World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
6580
World Ranking
8051
National Ranking
2881

Douglas R. Schmitt publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas R. Schmitt sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 346 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Douglas R. Schmitt D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas R. Schmitt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas R. Schmitt is a researcher affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their academic work spans Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Engineering, with a particular focus on subfields such as Geophysics, Ocean Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, and Environmental Engineering.

The researcher has contributed extensively to the study of seismic phenomena, rock mechanics, and subsurface processes. Major topics of Schmitt's research include Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Seismic Waves and Analysis, Drilling and Well Engineering, earthquake and tectonic studies, Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis, Rock Mechanics and Modeling, and CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions.

Frequent publication venues for their work include the Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, where they have multiple papers, as well as the Journal of Applied Geophysics and International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. Other venues include Chemical Geology and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Douglas R. Schmitt often collaborates with several researchers, including Wenjing Wang, Rachel E. Abercrombie, Yves Bernabé, Mark J. Dekkers, and Isabelle Manighetti, all of whom have co-authored multiple publications with Schmitt.

The following is a list of recent papers authored or co-authored by Schmitt:

  • A program to forward model the failure pattern around the wellbore in elastic and strength anisotropic rock formations, 2022, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
  • States of In Situ Stress in the Duvernay East Shale Basin and Willesden Green of Alberta, Canada: Variable In Situ Stress States Effect Fault Stability, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Heterogeneity Versus Anisotropy and the State of Stress in Stable Cratons: Observations From a Deep Borehole in Northeastern Alberta, Canada, 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Interaction between CO2-rich acidic water, hydrated Portland cement and sedimentary rocks: Column experiments and reactive transport modeling, 2021, Chemical Geology
  • Ocean resurge-induced impact melt dynamics on the peak-ring of the Chicxulub impact structure, Mexico, 2021, International Journal of Earth Sciences

Best Publications

  • Obliquity-paced Pliocene West Antarctic ice sheet oscillations

    T. Naish;T. Naish;R. Powell;R. Levy;R. Levy;G. Wilson

  • Simulated annealing inversion of multimode Rayleigh wave dispersion curves for geological structure

    K. S. Beaty;D. R. Schmitt;M. Sacchi

  • The formation of peak rings in large impact craters

    Joanna V. Morgan;Sean P.S. Gulick;Timothy Bralower;Elise Chenot

  • Crustal stress determination from boreholes and rock cores: Fundamental principles

    Douglas R. Schmitt;Claire A. Currie;Lei Zhang

  • Poroelastic effects in the determination of the maximum horizontal principal stress in hydraulic fracturing tests—A proposed breakdown equation employing a modified effective stress relation for tensile failure

    D.R. Schmitt;M.D. Zoback

  • First-break timing: Arrival onset times by direct correlation

    Joseph B. Molyneux;Douglas R. Schmitt

  • Repeatability of multimode Rayleigh‐wave dispersion studies

    Kristen S. Beaty;Douglas R. Schmitt

  • Physical properties and seismic imaging of massive sulfides

    Matthew H. Salisbury;Bernd Milkereit;Graham Ascough;Robin Adair

  • Amplitude and AVO responses of a single thin bed

    Yinbin Liu;Douglas R. Schmitt

  • Extreme hydrothermal conditions at an active plate-bounding fault

    Rupert Sutherland;Rupert Sutherland;John Townend;Virginia Toy;Phaedra Upton

  • Seismic attributes for monitoring of a shallow heated heavy oil reservoir; a case study

    Douglas R. Schmitt

  • A revised crustal stress orientation database for Canada

    Karsten Reiter;Oliver Heidbach;Douglas Schmitt;Kristine Haug

  • Diminished pore pressure in low‐porosity crystalline rock under tensional failure: Apparent strengthening by dilatancy

    Douglas R. Schmitt;Mark D. Zoback

  • Drilling-induced core fractures and in situ stress

    Yongyi Li;Douglas R. Schmitt

  • A comparative study of the anisotropic dynamic and static elastic moduli of unconventional reservoir shales: Implication for geomechanical investigations

    Jaime Meléndez-Martínez;Douglas R. Schmitt

  • Infiltration effects in the tensile rupture of thin walled cylinders of glass and granite: Implications for the hydraulic fracturing breakdown equation

    D.R. Schmitt;M.D. Zoback

  • Measurement of total porosity for gas shales by gas injection porosimetry (GIP) method

    Jianmeng Sun;Xu Dong;Xu Dong;Jinjie Wang;Douglas R. Schmitt

  • Compressional-wave velocities in attenuating media: A laboratory physical model study

    Joseph B. Molyneux;Douglas R. Schmitt

  • Intrinsic elasticity of a textured transversely isotropic muscovite aggregate: Comparisons to the seismic anisotropy of schists and shales

    Pavlo Y. Cholach;Pavlo Y. Cholach;Douglas R. Schmitt

  • Static and dynamic pressure sensitivity anisotropy of a calcareous shale

    Oliver N. Ong;Douglas R. Schmitt;Randolph S. Kofman;Kristine Haug

  • Determination of the complete elastic stiffnesses from ultrasonic phase velocity measurements

    Marko Mah;Douglas R. Schmitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernd Milkereit
Bernd Milkereit University of Toronto
Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson Australian National University
Thomas J. Ahrens
Thomas J. Ahrens California Institute of Technology
Martha K. Savage
Martha K. Savage Victoria University of Wellington
Jacek Majorowicz
Jacek Majorowicz University of Alberta
Gail L. Christeson
Gail L. Christeson The University of Texas at Austin
John W. Shervais
John W. Shervais Utah State University
John Townend
John Townend Victoria University of Wellington
Catalina Gebhardt
Catalina Gebhardt Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Ilmo T. Kukkonen
Ilmo T. Kukkonen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences offers a versatile foundation for various interdisciplinary careers. For those interested in leadership and public administration within environmental policy, exploring mpa one year programs can provide an accelerated pathway into management roles in government or nonprofit sectors.

Additionally, an understanding of human behavior and society is crucial for addressing environmental challenges. Pursuing online bachelors degree programs in sociology can complement environmental studies by offering insights into social dynamics and community engagement.

Educators aiming to impact environmental awareness and policy through teaching or leadership can benefit from advanced educational degrees. Many look into online edd no dissertation options for flexibility and focused research without the extended commitment of a traditional dissertation.

Those seeking to transition smoothly in academia or educational leadership might explore eds to edd programs online, which provide a streamlined path from a master's to a doctoral degree, enhancing career opportunities in environmental education and administration.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas R. Schmitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles