects in environmental science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ethan Gutmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles