World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David W. Eaton

David W. Eaton

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
62
Citations
12117
World Ranking
1711
National Ranking
77

David W. Eaton publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Eaton sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 386 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

David W. Eaton D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Eaton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. Eaton is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Engineering.

The main fields of study include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering

Their work delves into several subfields such as:

  • Geophysics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials

Key research topics covered in their publications are:

  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials

David W. Eaton has contributed frequently to several publication venues. The most common ones include:

  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Scientific Reports
  • Geophysics

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Eaton include:

  • "Developments in understanding seismicity triggered by hydraulic fracturing," 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • "Episodic Lithospheric Deformation in Eastern Tibet Inferred From Seismic Anisotropy," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Large-Scale Fracture Systems Are Permeable Pathways for Fault Activation During Hydraulic Fracturing," 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "InSAR data reveal that the largest hydraulic fracturing-induced earthquake in Canada, to date, is a slow-slip event," 2022, Scientific Reports
  • "Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Geological Susceptibility to Induced Seismicity in the Montney Formation, Canada," 2020, Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent co-authors working with Eaton consist of:

  • Rebecca O. Salvage
  • Jan Dettmer
  • Yuanyuan Ma
  • Chaoyi Wang
  • Nadine Igonin

In addition to scientific articles, Eaton has also contributed to book publications. Notably, they have authored a book published by Cambridge University Press:

  • Environmental Impacts from the Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Reserves, 2022

Best Publications

  • Fault activation by hydraulic fracturing in western Canada.

    Xuewei Bao;David W. Eaton

  • The elusive lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons

    David W. Eaton;Fiona Darbyshire;Rob L. Evans;Herman Grütter

  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Seismicity in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

    Gail M. Atkinson;David W. Eaton;Hadi Ghofrani;Dan Walker

  • Two crustal low-velocity channels beneath SE Tibet revealed by joint inversion of Rayleigh wave dispersion and receiver functions

    Xuewei Bao;Xuewei Bao;Xiaoxiao Sun;Mingjie Xu;David W. Eaton

  • Hydraulic Fracturing-Induced Seismicity

    Ryan Schultz;Robert Skoumal;Michael R. Brudzinski;David Eaton

  • The role of aseismic slip in hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity.

    Thomas S. Eyre;David W. Eaton;Dmitry I. Garagash;Megan Zecevic

  • Hydraulic fracturing volume is associated with induced earthquake productivity in the Duvernay play

    R. Schultz;G. Atkinson;D. W. Eaton;Y. J. Gu

  • A review and appraisal of arrival-time picking methods for downhole microseismic data

    Jubran Akram;David W. Eaton

  • Spatiotemporal variations in the b-value of earthquake magnitude-frequency distributions: Classification and causes

    Z.H. El-Isa;David W. Eaton

  • Developments in understanding seismicity triggered by hydraulic fracturing

    Gail M. Atkinson;David W. Eaton;Nadine Igonin

  • Application of the S transform to prestack noise attenuation filtering

    C. Robert Pinnegar;David W. Eaton

  • Seismic imaging of massive sulfide deposits; Part II, Reflection seismic profiling

    Bernd Milkereit;David Eaton;J. Wu;G. Perron

  • Microseismic Monitoring Developments in Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation

    Mirko van der Baan;David Eaton;Maurice Dusseault

  • Development of 3-D seismic exploration technology for deep nickel-copper deposits—A case history from the Sudbury basin, Canada

    Bernd Milkereit;E. K. Berrer;Alan R. King;Anthony H. Watts

  • How the crust meets the mantle: Lithoprobe perspectives on the Mohorovičić discontinuity and crust–mantle transition

    Frederick A. CookF.A. Cook;Donald J. WhiteD.J. White;Alan G. JonesA.G. Jones;David W.S. EatonD.W.S. Eaton

  • Physical properties and seismic imaging of massive sulfides

    Matthew H. Salisbury;Bernd Milkereit;Graham Ascough;Robin Adair

  • Plateau uplift in western Canada caused by lithospheric delamination along a craton edge

    Xuewei Bao;David W. Eaton;Bernard Guest

  • Velocity-conductivity relationships for mantle mineral assemblages in Archean cratonic lithosphere based on a review of laboratory data and Hashin-Shtrikman extremal bounds

    Alan G. Jones;Rob L. Evans;David W. Eaton

  • Precambrian crustal evolution: seismic constraints from the Canadian Shield

    D.A Thompson;ID Bastow;GR Helffrich;J-M Kendall

  • Discriminating induced seismicity from natural earthquakes using moment tensors and source spectra

    Hongliang Zhang;David W. Eaton;Ge Li;Yajing Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Wu
Patrick Wu University of Hong Kong
Mirko van der Baan
Mirko van der Baan University of Alberta
Alan G. Jones
Alan G. Jones Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies
Gerald M. Ross
Gerald M. Ross Geological Survey of Canada
Ian D. Bastow
Ian D. Bastow Imperial College London
Bernd Milkereit
Bernd Milkereit University of Toronto
Gail M. Atkinson
Gail M. Atkinson University of Western Ontario
J-M Kendall
J-M Kendall University of Oxford
George Helffrich
George Helffrich Tokyo Institute of Technology
James Wookey
James Wookey University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science through online education opens doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students complement their Earth Science knowledge with specialized degrees such as an mfa degree online, which can enhance skills in communication and creativity—valuable assets in environmental advocacy and education roles.

For those interested in management within Earth Science sectors, pursuing online human resource management masters programs can prepare graduates for leadership roles that focus on workforce development and organizational strategy in scientific organizations.

Additionally, the flexibility of Earth Science-related online degrees makes them ideal for various age groups. Research highlights best degrees for older adults, showing that mature learners can successfully engage in new career pathways or lifelong learning through digital platforms.

For those drawn to library and information sciences linked to Earth Science research, an online mlis degree ala accredited provides rigorous training to manage scientific data, archives, and resources efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Eaton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles