World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Caroline Mohammed

Caroline Mohammed

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 42 3530 3298 244 229 232 5892

Caroline Mohammed publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Caroline Mohammed between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Caroline Mohammed published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2007. 11 of the 263 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2007. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
1985 2025

263 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Caroline Mohammed: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 1
1997 7
1998 5
1999 8
2000 12
2001 9
2002 10
2003 14
2004 9
2005 9
2006 14
2007 16
2008 9
2009 11
2010 3
2011 15
2012 16
2013 6
2014 9
2015 7
2016 6
2017 8
2018 8
2019 8
2020 8
2021 2
2022 5
2023 9
2024 7
2025 4
Total 263
Download as CSV

Caroline Mohammed publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Mohammed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–235 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 232 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53 232
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Caroline Mohammed D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Mohammed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228 42
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Caroline Mohammed is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focus on subfields including Ecology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, and Cell Biology.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics such as:

  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Caroline Mohammed has published research in several frequent venues, including:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Tree Genetics & Genomes
  • Australasian Plant Pathology
  • Preprints.org
  • Forests

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on agricultural systems, data analysis methods, and applications of remote sensing and machine learning. Notable publications include:

  • Improvement of pasture biomass modelling using high-resolution satellite imagery and machine learning (2024, Journal of Environmental Management)
  • Farm diversification strategies, dietary diversity and farm size: Results from a cross-country sample in South and Southeast Asia (2023, Global Food Security)
  • Enabling Regenerative Agriculture Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning (2023, Land)
  • Decomposing crop model uncertainty: A systematic review (2022, Field Crops Research)
  • Implications of data aggregation method on crop model outputs - The case of irrigated potato systems in Tasmania, Australia (2021, European Journal of Agronomy)

Frequent collaborators in Caroline Mohammed's research include:

  • Morag Glen
  • Jonathan J. Ojeda
  • Michael Gbenga Ogungbuyi
  • Andrew M. Fischer
  • Matthew Tom Harrison

Best Publications

  • Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees

    Alieta Eyles;Pierluigi Bonello;Rebecca Ganley;Caroline Mohammed;Caroline Mohammed

  • Puccinia psidii: a threat to the Australian environment and economy a review

    M. Glen;A. C. Alfenas;E. A. V. Zauza;M. J. Wingfield

  • Perception of climate change and its impact by smallholders in pastoral/agropastoral systems of Borana, South Ethiopia

    Nega Debela;Caroline Mohammed;Kerry Bridle;Ross Corkrey

  • Geographical distribution and ecology of the Armillaria species in western Europe.

    J. J. Guillaumin;C. Mohammed;N. Anselmi;R. Courtecuisse

  • Shifts in biomass and resource allocation patterns following defoliation in Eucalyptus globulus growing with varying water and nutrient supplies

    Alieta Eyles;Elizabeth A Pinkard;Caroline Mohammed;Caroline Mohammed;Caroline Mohammed

  • Chlorophyll and nitrogen determination for plantation-grown Eucalyptus nitens and E. globulus using a non-destructive meter

    EA Pinkard;EA Pinkard;VS Patel;VS Patel;CL Mohammed;CL Mohammed

  • Identification of hydrolysable tannins in the reaction zone of Eucalyptus nitens wood by high performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry

    K. M. Barry;N. W. Davies;C. L. Mohammed;C. L. Mohammed

  • Application of Remote Sensing Technologies for Assessing Planted Forests Damaged by Insect Pests and Fungal Pathogens: a Review

    Christine Stone;Caroline Mohammed

  • Comparison of antifungal and antioxidant activities of Acacia mangium and A. auriculiformis heartwood extracts.

    Rie Mihara;Karen M. Barry;Karen M. Barry;Caroline L. Mohammed;Caroline L. Mohammed;Tohru Mitsunaga

  • Genetic variation in Eucalyptus globulus for susceptibility to Mycosphaerella nubilosa and its association with tree growth

    AW Milgate;BM Potts;K Joyce;CL Mohammed

  • Defoliation and nitrogen effects on photosynthesis and growth of Eucalyptus globulus.

    Elizabeth A Pinkard;Michael Battaglia;Caroline L Mohammed

  • Variation in the ITS and IGS regions of ribosomal DNA among the biological species of European Armillaria

    M. Chillali;H. Idder-Ighili;J.J. Guillaumin;C. Mohammed

  • Management of basidiomycete root‐ and stem‐rot diseases in oil palm, rubber and tropical hardwood plantation crops

    C. L. Mohammed;A. Rimbawanto;D. E. Page

  • Ganoderma and Amauroderma species associated with root-rot disease of Acacia mangium plantation trees in Indonesia and Malaysia

    Morag Glen;Neale L. Bougher;Anthony A. Francis;Susan Q. Nigg

  • Foliicolous Mycosphaerella spp. and their anamorphs on Corymbia and Eucalyptus

    PW Crous;BA Summerell;AJ Carnegie;CL Mohammed

  • Photosynthesis of Eucalyptus globulus with Mycosphaerella leaf disease.

    E. A. Pinkard;C. L. Mohammed

  • Anatomical and histochemical defence responses induced in juvenile leaves of Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens by Mycosphaerella infection

    A. H. Smith;A. H. Smith;A. H. Smith;W. M. Gill;E. A. Pinkard;C. L. Mohammed;C. L. Mohammed;C. L. Mohammed

  • Interactive effects of water supply and defoliation on photosynthesis, plant water status and growth of Eucalyptus globulus Labill.

    A. G. Quentin;A. P. O'Grady;A. P. O'Grady;C. L. Beadle;C. L. Beadle;C. Mohammed;C. Mohammed

  • Do artificial and natural defoliation have similar effects on physiology of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. seedlings

    Audrey G. Quentin;Audrey G. Quentin;Elizabeth A. Pinkard;Elizabeth A. Pinkard;Elizabeth A. Pinkard;Christopher L. Beadle;Christopher L. Beadle;Christopher L. Beadle;Timothy J. Wardlaw

  • Delineation of the European Armillaria species based on the sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of ribosomal DNA

    Mohammed Chillali;Daniel Wipf;Jean-Jacques Guillaumin;Caroline Mohammed

  • Crown-scale evaluation of spectral indices for defoliated and discoloured eucalypts

    K. M. Barry;C. Stone;C. L. Mohammed

  • Effects of fertilising with nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and crown condition of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. experiencing insect defoliation

    E.A. Pinkard;E.A. Pinkard;C. Baillie;C. Baillie;V. Patel;V. Patel;C.L. Mohammed;C.L. Mohammed

  • INCIDENCE AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ROOT ROT OF ACACIA MANGIUM IN INDONESIA

    R. S. B. Irianto;K. Barry;N. Hidayati;S. Ito

  • The ecology and diversity of wood-inhabiting macrofungi in a native Eucalyptus obliqua forest of southern Tasmania, Australia

    Genevieve M. Gates;Caroline Mohammed;Tim Wardlaw;David A. Ratkowsky

  • Growth responses of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. to nitrogen application and severity, pattern and frequency of artificial defoliation

    E.A. Pinkard;E.A. Pinkard;C.C. Baillie;C.C. Baillie;V. Patel;V. Patel;S. Paterson;S. Paterson

  • Whole-plant versus leaf-level regulation of photosynthetic responses after partial defoliation in Eucalyptus globulus saplings

    Alieta Eyles;Elizabeth A. Pinkard;Elizabeth A. Pinkard;Elizabeth A. Pinkard;Noel W. Davies;Ross Corkrey

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher L. Beadle
Christopher L. Beadle University of Tasmania
Alieta Eyles
Alieta Eyles University of Tasmania
Tim Wardlaw
Tim Wardlaw Forestry Tasmania
Elizabeth A. Pinkard
Elizabeth A. Pinkard Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Noel W. Davies
Noel W. Davies University of Leicester
Michael Battaglia
Michael Battaglia Agriculture and Food
René E. Vaillancourt
René E. Vaillancourt University of Tasmania
Anthony P. O'Grady
Anthony P. O'Grady Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Brad M. Potts
Brad M. Potts University of Tasmania
Michael J. Wingfield
Michael J. Wingfield University of Pretoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Caroline Mohammed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles