World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
18815
World Ranking
18532
National Ranking
977

Eike Martin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eike Martin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 403 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eike Martin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eike Martin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eike Martin is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine. Their subfields of study include Surgery, Oncology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses a range of medical topics with a particular emphasis on:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

Recent publications by Eike Martin include:

  • Protocol of a randomised controlled phase II clinical trial investigating PREoperative endoscopic injection of BOTulinum toxin into the sphincter of Oddi to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: the PREBOT Pilot trial, 2020, BMJ Open
  • Perioperative corticosteroids for patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery (CORPUS), 2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Protocol of a randomised controlled phase II clinical trial investigating PREoperative endoscopic injection of BOTulinum toxin into the sphincter of Oddi to reduce bile leakage after hepatic resection: the PREBOT-II trial, 2023, BMJ Open

Eike Martin frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors, including:

  • Ulla Klaiber
  • Peter Sauer
  • Markus K. Diener
  • Markus W. Büchler
  • Thilo Hackert

The majority of the scientist's publications appear in the following venues:

  • BMJ Open
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Best Publications

  • Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) regulates sepsis but not the adaptive immune response

    Birgit Liliensiek;Birgit Liliensiek;Markus A. Weigand;Angelika Bierhaus;Werner Nicklas

  • Role of NFkappaB in the mortality of sepsis.

    H Böhrer;F Qiu;T Zimmermann;Y Zhang

  • Randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of acupuncture and a newly designed placebo needle in rotator cuff tendinitis.

    Kleinhenz J;Streitberger K;Windeler J;Güssbacher A

  • Efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy after initially unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective clinical trial.

    Bernd W Böttiger;Christoph Bode;Christoph Bode;Sabine Kern;André Gries

  • Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia.

    Thomas Grau;Rudiger Wolfgang Leipold;Renate Conradi;Eike Martin

  • Assessment of the safety of recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in patients with severe sepsis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study.

    Edward Abraham;Konrad Reinhart;Petr Svoboda;Allan Seibert

  • Astroglial Protein S-100 Is an Early and Sensitive Marker of Hypoxic Brain Damage and Outcome After Cardiac Arrest in Humans

    Bernd W. Böttiger;Stefan Möbes;Rolf Glätzer;Harald Bauer

  • Activation of Blood Coagulation After Cardiac Arrest Is Not Balanced Adequately by Activation of Endogenous Fibrinolysis

    Bernd W. Böttiger;Johann Motsch;Hubert Böhrer;Thomas Böker

  • Sepsis and major abdominal surgery lead to flaking of the endothelial glycocalix.

    Jochen Steppan;Stefan Hofer;Benjamin Funke;Thorsten Brenner

  • Long term outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with physician staffed emergency medical services: the Utstein style applied to a midsized urban/suburban area.

    B W Böttiger;C Grabner;H Bauer;C Bode

  • Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture.

    T. Grau;R. W. Leipold;R. Conradi;E. Martin

  • Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study.

    Thomas Grau;Erika Bartusseck;Renate Conradi;Eike Martin

  • Central sympatholytics prolong survival in experimental sepsis

    Stefan Hofer;Jochen Steppan;Tanja Wagner;Benjamin Funke

  • Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging.

    Thomas Grau;Rüdiger W. Leipold;Johannes Horter;Renate Conradi

  • Developing the skill of endotracheal intubation: implication for emergency medicine.

    M. Bernhard;S. Mohr;M. A. Weigand;E. Martin

  • Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia

    T. Grau;R. W. Leipold;S. Fatehi;E. Martin

  • The lumbar epidural space in pregnancy: visualization by ultrasonography

    T. Grau;R.W. Leipold;J. Horter;R. Conradi

  • Inhaled Nitric Oxide Inhibits Human Platelet Aggregation, P-Selectin Expression, and Fibrinogen Binding In Vitro and In Vivo

    André Gries;Christoph Bode;Karlheinz Peter;Axel Herr

  • Early postoperative delirium after open-heart cardiac surgery is associated with decreased bispectral EEG and increased cortisol and interleukin-6

    Konstanze Plaschke;Philipp Fichtenkamm;Christoph Schramm;Steffen Hauth

  • The acute myotoxic effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine after continuous peripheral nerve blockades

    Wolfgang Zink;Jürgen R E Bohl;Nicola Hacke;Barbara Sinner

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter P. Nawroth
Peter P. Nawroth Heidelberg University
Angelika Bierhaus
Angelika Bierhaus Heidelberg University
Jürgen Weitz
Jürgen Weitz TU Dresden
Markus W. Büchler
Markus W. Büchler Champalimaud Foundation
Christoph Bode
Christoph Bode University of Freiburg
Rainer H. Fink
Rainer H. Fink University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Claudia Spies
Claudia Spies Charité - University Medicine Berlin
David F. Stowe
David F. Stowe Medical College of Wisconsin
Reinhard Ziegler
Reinhard Ziegler Heidelberg University
Johannes Zimmermann
Johannes Zimmermann University of Kassel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, there are several affordable online degree pathways that can help you advance in healthcare. Many students pursue nursing as a first step, and online programs now make it easier and more cost-effective than ever.

For those moving towards advanced practice, you might explore cheap online fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. Likewise, aspiring nurse leaders can benefit from cheapest online msn programs for a Master’s in Nursing, opening up broader career prospects.

If you’re interested in pursuing the highest level of nursing education, check out the cheapest dnp programs online, which prepare nurses for leadership, clinical, and research roles. Meanwhile, registered nurses looking to complete their bachelor’s degree should consider the cheapest rn to bsn online programs available.

These flexible online programs allow you to advance your healthcare career while accommodating your busy schedule and budget—helping you move forward faster in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Eike Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles