World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David L. Baillie

David L. Baillie

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 68 2444 2321 82 79 181 14404

David L. Baillie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David L. Baillie between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David L. Baillie published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2007. 1 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2007. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 3 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1966 2025

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David L. Baillie: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 3
1968 1
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 2
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 3
1980 2
1981 2
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 4
1986 0
1987 0
1988 7
1989 3
1990 7
1991 3
1992 1
1993 5
1994 4
1995 3
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 6
2000 4
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 10
2005 13
2006 8
2007 15
2008 4
2009 8
2010 12
2011 3
2012 9
2013 3
2014 2
2015 3
2016 1
2017 1
2018 3
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 189
Download as CSV

David L. Baillie publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Baillie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 175–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 181 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178 181
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

David L. Baillie D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Baillie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164 68
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David L. Baillie is a researcher affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada. Their work spans multiple fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. They have contributed to studies within subfields such as Aging, Molecular Biology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research topics cover a range of areas focused on genetics and molecular mechanisms, particularly in the context of model organisms. Major themes in their work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, and Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies.

Baillie's recent scholarly output includes the paper titled The α-arrestin SUP-13/ARRD-15 promotes isoform turnover of actin-interacting protein 1 in Caenorhabditis elegans striated muscle, published in 2023 in PNAS Nexus.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Mario Lewis
  • Kanako Ono
  • Zhaozhao Qin
  • Robert Johnsen
  • Shoichiro Ono

Their work often appears in the journal PNAS Nexus, where they have at least one recorded publication.

Best Publications

  • Genes and mechanisms related to RNA interference regulate expression of the small temporal RNAs that control C. elegans developmental timing

    Alla Grishok;Amy E. Pasquinelli;Darryl Conte Jr.;Na Li

  • High-Throughput In Vivo Analysis of Gene Expression in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Rebecca Hunt-Newbury;Ryan Viveiros;Robert Johnsen;Allan Mah

  • Loss of C. elegans BBS-7 and BBS-8 protein function results in cilia defects and compromised intraflagellar transport

    Oliver E. Blacque;Michael J. Reardon;Chunmei Li;Jonathan McCarthy

  • Mutations in a member of the Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins causes Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

    Yanli Fan;Muneer A Esmail;Stephen J Ansley;Oliver E Blacque

  • Gene expression profiling of cells, tissues, and developmental stages of the nematode C. elegans.

    S.J. Mckay;R. Johnsen;J. Khattra;J. Asano

  • Genome-scale analysis of in vivo spatiotemporal promoter activity in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Denis Dupuy;Nicolas Bertin;Nicolas Bertin;Kavitha Venkatesan;Domena Tu

  • Molecular and functional characterization of a family of rat brain T-type calcium channels.

    John E. McRory;Celia M. Santi;Kevin S.C. Hamming;Janette Mezeyova

  • Functional Genomics of the Cilium, a Sensory Organelle

    Oliver E. Blacque;Elliot A. Perens;Keith A. Boroevich;Peter N. Inglis

  • Changes in Gene Expression Associated with Developmental Arrest and Longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Steven J.M. Jones;Donald L. Riddle;Anatoli T. Pouzyrev;Victor E. Velculescu

  • A Formin Homology protein and a profilin are required for cytokinesis and Arp2/3-independent assembly of cortical microfilaments in C. elegans.

    Aaron F. Severson;David L. Baillie;Bruce Bowerman

  • The ABC transporter gene family of Caenorhabditis elegans has implications for the evolutionary dynamics of multidrug resistance in eukaryotes

    Jonathan A Sheps;Steven G Ralph;Steven G Ralph;Zhongying Zhao;David L. Baillie

  • LET-413 is a basolateral protein required for the assembly of adherens junctions in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Renaud Legouis;Anne Gansmuller;Satis Sookhareea;Julia M. Bosher

  • The ELT-2 GATA-factor and the global regulation of transcription in the C. elegans intestine.

    James D. McGhee;Monica C. Sleumer;Mikhail Bilenky;Kim Wong

  • A photocontrolled molecular switch regulates paralysis in a living organism.

    Usama Al-Atar;Rylan Fernandes;Bob Johnsen;David Baillie

  • Genetic Organization in CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS: Fine-Structure Analysis of the unc-22 Gene.

    D. G. Moerman;D. L. Baillie

  • The Caenorhabditis elegans hsp70 gene family: a molecular genetic characterization.

    Terry P. Snutch;Mark F.P. Heschl;David L. Baillie

  • Use of genomic DNA restriction fragment length differences to identify nematode species

    J. Curran;D. L. Baillie;J. M. Webster

  • UNC-60B, an ADF/cofilin family protein, is required for proper assembly of actin into myofibrils in Caenorhabditis elegans body wall muscle.

    Shoichiro Ono;David L. Baillie;Guy M. Benian

  • The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-60 gene encodes proteins homologous to a family of actin-binding proteins

    Kim S. McKim;Camela Matheson;Marco A. Marra;Marcia F. Wakarchuk

  • The Effect of Temperature and Parental Age on Recombination and Nondisjunction in CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS.

    A. M. Rose;D. L. Baillie

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco A. Marra
Marco A. Marra University of British Columbia
Steven J.M. Jones
Steven J.M. Jones University of British Columbia
Donald G. Moerman
Donald G. Moerman University of British Columbia
Donald L Riddle
Donald L Riddle University of Missouri
Terrance P. Snutch
Terrance P. Snutch University of British Columbia
Michel R. Leroux
Michel R. Leroux Simon Fraser University
Oliver E. Blacque
Oliver E. Blacque University College Dublin
Robert A. Holt
Robert A. Holt BC Cancer Research Institute
Marc Vidal
Marc Vidal Harvard University
Nicholas Katsanis
Nicholas Katsanis Galatea Bio Inc

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying genetics opens the door to a wide variety of educational and professional opportunities in the health and science sectors. If you are considering alternative study routes or related fields, there are many flexible online degree options to support your career goals.

For those drawn to nursing, some nursing schools without entrance exam requirements make it easier to start a healthcare career without standardized testing barriers. If you’re interested in leadership, a master of healthcare administration can pave the way for management roles in hospitals and medical organizations.

Those wanting to join the workforce quickly may appreciate fast-track LPN programs online, which condense coursework to qualify for practical nursing positions sooner. Advanced students looking to teach or take on higher-level roles can also consider doctorate in nursing education online programs.

No matter your path, these online programs offer convenience, affordability, and broad opportunities in health sciences and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Baillie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles