World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 64 2337 2231 937 868 190 14009

Amy P. Sullivan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy P. Sullivan between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy P. Sullivan published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2025. 38 of the 244 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2025. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 20 publications
2002 2025

244 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy P. Sullivan: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 12
2007 10
2008 10
2009 8
2010 12
2011 15
2012 5
2013 5
2014 10
2015 13
2016 13
2017 7
2018 18
2019 8
2020 12
2021 11
2022 16
2023 9
2024 18
2025 20
Total 244
Download as CSV

Amy P. Sullivan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy P. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 190 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400 190
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy P. Sullivan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy P. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124 64
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Amy P. Sullivan is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Process Chemistry and Technology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric ozone and climate, air quality and health impacts, fire effects on ecosystems, and air quality monitoring and forecasting.

Among recent publications are:

  • Emissions of Trace Organic Gases From Western U.S. Wildfires Based on WE-CAN Aircraft Measurements, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Aerosol and Cloud Experiments in the Eastern North Atlantic (ACE-ENA), 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Emissions of Reactive Nitrogen From Western U.S. Wildfires During Summer 2018, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Estimating the air quality and health impacts of biomass burning in northern South America using a chemical transport model, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Molecular Characterization of Water-Soluble Brown Carbon Chromophores in Beijing, China, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Amy P. Sullivan frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Jeffrey L. Collett (23 co-publications)
  • Emily V. Fischer (19 co-publications)
  • I. B. Pollack (13 co-publications)
  • Lu Hu (10 co-publications)
  • Wade Permar (9 co-publications)

The majority of their publications appear in the following venues:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (14 publications)
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (8 publications)
  • Environmental Science & Technology (5 publications)
  • Atmosphere (4 publications)
  • Atmospheric Environment (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the anthropogenic-influenced southeastern United States

    Rodney J. Weber;Amy P. Sullivan;Amy P. Sullivan;Richard E. Peltier;Armistead Russell

  • Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles

    D. M. Murphy;D. J. Cziczo;K. D. Froyd;P. K. Hudson

  • Emissions of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the laboratory

    Gavin R. McMeeking;Gavin R. McMeeking;Sonia M. Kreidenweis;Stephen Baker;Christian M. Carrico

  • Levoglucosan stability in biomass burning particles exposed to hydroxyl radicals

    Christopher J. Hennigan;Amy P. Sullivan;Jeffrey L. Collett;Allen L. Robinson

  • Refinements to the particle-into-liquid sampler (PILS) for ground and airborne measurements of water soluble aerosol composition

    Douglas A. Orsini;Yilin Ma;Amy Sullivan;Berko Sierau

  • Variability in nocturnal nitrogen oxide processing and its role in regional air quality.

    S. S. Brown;T. B. Ryerson;A. G. Wollny;C. A. Brock

  • A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles

    C. J. Hennigan;J. Izumi;A. P. Sullivan;R. J. Weber

  • A review of the anthropogenic influence on biogenic secondary organic aerosol

    C.R. Hoyle;C.R. Hoyle;M. Boy;N.M. Donahue;J.L. Fry

  • Chemical and physical transformations of organic aerosol from the photo-oxidation of open biomass burning emissions in an environmental chamber

    C. J. Hennigan;M. A. Miracolo;G. J. Engelhart;A. A. May

  • Sources of Bacteria in Outdoor Air across Cities in the Midwestern United States

    Robert M. Bowers;Amy P. Sullivan;Elizabeth K. Costello;Jeff L. Collett

  • Fine particle pH and the partitioning of nitric acid during winter in the northeastern United States

    Hongyu Guo;Amy P. Sullivan;Pedro Campuzano-Jost;Pedro Campuzano-Jost;Jason C. Schroder;Jason C. Schroder

  • A method for on‐line measurement of water‐soluble organic carbon in ambient aerosol particles: Results from an urban site

    A. P. Sullivan;R. J. Weber;A. L. Clements;J. R. Turner

  • A method for smoke marker measurements and its potential application for determining the contribution of biomass burning from wildfires and prescribed fires to ambient PM2.5 organic carbon

    A. P. Sullivan;A. S. Holden;L. A. Patterson;G. R. McMeeking

  • Source apportionment of fine organic aerosol in Mexico City during the MILAGRO experiment 2006

    E. A. Stone;D. C. Snyder;R. J. Sheesley;A. P. Sullivan

  • Chemical characteristics and light-absorbing property of water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing : Biomass burning contributions

    Caiqing Yan;Mei Zheng;Amy P. Sullivan;Carme Bosch

  • Measurements of reactive trace gases and variable O3 formation rates in some South Carolina biomass burning plumes

    S. K. Akagi;Robert J. Yokelson;I. R. Burling;S. Meinardi

  • Important fossil source contribution to brown carbon in Beijing during winter.

    Caiqing Yan;Mei Zheng;Carme Bosch;August Andersson

  • Chemical feedbacks weaken the wintertime response of particulate sulfate and nitrate to emissions reductions over the eastern United States

    Viral Shah;Lyatt Jaeglé;Joel A. Thornton;Felipe D. Lopez-Hilfiker

  • Airborne measurements of carbonaceous aerosol soluble in water over northeastern United States: Method development and an investigation into water-soluble organic carbon sources

    A. P. Sullivan;Richard E. Peltier;C. A. Brock;J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw

  • Chemical Smoke Marker Emissions During Flaming and Smoldering Phases of Laboratory Open Burning of Wildland Fuels

    Taehyoung Lee;Amy P. Sullivan;Laura Mack;Jose L. Jimenez

  • Sources of particulate matter in the northeastern United States in summer: 1. Direct emissions and secondary formation of organic matter in urban plumes

    J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;C. A. Brock;E. L. Atlas;T. S. Bates

  • Measurements of reactive trace gases and variable O3 formation rates in some South Carolina biomass burning plumes [Discussions]

    S. K. Akagi;R. J. Yokelson;I. R. Burling;S. Meinardi

Frequent Co-Authors

Rodney J. Weber
Rodney J. Weber Georgia Institute of Technology
Jeffrey L. Collett
Jeffrey L. Collett Colorado State University
Sonia M. Kreidenweis
Sonia M. Kreidenweis Colorado State University
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Joel A. Thornton
Joel A. Thornton University of Washington
Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Bret A. Schichtel
Bret A. Schichtel National Park Service
Gavin R. McMeeking
Gavin R. McMeeking Colorado State University
John S. Holloway
John S. Holloway National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Steven S. Brown
Steven S. Brown National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring advanced online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals seek online doctoral programs without dissertation to fast-track their education while balancing other commitments. These programs focus more on applied research and project work, making them accessible for working students.

Educators and administrators may find value in online eds to edd bridge program options, which provide a seamless transition from a master's to a doctoral degree. This pathway often enhances leadership skills essential for environmental policy or academic roles.

For those interested in the social impact dimension of environmental fields, fully funded dsw programs offer an affordable route to specialized social work practice and research. Integrating social work with environmental issues can lead to roles in community advocacy and sustainable development.

Finally, exploring a budget friendly online general studies degree may appeal to those seeking flexibility in course selection while maintaining affordability. This broad approach can complement environmental science knowledge with interdisciplinary skills crucial for emerging green industries.

Best Scientists Citing Amy P. Sullivan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles