World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
43
Citations
6308
World Ranking
3283
National Ranking
232

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
43
Citations
6423
World Ranking
5355
National Ranking
433

Elizabeth A. Pinkard publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Pinkard sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 97 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Elizabeth A. Pinkard D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Pinkard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth A. Pinkard was affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focused on environmental science, with particular attention to nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, ecology, and atmospheric science.

Their work involved several main topics, including forest ecology and management, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, hydrology and sediment transport processes, tree-ring climate responses, rangeland and wildlife management, and seedling growth and survival studies.

Pinkard published research across various scientific venues, including:

  • Trees
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Ecological Management & Restoration
  • Open Access Repository (University of Tasmania)

Some of their recent papers included:

  • "Can crown variables increase the generality of individual tree biomass equations?" (2020) in Trees
  • "Flooding constrains tree water use of a riparian forest in the lower Heihe River Basin, Northwest China" (2020) in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Investigating constraints on direct seeding for native revegetation in the Tasmanian Midlands" (2021) in Ecological Management & Restoration
  • "Photosynthesis and resource allocation in the crowns of Eucalyptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden following green pruning" (2023) in Open Access Repository (University of Tasmania)

Frequent coauthors who collaborated with Pinkard included David I. Forrester, I. Dumbrell, Stephen Elms, Keryn I. Paul, and Stephen H. Roxburgh.

Best Publications

  • A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality

    Henry D. Adams;Melanie J.B. Zeppel;Melanie J.B. Zeppel;William R.L. Anderegg;Henrik Hartmann

  • Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality.

    Patrick J. Mitchell;Anthony P. O'Grady;David T. Tissue;Donald A. White

  • Non-structural carbohydrates in woody plants compared among laboratories.

    Audrey G. Quentin;Audrey G. Quentin;Elizabeth A. Pinkard;Michael G. Ryan;Michael G. Ryan;David T. Tissue

  • Testing the generality of above-ground biomass allometry across plant functional types at the continent scale

    Keryn I. Paul;Stephen H. Roxburgh;Jerome Chave;Jacqueline R. England

  • Tree size and climatic water deficit control root to shoot ratio in individual trees globally.

    Alicia Ledo;Keryn I. Paul;David F. R. P. Burslem;John J. Ewel

  • Shifts in biomass and resource allocation patterns following defoliation in Eucalyptus globulus growing with varying water and nutrient supplies

    Alieta Eyles;Elizabeth A Pinkard;Caroline Mohammed;Caroline Mohammed;Caroline Mohammed

  • Co-ordination of growth, gas exchange and hydraulics define the carbon safety margin in tree species with contrasting drought strategies.

    P.J. Mitchell;A.P. O'Grady;D.T. Tissue;D. Worledge

  • Effects of green pruning on growth and stem shape of Eucalyptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden.

    E. A. Pinkard;E. A. Pinkard;C. L. Beadle;C. L. Beadle

  • Chlorophyll and nitrogen determination for plantation-grown Eucalyptus nitens and E. globulus using a non-destructive meter

    EA Pinkard;EA Pinkard;VS Patel;VS Patel;CL Mohammed;CL Mohammed

  • Exposure of trees to drought-induced die-off is defined by a common climatic threshold across different vegetation types.

    Patrick J. Mitchell;Anthony P. O'Grady;Keith R. Hayes;Elizabeth A. Pinkard

  • Crown and stand characteristics of Eucalyptus nitens in response to initial spacing: implications for thinning

    E.A Pinkard;W.A Neilsen

  • Modeling the effect of physiological responses to green pruning on net biomass production of Eucalyptus nitens.

    E. A. Pinkard;M. Battaglia;M. Battaglia;C. L. Beadle;C. L. Beadle;P. J. Sands;P. J. Sands

  • Native forests and climate change: Lessons from eucalypts

    T.H. Booth;L.M. Broadhurst;E. Pinkard;S.M. Prober

  • An ecoclimatic framework for evaluating the resilience of vegetation to water deficit.

    Patrick J Mitchell;Anthony P O'Grady;Elizabeth A Pinkard;Tim J Brodribb

  • Aboveground biomass partitioning and crown architecture of Eucalyptus nitens following green pruning

    E A Pinkard;C L Beadle

  • Defoliation and nitrogen effects on photosynthesis and growth of Eucalyptus globulus.

    Elizabeth A Pinkard;Michael Battaglia;Caroline L Mohammed

  • Effects of pattern and severity of pruning on growth and branch development of pre-canopy closure Eucalyptus nitens

    E.A Pinkard

  • Photosynthetic responses of Eucalyptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden to green pruning

    E. A. Pinkard;C. L. Beadle;N. J. Davidson;M. Battaglia

  • Physiological and growth responses related to pattern and severity of green pruning in young Eucalyptus globulus

    E.A. Pinkard

  • Climate adaptation in Australia’s resource-extraction industries: ready or not?

    Jane H. Hodgkinson;Alistair J. Hobday;Elizabeth A. Pinkard

  • Photosynthetic responses of

    E. A. Pinkard;C. L. Beadle;N. J. Davidson;M. Battaglia

Frequent Co-Authors

Caroline Mohammed
Caroline Mohammed University of Tasmania
Christopher L. Beadle
Christopher L. Beadle University of Tasmania
Anthony P. O'Grady
Anthony P. O'Grady Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Michael Battaglia
Michael Battaglia Agriculture and Food
Alieta Eyles
Alieta Eyles University of Tasmania
Tim Wardlaw
Tim Wardlaw Forestry Tasmania
David T. Tissue
David T. Tissue Western Sydney University
Brad M. Potts
Brad M. Potts University of Tasmania
Stephen H. Roxburgh
Stephen H. Roxburgh Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Keryn I. Paul
Keryn I. Paul Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth A. Pinkard

Recently Published Articles