What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Wim Crielaard mainly investigates Microbiology, Microbiome, Biofilm, Metagenomics and Saliva.
The concepts of his Microbiology study are interwoven with issues in Ecotype and Virulence.
Wim Crielaard focuses mostly in the field of Microbiome, narrowing it down to topics relating to Antibiotics and, in certain cases, Traditional medicine and Antimicrobial.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Streptococcus mutans, Biotechnology and Corpus albicans.
His studies in Metagenomics integrate themes in fields like Microbial composition, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Oral Microbiome.
His Saliva study incorporates themes from Pyrosequencing, Hypervariable region, Sequence analysis, Phylotype and Dysbiosis.
His most cited work include:
- Defining the healthy "core microbiome" of oral microbial communities (687 citations)
- Pyrosequencing analysis of the Oral Microflora of healthy adults (510 citations)
- Same Exposure but Two Radically Different Responses to Antibiotics: Resilience of the Salivary Microbiome versus Long-Term Microbial Shifts in Feces (207 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Microbiology, Biofilm, Streptococcus mutans, Biochemistry and Microbiome are his primary areas of study.
His Microbiology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Periodontitis, Microcosm and Saliva.
His Saliva research incorporates elements of Gingivitis, Dental plaque and Candida albicans.
His Biofilm research also works with subjects such as
- Antimicrobial and related Streptococcaceae,
- Enterococcus faecalis which intersects with area such as Root canal.
His studies link Antibiotic resistance with Streptococcus mutans.
Wim Crielaard interconnects Antibiotics, Dentistry and Metagenomics in the investigation of issues within Microbiome.
He most often published in these fields:
- Microbiology (47.62%)
- Biofilm (31.43%)
- Streptococcus mutans (19.05%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Biofilm (31.43%)
- Microbiology (47.62%)
- Oral Microbiome (7.14%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Wim Crielaard mostly deals with Biofilm, Microbiology, Oral Microbiome, Periodontitis and Microbiome.
His Biofilm research entails a greater understanding of Bacteria.
He incorporates Microbiology and Streptococcus mitis in his studies.
His Oral Microbiome research incorporates themes from Tongue, Sample and Saliva.
His research integrates issues of Clinical study design, Meta-analysis, Rheumatoid arthritis and Systemic inflammation in his study of Periodontitis.
His study in Microbiome is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Porphyromonas gingivalis, Amplicon sequencing, Dentistry, Root canal and Metagenomics.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy – what we know and what we don’t (159 citations)
- Dental aerosols: microbial composition and spatial distribution. (24 citations)
- Subgingival microbiome of rheumatoid arthritis patients in relation to their disease status and periodontal health. (21 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of investigation include Biofilm, Periodontitis, Microbiology, Antimicrobial and Microcosm.
His research in Biofilm intersects with topics in Chlorhexidine, Enterobacteriaceae, Hydrogen peroxide, TLR4 and Innate immune system.
His Periodontitis research integrates issues from Quorum sensing, Autoinducer, Dental plaque, Bacteria and Rheumatoid arthritis.
The Microbiology study combines topics in areas such as TIRAP, Toll-like receptor, Immune system, IRAK4 and Signal transduction.
His Antimicrobial research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Food science, Citric acid, Traditional medicine and Antibiotics.
His Microcosm study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Niche, Oral Microbiome, 16S ribosomal RNA and Saliva.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
