World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 68 6695 6071 231 204 265 13394

Marian Chatenet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marian Chatenet between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marian Chatenet published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2013. 25 of the 303 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2013. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 10 publications
2000 2025

303 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marian Chatenet: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 7
2007 15
2008 5
2009 16
2010 19
2011 13
2012 10
2013 20
2014 16
2015 19
2016 15
2017 16
2018 20
2019 9
2020 20
2021 16
2022 16
2023 18
2024 15
2025 10
Total 303
Download as CSV

Marian Chatenet publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marian Chatenet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 265 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979 265
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Marian Chatenet D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marian Chatenet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683 68
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marian Chatenet is affiliated with Université Savoie Mont Blanc in France. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of engineering and energy, with specific emphasis on electrical and electronic engineering as well as renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment. Their scientific work also spans materials chemistry, electrochemistry, and mechanical engineering.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Advanced battery technologies research
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Conducting polymers and applications

Marian Chatenet has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments, 2022, Chemical Society Reviews
  • Durability challenges of anion exchange membrane fuel cells, 2020, Energy & Environmental Science
  • Fe-Ni-based alloys as highly active and low-cost oxygen evolution reaction catalyst in alkaline media, 2024, Nature Materials
  • Recent Advances in the Understanding of Nickel-Based Catalysts for the Oxidation of Hydrogen-Containing Fuels in Alkaline Media, 2020, ACS Catalysis
  • Use of magnetic fields in electrochemistry: A selected review, 2020, Current Opinion in Electrochemistry

Their frequent collaborators include Fabrice Micoud, Antoine Bonnefont, Ricardo Sgarbi, Laëtitia Dubau, and Julia Mainka.

Marian Chatenet has published extensively in several scientific venues. Key publication venues where they have appeared most frequently are:

  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • Electrochimica Acta
  • Journal of Power Sources
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Electrocatalysis

Their body of work reflects a strong focus on electrocatalysts and fuel cell materials, addressing challenges in durability and catalysis mechanisms. The interplay between fundamental scientific understanding and applied energy solutions is evident throughout their research portfolio.

Best Publications

  • Carbon-Supported Manganese Oxide Nanoparticles as Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) in Alkaline Medium: Physical Characterizations and ORR Mechanism

    Ivan Roche;Eric Chaînet;Marian Chatenet;Jiři Vondrák

  • Durability challenges of anion exchange membrane fuel cells

    William E. Mustain;Marian Chatenet;Miles Page;Yu Seung Kim

  • Improved water electrolysis using magnetic heating of FeC–Ni core–shell nanoparticles

    Christiane Niether;Stéphane Faure;Alexis Bordet;Jonathan Deseure

  • Huge Instability of Pt/C Catalysts in Alkaline Medium

    Anicet Zadick;Anicet Zadick;Laetitia Dubau;Laetitia Dubau;Nicolas Sergent;Nicolas Sergent;Grégory Berthomé;Grégory Berthomé

  • A review of PEM fuel cell durability: materials degradation, local heterogeneities of aging and possible mitigation strategies

    Laetitia Dubau;Luis Castanheira;Frédéric Maillard;Marian Chatenet

  • Detection of Pt z + Ions and Pt Nanoparticles Inside the Membrane of a Used PEMFC

    Elodie Guilminot;Audrey Corcella;Frédéric Charlot;Frédéric Maillard

  • Kinetics of sodium borohydride direct oxidation and oxygen reduction in sodium hydroxide electrolyte. Part I. BH4- electro-oxidation on Au and Ag catalysts

    Marian Chatenet;Fabrice Micoud;Ivan Roche;Eric Chaînet

  • Carbon Corrosion in Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: From Model Experiments to Real-Life Operation in Membrane Electrode Assemblies

    Luis Castanheira;Laetitia Dubau;Michel Mermoux;Gregory Berthomé

  • Oxygen reduction on silver catalysts in solutions containing various concentrations of sodium hydroxide – comparison with platinum

    M. Chatenet;L. Genies-Bultel;M. Aurousseau;R. Durand

  • Membrane and Active Layer Degradation upon PEMFC Steady-State Operation I. Platinum Dissolution and Redistribution within the MEA

    Elodie Guilminot;Audrey Corcella;Marian Chatenet;Frédéric Maillard

  • Highly dispersed platinum on carbon aerogels as supported catalysts for PEM fuel cell-electrodes: comparison of two different synthesis paths

    Julien Marie;Sandrine Berthon-Fabry;Patrick Achard;Marian Chatenet

  • Recent Advances in the Understanding of Nickel-Based Catalysts for the Oxidation of Hydrogen-Containing Fuels in Alkaline Media

    Alexandr G. Oshchepkov;Guillaume Braesch;Guillaume Braesch;Antoine Bonnefont;Elena R. Savinova

  • Degradation heterogeneities induced by repetitive start/stop events in proton exchange membrane fuel cell: Inlet vs. outlet and channel vs. land

    Julien Durst;Adrien Lamibrac;Frédéric Charlot;Jérome Dillet

  • Highly active nanostructured palladium-ceria electrocatalysts for the hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline medium

    Hamish A. Miller;Francesco Vizza;Marcello Marelli;Anicet Zadick;Anicet Zadick

  • Further insights into the durability of Pt3Co/C electrocatalysts: Formation of “hollow” Pt nanoparticles induced by the Kirkendall effect

    L. Dubau;J. Durst;F. Maillard;L. Guétaz

  • Use of cellulose-based carbon aerogels as catalyst support for PEM fuel cell electrodes: Electrochemical characterization

    Elodie Guilminot;Florent Fischer;Marian Chatenet;Arnaud Rigacci

  • Steel: The Resurrection of a Forgotten Water-Splitting Catalyst

    Helmut Schäfer;Marian Chatenet

  • Ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) investigation on Pt/C, Rh/C, and Pt-based bi- and tri-metallic electrocatalysts: A DEMS and in situ FTIR study

    Antoine Bach Delpeuch;Antoine Bach Delpeuch;Frédéric Maillard;Frédéric Maillard;Marian Chatenet;Marian Chatenet;Priscillia Soudant;Priscillia Soudant

  • Direct oxidation of sodium borohydride on Pt, Ag and alloyed Pt–Ag electrodes in basic media. Part I: Bulk electrodes

    B. Molina Concha;M. Chatenet

  • Durability of Pt3Co/C nanoparticles in a proton-exchange membrane fuel cell: Direct evidence of bulk Co segregation to the surface

    F. Maillard;L. Dubau;J. Durst;M. Chatenet

Frequent Co-Authors

Laetitia Dubau
Laetitia Dubau Grenoble Alpes University
Frédéric Maillard
Frédéric Maillard Grenoble Alpes University
Edson A. Ticianelli
Edson A. Ticianelli Universidade de São Paulo
Gaël Maranzana
Gaël Maranzana University of Lorraine
Elena R. Savinova
Elena R. Savinova University of Strasbourg
Plamen Atanassov
Plamen Atanassov University of California, Irvine
Alexey Serov
Alexey Serov University of New Mexico
Umit B. Demirci
Umit B. Demirci Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Paul Pirard
Jean-Paul Pirard University of Liège
Olivier Lottin
Olivier Lottin University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry and its practical applications, pursuing a masters in forensic psychology online can be a valuable pathway. This degree blends scientific knowledge with criminal justice, enabling careers in forensic analysis and investigative roles.

Understanding career prospects is essential, especially when considering fields like forensic science. The forensic scientist salary data highlights growth potential and earning opportunities, which can guide decision-making when selecting a specialized degree track.

Cost is a significant factor for many students exploring these advanced study options. Exploring resources about how much does it cost to get a criminal justice degree provides insights on tuition fees and financial planning, helping students budget effectively for their education.

For those just beginning their journey, an accredited online criminal justice associate degree offers a solid foundation. This degree supports entry-level job prospects while allowing for further academic or professional advancement in fields related to chemistry and forensics.

Best Scientists Citing Marian Chatenet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles