World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 45 4686 2114 350 9152

David Pressman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Pressman between 1950 and 1982, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Pressman published across 33 years, from 1950 to 1982, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1973. 5 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 1982. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 1973. 1950: 6 publications 1951: 3 publications 1952: 2 publications 1953: 7 publications 1954: 3 publications 1955: 3 publications 1956: 2 publications 1957: 9 publications 1958: 8 publications 1959: 8 publications 1960: 7 publications 1961: 15 publications 1962: 17 publications 1963: 12 publications 1964: 10 publications 1965: 13 publications 1966: 8 publications 1967: 16 publications 1968: 17 publications 1969: 16 publications 1970: 11 publications 1971: 17 publications 1972: 16 publications 1973: 20 publications 1974: 12 publications 1975: 14 publications 1976: 17 publications 1977: 16 publications 1978: 11 publications 1979: 9 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication
1950 1982

335 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Pressman: publications per year, 1950 to 1982
Year Publications
1950 6
1951 3
1952 2
1953 7
1954 3
1955 3
1956 2
1957 9
1958 8
1959 8
1960 7
1961 15
1962 17
1963 12
1964 10
1965 13
1966 8
1967 16
1968 17
1969 16
1970 11
1971 17
1972 16
1973 20
1974 12
1975 14
1976 17
1977 16
1978 11
1979 9
1980 5
1981 4
1982 1
Total 335
Download as CSV

David Pressman publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Pressman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 342–351 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 350 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96 350
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

David Pressman D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Pressman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157 45
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David Pressman was affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily focused on fields related to engineering and earth and planetary sciences, with significant work across several subfields.

The main subfields in which they conducted research included computational mechanics, earth-surface processes, mechanical engineering, atmospheric science, and applied mathematics. Their work addressed a range of scientific topics such as aquatic and environmental studies, material science and thermodynamics, earth systems and cosmic evolution, computational fluid dynamics and aerodynamics, gas dynamics and kinetic theory, and fluid dynamics and turbulent flows.

Pressman's publication record features contributions to journals including Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya and Russian Meteorology and Hydrology. Their recent papers include:

  • APPROXIMATION OF EQUATIONS FOR A MODEL OF THE CLOUD ATMOSPHERE, 2021, Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya
  • Approximation of Equations for a Model of the Cloud Atmosphere, 2021, Russian Meteorology and Hydrology

The researcher did not have frequent co-authors documented in the available data. Their publications appeared mainly in the following venues:

  • Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya
  • Russian Meteorology and Hydrology

Throughout their career, their investigations contributed to a better understanding of complex phenomena in atmospheric and fluid dynamics, computational mechanics, and environmental studies. The blend of applied mathematics and engineering principles is evident in the modeling approaches used in their scientific outputs.

Best Publications

  • Heterogeneity and average combining constants of antibodies from individual rabbits.

    Alfred Nisonoff;David Pressman

  • Immunological dissection of human Ia molecules.

    R Tosi;N Tanigaki;D Centis;G B Ferrara

  • Production of Free Light Chains of Immunoglobulin by a Hematopoietic Cell Line Derived from a Patient with Multiple Myeloma.

    Unknown

  • The Serological Properties of Simple Substances. VII. A Quantitative Theory of the Inhibition by Haptens of the Precipitation of Heterogeneous Antisera with Antigens, and Comparison with Experimental Results for Polyhaptenic Simple Substances and for Azoproteins

    Linus Pauling;David Pressman;Allan L. Grossberg

  • The in vivo localization of anti-Wagner-osteogenic-sarcoma antibodies

    Unknown

  • The effects of complete modification of amino groups on the antibody activity of antihapten antibodies. Reversible inactivation with maleic anhydride

    Murray H. Freedman;Allan L. Grossberg;David. Pressman

  • Localization in vivo of radio-iodinated anti-rat-fibrin antibodies and radio-iodinated rat fibrinogen in the Murphy rat lymphosarcoma and in other transplantable rat tumors.

    Day Ed;Planinsek Ja;Pressman D

  • THE PRESENCE OF THE RAGWEED-BINDING ANTIBODIES IN THE BETA-2A, BETA-2M, AND GAMMA GLOBULINS OF THE SENSITIVE INDIVIDUALS.

    Yasuo Yagi;Patricia Maier;David Pressman;Carl E. Arbesman

  • Immunoglobulin Production in Human Leukemia Cell Lines

    Nobuyuki Tanigaki;Yasuo Yagi;George E. Moore;David Pressman

  • Modification of arginine in the active sites of antibodies.

    Allan L. Grossberg;David. Pressman

  • THE NATURE OF THE FORCES BETWEEN ANTIGEN AND ANTIBODY AND OF THE PRECIPITATION REACTION

    Linus Pauling;Dan H. Campbell;David Pressman

  • Nature of the Combining Site of Antibody against a Hapten Bearing a Positive Charge1

    Allan L. Grossberg;David Pressman

  • Effect of iodination on the active site of several antihapten antibodies.

    Allan L. Grossberg;Gerald Radzimski;David Pressman

  • Immunoelectrophoretic identification of guinea pig anti-insulin antibodies.

    Yasuo Yagi;Patricia Maier;David Pressman

  • MULTIPLICITY OF ANTIBODY PROTEINS IN RABBIT ANTI-P-AZOBENZENEARSONATE SERA.

    Kauro Onoue;Yasuo Yagi;David Pressman

  • Immunoglobulin Production in Synchronized Cultures of Human Hematopoietic Cell Lines: I. Variation of cellular immunoglobulin level with the generation cycle

    M. Takahashi;Y. Yagi;G. E. Moore;D. Pressman

  • The development and use of radiolabeled antitumor antibodies.

    David Pressman

  • Characterization of soluble substances in plasma carrying HL-A alloantigenic activity and HL-A common antigenic activity.

    Y Miyakawa;N Tanigaki;V P Kreiter;G E Moore

  • Two different anti-insulin antibodies in guinea pig antisera.

    Yasuo Yagi;Patricia Maier;David Pressman

  • Immunoglobulin M Antibodies with Ten Combining Sites

    Unknown

  • Analytical pathology. II. Histopathologic demonstration of glomerular-localizing antibodies in experimental glomerulonephritis.

    Robert C. Mellors;Javier Arias-Stella;Malcolm Siegel;David Pressman

  • The Effect of Iodination on Antibody Activity

    Alonza Johnson;Eugene D. Day;David Pressman

  • Multiplicity of Insulin Binding Antibodies in Human Sera Presence of Antibody Activity in γ-, β2A-, and β2M-Globulins

    Yasuo Yagi;Patricia Maier;David Pressman;Carl E. Arbesman

Frequent Co-Authors

Linus Pauling
Linus Pauling Oregon State University
Alfred Nisonoff
Alfred Nisonoff Brandeis University
Richard B. Bankert
Richard B. Bankert University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Kazuyuki Yoshizaki
Kazuyuki Yoshizaki Osaka University
George Klein
George Klein Karolinska Institute
Arthur B. Pardee
Arthur B. Pardee Harvard University
Leonard A. Herzenberg
Leonard A. Herzenberg Stanford University
Igal Gery
Igal Gery National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Immunology in the USA opens doors to various allied healthcare careers, many of which can be pursued through specialized online programs. For those interested in advancing clinical expertise, an accelerated nurse practitioner program offers a fast-track route to becoming a licensed practitioner with expanded responsibilities.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds can also transition into the nursing field efficiently. For example, some online RN programs for non nurses in Florida provide flexible study options and essential credentials needed to enter clinical practice.

For students seeking a quicker entry into nursing, identifying accelerated nursing programs near me can be crucial. These programs focus on intensive coursework and clinical experiences to shorten the timeline toward becoming a registered nurse.

Meanwhile, starting with foundational certifications like becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) can also be beneficial. Many candidates look for LPN programs with easiest admission requirements to streamline their entry into the nursing workforce while gaining valuable hands-on experience.

Choosing the right educational path depends on your current background, career goals, and how quickly you want to enter the healthcare field. Online degree programs offer flexibility, making it easier to balance study with personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing David Pressman

Recently Published Articles