World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 71 19926 18686 1790 1713 170 30547

Dawn Waterworth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dawn Waterworth between 1968 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dawn Waterworth published across 59 years, from 1968 to 2026, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2010. 13 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2010. 1968: 2 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 15 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1968 2026

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dawn Waterworth: publications per year, 1968 to 2026
Year Publications
1968 2
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 5
1998 4
1999 3
2000 5
2001 9
2002 2
2003 3
2004 0
2005 3
2006 1
2007 2
2008 12
2009 12
2010 16
2011 11
2012 12
2013 6
2014 3
2015 1
2016 15
2017 5
2018 8
2019 8
2020 4
2021 5
2022 7
2023 5
2024 6
2025 12
2026 1
Total 192
Download as CSV

Dawn Waterworth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dawn Waterworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 170 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155 170
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Dawn Waterworth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dawn Waterworth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226 71
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dawn Waterworth is affiliated with GlaxoSmithKline in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the intersection of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on genetics, surgery, and epidemiology. The scientist's work often addresses topics such as genetic associations and epidemiology, inflammatory bowel disease, microscopic colitis, genomics and rare diseases, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, pancreatic function and diabetes, and IL-33, ST2, and ILC pathways.

Waterworth has contributed to several recent research papers, including:

  • Plasma proteomic associations with genetics and health in the UK Biobank (2023) published in Nature
  • Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization mapping the influence of the plasma proteome on complex diseases (2020) published in Nature Genetics
  • The role of polygenic risk and susceptibility genes in breast cancer over the course of life (2020) published in Nature Communications
  • Inherited myeloproliferative neoplasm risk affects haematopoietic stem cells (2020) published in Nature
  • Genetic regulation of the human plasma proteome in 54,306 UK Biobank participants (2022) published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Waterworth include Heiko Runz, Anders Mälarstig, Julie Hunkapiller, Margaret G. Ehm, and Robert Graham. These collaborations highlight interdisciplinary work within genetics and related biomedical fields.

Waterworth's research has been published repeatedly in a number of academic venues, most notably:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
  • Gastroenterology
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

The scientist's work encompasses multiple subfields, including genetics, surgery, epidemiology, molecular biology, and physiology. This range indicates a broad approach to medical and biological research with an emphasis on complex disease mechanisms and genetic risk factors.

Dawn Waterworth's profile reflects engagement with large cohort studies, proteomics, and disease mapping efforts, contributing to the understanding of genetic influences on health and disease across the lifespan. The combination of publication venues, coauthors, and research topics positions Waterworth within significant multidisciplinary biomedical research networks.

Best Publications

  • Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids

    Tanya M. Teslovich;Kiran Musunuru;Albert V. Smith;Andrew C. Edmondson

  • Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation

    Cristen J. Willer;Elizabeth K. Speliotes;Elizabeth K. Speliotes;Ruth J. F. Loos;Shengxu Li

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure

    Christopher Newton-Cheh;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Toby Johnson;Toby Johnson;Vesela Gateva;Martin D. Tobin

  • Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants.

    Sekar Kathiresan;Benjamin F Voight;Shaun Purcell;Kiran Musunuru

  • Large-scale association analyses identify new loci influencing glycemic traits and provide insight into the underlying biological pathways

    Robert A Scott;Vasiliki Lagou;Ryan P Welch;Eleanor Wheeler

  • Variants in MTNR1B influence fasting glucose levels

    Inga Prokopenko;Claudia Langenberg;Jose C. Florez;Jose C. Florez;Richa Saxena;Richa Saxena

  • The CoLaus study: a population-based study to investigate the epidemiology and genetic determinants of cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome.

    Mathieu Firmann;Vladimir Mayor;Pedro Marques Vidal;Murielle Bochud

  • Genetic Loci Associated With C-Reactive Protein Levels and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

    Paul Elliott;John C. Chambers;Weihua Zhang;Robert Clarke

  • Polycystic ovaries and premature male pattern baldness are associated with one allele of the steroid metabolism gene CYP17

    Adam H. Carey;Dawn Waterworth;Kirty Patel;Davinia White

  • Thirty new loci for age at menarche identified by a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies

    Cathy E. Elks;John R B Perry;Patrick Sulem;Daniel I. Chasman

  • Population-Based Genome-wide Association Studies Reveal Six Loci Influencing Plasma Levels of Liver Enzymes

    Xin Yuan;Dawn Waterworth;John R.B. Perry;Noha Lim

  • Novel Loci for Adiponectin Levels and Their Influence on Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Traits: A Multi-Ethnic Meta-Analysis of 45,891 Individuals

    Z Dastani;Hivert M-F.;Hivert M-F.;N Timpson;Perry Jrb.;Perry Jrb.

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization mapping the influence of the plasma proteome on complex diseases.

    Jie Zheng;Valeriia Haberland;Denis A Baird;Venexia M Walker

  • Genetic variants influencing circulating lipid levels and risk of coronary artery disease.

    Dawn M. Waterworth;Sally L. Ricketts;Kijoung Song;Li Chen

  • Linkage and association of insulin gene VNTR regulatory polymorphism with polycystic ovary syndrome

    Dawn M Waterworth;Simon T Bennett;Neda Gharani;Mark I McCarthy

  • THE GENETIC BASIS OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME

    Stephen Franks;Neda Gharani;Dawn Waterworth;Sari Batty

  • Association of the Steroid Synthesis Gene Cyp11a with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Hyperandrogenism

    Neda Gharani;Dawn M. Waterworth;Sari Batty;Davinia White

  • Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization mapping the influence of the plasma proteome on complex diseases

    Jie Zheng;Valeriia Haberland;Denis Baird;Venexia Walker

  • Erratum: New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (Nature Genetics (2010) 42 (105-116))

    Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Franks
Stephen Franks Imperial College London
Vincent Mooser
Vincent Mooser McGill University Health Centre
J. Brent Richards
J. Brent Richards McGill University
Robert Williamson
Robert Williamson University of Melbourne
Tim Becker
Tim Becker University of Bonn
Markus M. Nöthen
Markus M. Nöthen University Hospital Bonn
Peter Vollenweider
Peter Vollenweider University of Lausanne
Matthew R. Nelson
Matthew R. Nelson GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Toby Johnson
Toby Johnson Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always have to mean attending medical school on campus. Today, there are flexible pathways to pursue healthcare professions online, which can help students save both time and money.

Many learners begin with nursing, thanks to accessible options like the cheapest online nursing programs that cater to budget-conscious students. Registered nurses seeking career advancement may look for programs allowing a seamless transition, such as discovering what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online.

Those already holding a bachelor’s degree and looking to break into specialized or advanced practice roles have further online choices. Non-nurses can pursue advanced degrees through direct entry np programs for non nurses online, which open new career pathways in less time. Nurses seeking the highest level of clinical education and leadership might consider the cheapest dnp online program for a more affordable route to a doctoral degree.

Each of these educational options supports career growth, flexibility, and cost savings, making it easier than ever to join or advance within the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Dawn Waterworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles